Lopez v. National Credit Reporting ,Inc

Filing 42

ORDER denying 41 defendant's request for third continuance of show cause hearing re settlement. Counsel of record shall appear in person for the 4/8/2014 show cause hearing. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 4/4/2014. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/4/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN JOSE DIVISION United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 SUSANA LOPEZ, Case No. 5:12-cv-05166 HRL Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 15 NATIONAL CREDIT REPORTING, INC., ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S REQUEST FOR A THIRD CONTINUANCE OF THE SHOW CAUSE HEARING RE SETTLEMENT Defendant. 16 17 On March 5, 2014, this court granted the parties’ second request to continue the show 18 cause hearing re settlement and directed them to file a dismissal by March 25, 2014. If no 19 dismissal was filed by that date, then the parties were ordered to file a joint status report by April 20 1, 2014, and a show cause hearing was set for April 8, 2014, 10:00 a.m. 21 No dismissal has been filed. And, having received defendant’s April 2 status report, the 22 court is disinclined to continue the show cause hearing for a third time. The parties’ counsel of 23 record shall appear in person before this court for the April 8 hearing. 24 25 26 27 28 SO ORDERED. Dated: April 4, 2014 ______________________________________ HOWARD R. LLOYD UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 1 2 5:12-cv-05166-HRL Notice has been electronically mailed to: Elias Ethan Salameh esalameh@fentonkeller.com 3 4 Erin Amanda Novak enovak@consumerlawfirm.com, croth@consumerlawfirm.com, mmailman@consumerlawfirm.com 5 Mark Figueiredo 6 William John Wall mrf@structurelaw.com, JFord@structurelaw.com, mhoang@structurelaw.com wwall@wall-law.com, goceguera@wall-law.com 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?