Lofstrom et al v. Miasole

Filing 20

Order by Hon. Lucy H. Koh granting in part and denying in part 18 Stipulation selecting Private ADR.(lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/28/2012)

Download PDF
Case5:12-cv-05184-LHK Document18 Filed12/26/12 Page1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTFIERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Michael Lofstrom, Chris Barber, Edward J. Mclnerney, and Erica Siu, individually and behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintif(s), v CASE NO. C12-5184 LHK STIPULATTON AND IPROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS MiaSole, A California corporation, Defendant(s) Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L,R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5: The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: Court Processes: n Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4) Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) (Note; Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other þrm of ADR must participate in an ADR phone conference qnd may not file this þrm. They must insteadfile a Notice of Needfor ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5) Private Process: Private ADR (please identify process and provider) The mediator has not X been determined, but the parties are in the process of selecting one. The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: the presumptive deadline Qhe deadline is 90 days from the date of the order n referuing the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. ) X other requested deadline The parties will attempt to complete the ADR process by the presumptive deadline, but request that the Court delay setting a deadline until the parties agree upon a mediator and determine a mediation date that is workable for the parties and the mediator. ( Am€ric¡n LegnlNet' Inc. 704546944 M. FornìsWorkFlow.com Case5:12-cv-05184-LHK Document18 Filed12/26/12 Page2 of 3 Dated: 12126112 lsl Chad Saunders Attorney for Plaintiff Michael Lofstrom, et al Dated: 12126112 /s/ Ruth Attorney for Defendant MiaSole Pursuant to General Order No. 45, I Ruth Zadikany, attest that I obtained concuffence in the filing of this document from the signatories. CONTINUE TO FOLLOWING PAGE Amer¡can Leg¡lNet' Inc, 704546944 w.FormsworkFlow.com ( Case5:12-cv-05184-LHK Document18 Filed12/26/12 Page3 of 3 IPROPOSEDI ORDER n n The parties' stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED. The parties' stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED The parties' stipulation is adopted except to the extent that the parties request that the Court decline to set a deadline to complete the ADR process. The parties' deadline to complete the ADR process is Monday, April 1, 2013. Dated: December 28, 2012 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE The Honorable Lucy H. Koh When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate Docket Mediation." Order on and Even e "Sti Rev. l2lll Page 2 of 2 704546944 Ame¡icsn LegalNet' lnc. w.l.ormsworkFlow.com @

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?