Martinez v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 12

ORDER APPOINTING PRO BONO COUNSEL. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on August 13, 2013. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/13/2013)

Download PDF
*E-FILED: August 13, 2013* 1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 MONICA MARTINEZ, 7 Plaintiff, 8 9 10 vs. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ) ) ) Case Number: 12-CV-05355 HRL ) ) ) ORDER APPOINTING PRO BONO ) COUNSEL ) ) 11 12 13 Because the Plaintiff has requested and is in need of counsel to assist her in this matter, and volunteer attorneys are willing to be appointed to undertake this representation at the request 14 of the Federal Legal Assistance Self Help program (“FLASH”), Christopher Kao and Lauren 15 Cohen, of law firm Perkins, Coie, are hereby appointed as counsel for Plaintiff in this matter, 16 pursuant to the Guidelines of the Federal Pro Bono Project. 17 18 Counsel is appointed for the limited scope of briefing Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. 19 20 All proceedings in this action are hereby stayed until four weeks from the date of this Order. 21 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 24 25 26 27 Dated: ____8/13/13___________ The Honorable Howard Lloyd, United States Magistrate Judge 1 C 12-05355 HRL Order will be electronically mailed to: 2 Alex Gene Tse alex.tse@usdoj.gov, USACAN.SSA@usdoj.gov, yvette.baird@usdoj.gov 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 C 12-05355 HRL Order will be mailed to: Armand D. Roth Social Security Administration 160 Spear Street, Suite 800 San Francisco, CA 94105-1545 Monica S Martinez 732 Banff Street San Jose, CA 95116 Christopher Kao Lauren Cohen Perkins, Coie LLP 3150 Porter Drive Palo Alto CA 94303 Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel who have not registered for e-filing under the court’s CM/ECF program.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?