Jimenez et al v. Custom Spray Systems, Inc.

Filing 17

ORDER directing parties to select a method of ADR forthwith. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on July 2, 2013. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/2/2013)

1
*E-FILED: July 2, 2013*

2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

For the Northern District of California

NOT FOR CITATION

8

United States District Court

7

SAN JOSE DIVISION

11

HENRY JIMENEZ ET AL.,

No. C12-05469 HRL

Plaintiffs,

12

ORDER

v.
13
CUSTOM SPRAY SYSTEMS, INC.,
14
15

Defendant.
____________________________________/

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

At the Case Management Conference held on January 15, 2013, the parties in this case
reported that settlement discussions were underway and that they expected to settle the case within
60 days. For that reason, the parties did not select a method of ADR. In the Case Management
Order dated January 16, 2013 (Dkt. 16), the Court directed the parties to select a method of ADR no
later than March 15, 2013, if the case had not settled by that date. As the parties have not yet
submitted a stipulation selecting an ADR process or a stipulation for dismissal, the parties are
directed to file either forthwith.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: July 2, 2013

26
27
28

HOWARD R. LLOYD
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

1

C 12-05469 Order will be electronically mailed to:

2

Dennis B. Cook [e-mail], [e-mail], [e-mail]

3

Sue Campbell [e-mail], [e-mail], [e-mail]

4

Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel who have not
registered for e-filing under the court’s CM/ECF program.

5
6
7
8
9

For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2