Pasquale v. I.C. System, Inc

Filing 18

STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING THE ENE EVALUATION DEADLINE TO MARCH 15, 2013. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on January 28, 2013. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/28/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 *E-FILED: January 28, 2013* Sean P. Flynn (SBN 220184) sflynn@foleymansfield.com FOLEY & MANSFIELD, PLLP 300 South Grand Avenue, Suite 2800 Los Angeles, CA 90071 Telephone: (213) 283-2100 Facsimile: (213) 283-2101 Attorneys for I.C. SYSTEM, INC. 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SAN JOSE DIVISION 10 11 EUGENE PASQUALE, an individual, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 Case No: 12-cv-05539 HRL STIPULATION TO CONTINUE THE EARLY NEUTRAL EVALUATION DEADLINE vs. I.C. SYSTEM, INC., a Minnesota corporation, 15 Defendant. 16 17 \\\ 18 \\\ 19 \\\ 20 \\\ 21 \\\ 22 \\\ 23 \\\ 24 \\\ 25 \\\ 26 \\\ 27 \\\ 28 \\\ Stipulation to Continue the Early Neutral Evaluation Deadline 1 WHEREFORE, on November 13, 2012, the Court set a 90-day deadline for completion of the 2 Early Neutral Evaluation, or February 11, 2013. After discussions amongst the Parties Counsel, due to 3 the difficulty for a representative of I.C. System, Inc. to appear prior to February 11, 2013, the Parties 4 have agreed to stipulate to the Early Neutral Evaluation completion date being continued until March 15, 5 2013. 6 7 IT IS SO STIPULATED. FOLEY & MANSFIELD, PLLP Dated: January 25, 2013 8 By: 9 10 11 LAW OFFICES OF TODD M. FRIEDMAN, APC Dated: January 25, 2013 12 By: /s/Todd M. Friedman Todd M. Friedman, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiff EUGENE PASQUALE 13 14 15 /s/ Sean P. Flynn Sean P. Flynn, Esq. Attorneys for Defendant I.C. System, Inc. Pursuant to stipulation, it is so ordered. 16 Date: January 28, 2013 17 18 _________________________________ HOWARD R. LLOYD UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Stipulation to Continue the Early Neutral Evaluation Deadline

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?