Softvault Systems, Inc. v. Novell, Inc.

Filing 41

Order by Hon. Lucy H. Koh granting 40 Stipulation to Modify Schedule.(lhklc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/29/2013)

Download PDF
Case5:12-cv-05541-LHK Document40 Filed05/29/13 Page1 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 Karen I, Boyd (SBN 189808) boyd@turnerboyd.com Zhuanjia Gu (SBN 244863) gu@turnerboyd.com TURNER BOYD LLP 2570 W. El Camino Real, Suite 380 Mountain View, California 94040 Telephone: (650) 521-5930 Facsimile: (650) 521-5931 Attorneys for Defendant Novell, Inc. 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SAN JOSE DIVISION 10 SOFTVAULT SYSTEMS, INC., Civil Case No. 5:12-cv-05541-LHK 11 Plaintiff, STIPULATED MOTION TO MODIFY SCHEDULE, PROPOSED ORDER, AND DECLARATION OF COUNSEL 12 vs. 13 NOVELL, INC., 14 Defendant. 15 STIPULATED MOTION 16 17 18 19 20 On February 4, 2013, the Court entered its “Minute Order and Case Management Order” (“Scheduling Order,” ECF No. 23) in the above-captioned action (“Action”) and in two companion actions: SoftVault Systems, Inc. v. Research in Motion, Case No. 12-CV-5544 LHK (“RIM Action”) and SoftVault Systems, Inc. v. International Business Machines Corporation, Case No. 12-CV-5546 LHK (“IBM Action”). The RIM Action has since settled and been dismissed. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 On March 22, 2013, the Court entered a “Modified Scheduling Order” (“Scheduling Order,” ECF No. 32) in the above-captioned action (“Action”). In the last month, Defendant Novell, Inc. (“Novell”) retained the above-named counsel and the parties agreed to participate in mediation on Wednesday, June 5, 2013. In light of Novell’s new counsel and the upcoming mediation, the parties stipulate to the below request that the Court continue certain deadlines imposed by the Scheduling Order. Specifically, Novell and Plaintiff SoftVault Systems, Inc. (“SoftVault”) move the Court to modify the Scheduling Order as set forth in the following table: STIPULATED MOTION TO MODIFY SCHEDULE 1 CASE NO. 5:12-CV-05541-LHK Case5:12-cv-05541-LHK Document40 Filed05/29/13 Page2 of 5 1 2 Event Modified Scheduling Order Proposed Schedule Last day to amend pleadings May 30, 2013 No change Invalidity contentions and accompanying document production (Patent L.R. 3-3, 3-4) May 30, 2013 June 21, 2013 Exchange of proposed terms for construction (Patent L.R. 4-1) June 6, 2013 July 1, 2013 Exchange of preliminary claim constructions and extrinsic evidence (Patent L.R. 4-2) June 20, 2013 July 8, 2013 Joint claim construction and prehearing statement (Patent L.R. 4-3) July 3, 2013 July 15, 2013 Completion of claim construction discovery (Patent L.R. 4-4) July 18, 2013 No change 13 Opening claim construction brief (Patent L.R. 4-5(a)) July 25, 2013 No change 14 Opposing claim construction brief (Patent L.R. 4-5(b)) August 15, 2013 No change 16 Reply claim construction brief (Patent L.R. 4-5(c)) August 23, 2013 No change 17 Technology tutorial September 12, 2013 No change 18 Claim construction hearing (Patent L.R. 4-6) September 19, 2013 No change 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 15 19 20 The proposed modifications do not affect the technology tutorial and claim construction hearing 21 dates or reduce the time available to the Court to review materials between the conclusion of claim 22 construction briefing and the claim construction hearing. 23 Accordingly, Novell and SoftVault, by and through their respective undersigned counsel, 24 respectfully request that the Court enter an order modifying the schedule as set forth above. 25 Undersigned counsel for Novell attests that she has obtained the concurrence of below identified 26 counsel for SoftVault in the filing of this document. 27 28 STIPULATED MOTION TO MODIFY SCHEDULE 2 CASE NO. 5:12-CV-05541-LHK Case5:12-cv-05541-LHK Document40 Filed05/29/13 Page3 of 5 1 DATED: May 29, 2013 TURNER BOYD LLP 2 By /s/ Karen Boyd Karen Boyd Attorney for Defendant Novell, Inc. 3 4 5 6 DATED: May 29, 2013 FRIEDMAN, SUDER & COOKE 7 By /s/ Corby R. Vowell (with permission) Corby R. Vowell, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiff SoftVault Systems, Inc. 8 9 10 11 12 [Proposed] ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES, IT IS SO ORDERED. 13 14 May 29, DATED: __________________ 2013 15 By 16 Lucy H. Koh UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATED MOTION TO MODIFY SCHEDULE 3 CASE NO. 5:12-CV-05541-LHK Case5:12-cv-05541-LHK Document40 Filed05/29/13 Page4 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Local Rule 6-2(a) Declaration Pursuant to Local Rule 6-2(a), Novell’s undersigned counsel declares, under penalties of perjury under the laws of the United States of America (and using terms as defined in the foregoing “Stipulated Motion to Modify Schedule”), that: 1. The reasons for seeking the continuances requested by the Stipulated Motion to Modify Schedule are twofold. First, Novell has recently requested some additional time in light of having retained new counsel. Second, Novell and SoftVault have scheduled a mediation for June 5, 2013, and approving the modifications requested in this Stipulated Motion to Modify Schedule will increase the likelihood that the dispute may be resolved before substantive engagement of the issues by the Court. 2. On May 1, 2013, Novell and SoftVault stipulated to modify certain deadlines contained in the Court’s February 24, 2013 Scheduling Order. 3. The modifications requested by the Motion to Modify Schedule will not affect the schedule for the Action other than as set forth in the Motion to Modify Schedule. 15 /s/ Karen Boyd 16 Karen Boyd 17 Karen I. Boyd boyd@turnerboyd.com TURNER BOYD LLP 2570 W. El Camino Real, Suite 380 Mountain View, California 94040 Telephone: (650) 521-5930 Facsimile: (650) 521-5931 18 19 20 21 Respectfully Submitted, 22 TURNER BOYD LLP 23 Dated: May 29, 2013 /s/ Karen I. Boyd Karen I. Boyd (SBN 189808) boyd@turnerboyd.com Zhuanjia Gu (SBN 244863) gu@turnerboyd.com TURNER BOYD LLP 2570 W. El Camino Real, Suite 380 Mountain View, California 94040 Telephone: (650) 521-5930 Facsimile: (650) 521-5931 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATED MOTION TO MODIFY SCHEDULE 4 CASE NO. 5:12-CV-05541-LHK

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?