Softvault Systems, Inc. v. Novell, Inc.
Filing
41
Order by Hon. Lucy H. Koh granting 40 Stipulation to Modify Schedule.(lhklc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/29/2013)
Case5:12-cv-05541-LHK Document40 Filed05/29/13 Page1 of 5
1
2
3
4
5
6
Karen I, Boyd (SBN 189808)
boyd@turnerboyd.com
Zhuanjia Gu (SBN 244863)
gu@turnerboyd.com
TURNER BOYD LLP
2570 W. El Camino Real, Suite 380
Mountain View, California 94040
Telephone: (650) 521-5930
Facsimile: (650) 521-5931
Attorneys for Defendant
Novell, Inc.
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
SAN JOSE DIVISION
10
SOFTVAULT SYSTEMS, INC.,
Civil Case No. 5:12-cv-05541-LHK
11
Plaintiff,
STIPULATED MOTION TO MODIFY
SCHEDULE, PROPOSED ORDER,
AND DECLARATION OF COUNSEL
12
vs.
13
NOVELL, INC.,
14
Defendant.
15
STIPULATED MOTION
16
17
18
19
20
On February 4, 2013, the Court entered its “Minute Order and Case Management Order”
(“Scheduling Order,” ECF No. 23) in the above-captioned action (“Action”) and in two companion
actions: SoftVault Systems, Inc. v. Research in Motion, Case No. 12-CV-5544 LHK (“RIM Action”)
and SoftVault Systems, Inc. v. International Business Machines Corporation, Case No. 12-CV-5546
LHK (“IBM Action”). The RIM Action has since settled and been dismissed.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
On March 22, 2013, the Court entered a “Modified Scheduling Order” (“Scheduling Order,”
ECF No. 32) in the above-captioned action (“Action”). In the last month, Defendant Novell, Inc.
(“Novell”) retained the above-named counsel and the parties agreed to participate in mediation on
Wednesday, June 5, 2013. In light of Novell’s new counsel and the upcoming mediation, the parties
stipulate to the below request that the Court continue certain deadlines imposed by the Scheduling
Order.
Specifically, Novell and Plaintiff SoftVault Systems, Inc. (“SoftVault”) move the Court to
modify the Scheduling Order as set forth in the following table:
STIPULATED MOTION TO
MODIFY SCHEDULE
1
CASE NO. 5:12-CV-05541-LHK
Case5:12-cv-05541-LHK Document40 Filed05/29/13 Page2 of 5
1
2
Event
Modified Scheduling
Order
Proposed Schedule
Last day to amend pleadings
May 30, 2013
No change
Invalidity contentions and
accompanying document
production (Patent L.R. 3-3, 3-4)
May 30, 2013
June 21, 2013
Exchange of proposed terms for
construction (Patent L.R. 4-1)
June 6, 2013
July 1, 2013
Exchange of preliminary claim
constructions and extrinsic
evidence (Patent L.R. 4-2)
June 20, 2013
July 8, 2013
Joint claim construction and
prehearing statement
(Patent L.R. 4-3)
July 3, 2013
July 15, 2013
Completion of claim construction
discovery (Patent L.R. 4-4)
July 18, 2013
No change
13
Opening claim construction brief
(Patent L.R. 4-5(a))
July 25, 2013
No change
14
Opposing claim construction brief
(Patent L.R. 4-5(b))
August 15, 2013
No change
16
Reply claim construction brief
(Patent L.R. 4-5(c))
August 23, 2013
No change
17
Technology tutorial
September 12, 2013
No change
18
Claim construction hearing
(Patent L.R. 4-6)
September 19, 2013
No change
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
15
19
20
The proposed modifications do not affect the technology tutorial and claim construction hearing
21
dates or reduce the time available to the Court to review materials between the conclusion of claim
22
construction briefing and the claim construction hearing.
23
Accordingly, Novell and SoftVault, by and through their respective undersigned counsel,
24
respectfully request that the Court enter an order modifying the schedule as set forth above.
25
Undersigned counsel for Novell attests that she has obtained the concurrence of below identified
26
counsel for SoftVault in the filing of this document.
27
28
STIPULATED MOTION TO MODIFY
SCHEDULE
2
CASE NO. 5:12-CV-05541-LHK
Case5:12-cv-05541-LHK Document40 Filed05/29/13 Page3 of 5
1
DATED: May 29, 2013
TURNER BOYD LLP
2
By /s/ Karen Boyd
Karen Boyd
Attorney for Defendant Novell, Inc.
3
4
5
6
DATED: May 29, 2013
FRIEDMAN, SUDER & COOKE
7
By /s/ Corby R. Vowell (with permission)
Corby R. Vowell, Esq.
Attorneys for Plaintiff SoftVault Systems, Inc.
8
9
10
11
12
[Proposed] ORDER
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES, IT IS SO ORDERED.
13
14
May 29,
DATED: __________________ 2013
15
By
16
Lucy H. Koh
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATED MOTION TO MODIFY
SCHEDULE
3
CASE NO. 5:12-CV-05541-LHK
Case5:12-cv-05541-LHK Document40 Filed05/29/13 Page4 of 5
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Local Rule 6-2(a) Declaration
Pursuant to Local Rule 6-2(a), Novell’s undersigned counsel declares, under penalties of
perjury under the laws of the United States of America (and using terms as defined in the foregoing
“Stipulated Motion to Modify Schedule”), that:
1. The reasons for seeking the continuances requested by the Stipulated Motion to Modify
Schedule are twofold. First, Novell has recently requested some additional time in light
of having retained new counsel. Second, Novell and SoftVault have scheduled a
mediation for June 5, 2013, and approving the modifications requested in this Stipulated
Motion to Modify Schedule will increase the likelihood that the dispute may be resolved
before substantive engagement of the issues by the Court.
2. On May 1, 2013, Novell and SoftVault stipulated to modify certain deadlines contained
in the Court’s February 24, 2013 Scheduling Order.
3. The modifications requested by the Motion to Modify Schedule will not affect the
schedule for the Action other than as set forth in the Motion to Modify Schedule.
15
/s/ Karen Boyd
16
Karen Boyd
17
Karen I. Boyd
boyd@turnerboyd.com
TURNER BOYD LLP
2570 W. El Camino Real, Suite 380
Mountain View, California 94040
Telephone: (650) 521-5930
Facsimile: (650) 521-5931
18
19
20
21
Respectfully Submitted,
22
TURNER BOYD LLP
23
Dated: May 29, 2013
/s/ Karen I. Boyd
Karen I. Boyd (SBN 189808)
boyd@turnerboyd.com
Zhuanjia Gu (SBN 244863)
gu@turnerboyd.com
TURNER BOYD LLP
2570 W. El Camino Real, Suite 380
Mountain View, California 94040
Telephone: (650) 521-5930
Facsimile: (650) 521-5931
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATED MOTION TO MODIFY
SCHEDULE
4
CASE NO. 5:12-CV-05541-LHK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?