Mahinan et al v. Alliance Bankcorp et al
Filing
8
Order by Hon. Ronald M. Whyte adopting Report and Recommendations as to 6 Report and Recommendations(rmwlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/11/2013)
1
2
3
4
E-FILED on
2/11/13
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
8
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
12
FREDDIE MAHINAN, et al.,
13
14
15
No. C-12-5587 RMW
Plaintiffs,
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING
PLAINTIFFS' COMPLAINT
v.
ALLIANCE BANKCORP, et al.,
[Re Docket No. 6]
16
Defendants.
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
On December 18, 2012, plaintiffs failed to appear for a case management conference. The
court ordered plaintiff to show cause in writing by January 25, 2013 for why the case should not be
dismissed for failure to prosecute. Plaintiffs have taken no further steps in this case, and the
deadline to show cause has now passed. On January 28, 2013, the magistrate judge ordered that the
case be reassigned to a district judge and issued a report and recommendation that the complaint be
dismissed for failure to prosecute. Dkt. No. 6. The case is now before the undersigned. The court
having reviewed the magistrate judge's report and there being no objections filed, the court adopts
25
26
27
28
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING PLAINTIFFS' COMPLAINT—No. C-12-5587 RMW
ALG
1
the magistrate judge's report and recommendation in full and hereby ORDERS that plaintiffs'
2
complaint is dismissed for failure to prosecute.
3
4
5
6
DATED:
February 11, 2013
RONALD M. WHYTE
United States District Judge
7
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING PLAINTIFFS' COMPLAINT—No. C-12-5587 RMW
ALG
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?