Vardanyan v. Moroyan et al

Filing 121

ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 3/31/2015. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/31/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN JOSE DIVISION United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 ARAM VARDANYAN, an individual, Case No. 5:12-cv-05645 HRL Plaintiff, 13 14 ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE v. 15 ANTHONY MOROYAN, an individual; ALPHA VENTURES, LLC; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, 16 Defendants. 17 ARAM VARDANYAN, individually, 18 19 Counterclaimant, v. 20 21 22 VIASPHERE INTERNATIONAL, INC., a California corporation, Counterdefendant. 23 24 At a March 31, 2015 status conference in a related case, counsel for Aram Vardanyan 25 represented to the court that he had authority to dismiss the instant matter with prejudice, no 26 strings attached. Defendants stated they had no objection. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT 27 this case is dismissed with prejudice. All pending motions are terminated, and all previously 28 1 scheduled deadlines and appearances are VACATED. The clerk shall close the file. 2 SO ORDERED. 3 Dated: March 31, 2015 4 5 ______________________________________ HOWARD R. LLOYD UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 1 2 5:12-cv-05645-HRL Notice has been electronically mailed to: Ara Aroustamian ara@lawaa.com 3 Helene Anastasia Simvoulakis hsimvoulakis@pahl-mccay.com, manaya@pahl-mccay.com 4 5 6 Kevin John Murphy kmurphy@adrservices.org Stephen Donald Pahl spahl@pahl-mccay.com, drinnert@pahl-mccay.com, fhorton@pahlmccay.com, sshah@pahl-mccay.com, tmeek@pahl-mccay.com 7 Varand Vartanian Varand@lawaa.com 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?