ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Plaintiff was granted a thirty day extension on December 27, 2012. The deadline has passed and Plaintiff has not filed the required documents. Accordingly, Plaintiff's case is DISMISSED. The Clerk shall terminate any pending motions and close the file. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 2/13/2013. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/14/2013)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
IN RE ALFRED KIDD,
No. C 12-05692 EJD (PR)
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
On November 6, 2012, Plaintiff filed a letter that was construed as an action
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On the same day, the Clerk sent Plaintiff a notice that he
had not file an In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) application or a proper complaint and they
needed to be filed within thirty days or else the case would be dismissed. (Docs. No. 2,
3.) Plaintiff was granted a thirty day extension on December 27, 2012. The deadline has
passed and Plaintiff has not filed the required documents. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s case is
The Clerk shall terminate any pending motions and close the file.
EDWARD J. DAVILA
United States District Judge
Order of Dismissal
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
IN RE ALFRED KIDD,
Case Number CV 12-05692 EJD (PR)
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S.
District Court, Northern District of California.
That on ______________________________, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the
attached, by placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the
person(s)hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said
copy(ies) inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office.
Alfred R. Kidd
California Men's Colony State Prison
P. O. Box 8101
San Luis Obispo, CA 93409-8101
Richard W. Wieking, Clerk
/s/By: Elizabeth Garcia, Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?