Palmer v. Palisades Collections, LLC
Filing
13
ORDER re 11 Stipulation filed by Palisades Collections, LLC Extending Time to Respond to the Complaint. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 1/02/13. (lhklc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/2/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
SAN JOSE DIVISION
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
BRUCE PALMER,
Plaintiff,
v.
PALISADES COLLECTIONS, LLC, and
DOES 1 through 10, inclusive,
Defendants.
14
15
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 12-CV-05751-LHK
ORDER GRANTING SECOND
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO
RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
16
Plaintiff Bruce Palmer filed this action on November 8, 2012, against Defendants Palisades
17
Collections, LLC, and Does 1 through 10, alleging claims for violation of the Fair Debt Collection
18
Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1692, and violation of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, Cal. Civ.
19
Code § 1788. See ECF No. 1. On December 6, 2012, the parties filed a Stipulation to Extend
20
Time to Respond to the Complaint to December 28, 2012. ECF No. 6. On December 21, 2012, the
21
parties filed a Second Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint to January 11, 2013.
22
ECF No. 11. Although the Court GRANTS the parties’ Second Stipulation to Extend Time to
23
Respond to the Complaint, ECF No. 11, further extensions will be disfavored.
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
Dated: January 2, 2013
26
_________________________________
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge
27
28
Case No.: 12-CV-04811-LHK
ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?