Palmer v. Palisades Collections, LLC

Filing 13

ORDER re 11 Stipulation filed by Palisades Collections, LLC Extending Time to Respond to the Complaint. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 1/02/13. (lhklc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/2/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 SAN JOSE DIVISION 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 BRUCE PALMER, Plaintiff, v. PALISADES COLLECTIONS, LLC, and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, Defendants. 14 15 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 12-CV-05751-LHK ORDER GRANTING SECOND STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 16 Plaintiff Bruce Palmer filed this action on November 8, 2012, against Defendants Palisades 17 Collections, LLC, and Does 1 through 10, alleging claims for violation of the Fair Debt Collection 18 Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1692, and violation of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, Cal. Civ. 19 Code § 1788. See ECF No. 1. On December 6, 2012, the parties filed a Stipulation to Extend 20 Time to Respond to the Complaint to December 28, 2012. ECF No. 6. On December 21, 2012, the 21 parties filed a Second Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint to January 11, 2013. 22 ECF No. 11. Although the Court GRANTS the parties’ Second Stipulation to Extend Time to 23 Respond to the Complaint, ECF No. 11, further extensions will be disfavored. 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 Dated: January 2, 2013 26 _________________________________ LUCY H. KOH United States District Judge 27 28 Case No.: 12-CV-04811-LHK ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?