Stamps v. Grounds
Filing
60
ORDER OF INSTRUCTION REGARDING COUNSEL'S MOTION TO WITHDRAW re 59 MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney with Proposed Order filed by Keith Stamps. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 11/1/2018. (tshS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/1/2018)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
KEITH STAMPS,
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Petitioner,
12
ORDER OF INSTRUCTION
REGARDING COUNSEL’S
MOTION TO WITHDRAW
v.
13
14
15
Case No. 12-05753 BLF (PR)
RANDY GROUNDS,
Respondent.
(Docket No. 59)
16
17
18
Petitioner, a state prisoner, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28
19
U.S.C. § 2254. On September 5, 2018, the Court terminated the appointment of Mr. David
20
L. Plotsky as counsel for Petitioner but stated that Mr. Plotsky would remain attorney of
21
record for this action unless and until he files a motion to withdraw as counsel. (Docket
22
No. 58.) On October 29, 2018, Mr. Plotsky filed a motion to withdraw as counsel.
23
(Docket No. 59.)
24
Before the Court grants the motion, Mr. Plotsky is directed to provide a confirmed
25
current address for Petitioner, Mr. Keith Stamps, and a certificate of service showing that
26
Petitioner was served with counsel’s motion to withdraw. Counsel shall respond in
27
accordance with this motion within fourteen (14) days from the date this order is filed.
28
Upon receipt of counsel’s response in accordance with this order, the Court shall grant the
1
2
3
motion to withdraw as counsel.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: November 1, 2018
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Order Re Counsel’s Mot. to Withdraw
P:\PRO-SE\BLF\HC.12\05753Stamps_inst.counsel
26
27
28
________________________
BETH LABSON FREEMAN
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?