Stamps v. Grounds

Filing 60

ORDER OF INSTRUCTION REGARDING COUNSEL'S MOTION TO WITHDRAW re 59 MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney with Proposed Order filed by Keith Stamps. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 11/1/2018. (tshS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/1/2018)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KEITH STAMPS, United States District Court Northern District of California Petitioner, 12 ORDER OF INSTRUCTION REGARDING COUNSEL’S MOTION TO WITHDRAW v. 13 14 15 Case No. 12-05753 BLF (PR) RANDY GROUNDS, Respondent. (Docket No. 59) 16 17 18 Petitioner, a state prisoner, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 19 U.S.C. § 2254. On September 5, 2018, the Court terminated the appointment of Mr. David 20 L. Plotsky as counsel for Petitioner but stated that Mr. Plotsky would remain attorney of 21 record for this action unless and until he files a motion to withdraw as counsel. (Docket 22 No. 58.) On October 29, 2018, Mr. Plotsky filed a motion to withdraw as counsel. 23 (Docket No. 59.) 24 Before the Court grants the motion, Mr. Plotsky is directed to provide a confirmed 25 current address for Petitioner, Mr. Keith Stamps, and a certificate of service showing that 26 Petitioner was served with counsel’s motion to withdraw. Counsel shall respond in 27 accordance with this motion within fourteen (14) days from the date this order is filed. 28 Upon receipt of counsel’s response in accordance with this order, the Court shall grant the 1 2 3 motion to withdraw as counsel. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 1, 2018 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Order Re Counsel’s Mot. to Withdraw P:\PRO-SE\BLF\HC.12\05753Stamps_inst.counsel 26 27 28 ________________________ BETH LABSON FREEMAN United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?