Stamps v. Grounds
Filing
65
ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE ANSWER by Judge Beth Labson Freeman. Granting 64 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re 64 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply Application for Extension of Time to File Response to OSC.Answer due by 2/28/2019. Traverse due no later than thrity (30) days of receipt of the answer. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(tshS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/29/2019)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
KEITH STAMPS,
Petitioner,
9
v.
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
Case No. 12-05753 BLF (PR)
ORDER GRANTING
APPLICATION FOR AN
EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE
ANSWER
RANDY GROUNDS, Warden,
Respondent.
(Docket No. 64)
13
14
15
Petitioner, a California prisoner, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant
16
to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On November 30, 2018, the Court issued an order directing
17
Respondent to show cause why a writ of habeas corpus should not be granted. (Docket
18
No. 63.) Respondent has filed an application for a 30-day extension of time to file an
19
answer. (Docket No. 64.)
20
Having shown good cause, Respondent’s application is GRANTED. Respondent
21
shall file an answer no later than February 28, 2019. Petitioner shall file a traverse no
22
later than thirty (30) days of his receipt of the answer.
23
This order terminates Docket No. 64.
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
January 29, 2019
Dated: _____________________
26
27
28
Order Granting Ext. of Time to File Ans.
P:\PRO-SE\BLF\HC.12\05753Stamps_eot-ans.docx
________________________
BETH LABSON FREEMAN
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?