Stamps v. Grounds

Filing 65

ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE ANSWER by Judge Beth Labson Freeman. Granting 64 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re 64 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply Application for Extension of Time to File Response to OSC.Answer due by 2/28/2019. Traverse due no later than thrity (30) days of receipt of the answer. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(tshS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/29/2019)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 KEITH STAMPS, Petitioner, 9 v. 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 Case No. 12-05753 BLF (PR) ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE ANSWER RANDY GROUNDS, Warden, Respondent. (Docket No. 64) 13 14 15 Petitioner, a California prisoner, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant 16 to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On November 30, 2018, the Court issued an order directing 17 Respondent to show cause why a writ of habeas corpus should not be granted. (Docket 18 No. 63.) Respondent has filed an application for a 30-day extension of time to file an 19 answer. (Docket No. 64.) 20 Having shown good cause, Respondent’s application is GRANTED. Respondent 21 shall file an answer no later than February 28, 2019. Petitioner shall file a traverse no 22 later than thirty (30) days of his receipt of the answer. 23 This order terminates Docket No. 64. 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 January 29, 2019 Dated: _____________________ 26 27 28 Order Granting Ext. of Time to File Ans. P:\PRO-SE\BLF\HC.12\05753Stamps_eot-ans.docx ________________________ BETH LABSON FREEMAN United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?