Pretscher-Johnson v. Aurora Bank FSB et al

Filing 25

ORDER RE STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT re 24 Request filed by Quality Loan Service Corp, Marianne Pretscher-Johnson. Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on April 4, 2013. (psglc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/4/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SAN JOSE DIVISION United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 15 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 16 On March 27, 2013, Defendant Quality Loan Services Corp. (“QLSC”) and Plaintiff 11 MARIANNE PRETSCHER-JOHNSON, Plaintiff, 12 13 v. AURORA BANK FSB, et al, 14 17 Defendants. Case No.: 12-cv-5817 PSG ORDER RE: STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (Re: Docket No. 24) Marianne Pretscher-Johnson (“Pretscher-Johnson”) stipulated to extend time to respond to 18 Pretscher-Johnson’s first amended complaint (“FAC”). On March 15, 2013, however, Pretscher19 20 21 Johnson filed a second amended complaint (“SAC”) on which she intends to proceed in this case. 1 The court currently is considering whether to give her leave to amend to file the SAC. Because determination of that motion will confirm on which complaint the case will move 22 23 forward, QLSC should not respond until after the court has made that decision. The court therefore 24 orders QLSC to respond to the operative complaint, as determined by the court in the forthcoming 25 order on Pretscher-Johnson’s motion for leave to amend, no later than fourteen days after the court 26 issues its decision. 27 28 1 See Docket Nos. 18, 23. 1 Case No.: 12-5817 PSG ORDER 1 2 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 4, 2013 _________________________________ PAUL S. GREWAL United States Magistrate Judge 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Case No.: 12-5817 PSG ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?