Pretscher-Johnson v. Aurora Bank FSB et al
Filing
25
ORDER RE STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT re 24 Request filed by Quality Loan Service Corp, Marianne Pretscher-Johnson. Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on April 4, 2013. (psglc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/4/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
SAN JOSE DIVISION
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
15
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
16
On March 27, 2013, Defendant Quality Loan Services Corp. (“QLSC”) and Plaintiff
11
MARIANNE PRETSCHER-JOHNSON,
Plaintiff,
12
13
v.
AURORA BANK FSB, et al,
14
17
Defendants.
Case No.: 12-cv-5817 PSG
ORDER RE: STIPULATION TO
EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO
FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
(Re: Docket No. 24)
Marianne Pretscher-Johnson (“Pretscher-Johnson”) stipulated to extend time to respond to
18
Pretscher-Johnson’s first amended complaint (“FAC”). On March 15, 2013, however, Pretscher19
20
21
Johnson filed a second amended complaint (“SAC”) on which she intends to proceed in this case. 1
The court currently is considering whether to give her leave to amend to file the SAC.
Because determination of that motion will confirm on which complaint the case will move
22
23
forward, QLSC should not respond until after the court has made that decision. The court therefore
24
orders QLSC to respond to the operative complaint, as determined by the court in the forthcoming
25
order on Pretscher-Johnson’s motion for leave to amend, no later than fourteen days after the court
26
issues its decision.
27
28
1
See Docket Nos. 18, 23.
1
Case No.: 12-5817 PSG
ORDER
1
2
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 4, 2013
_________________________________
PAUL S. GREWAL
United States Magistrate Judge
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Case No.: 12-5817 PSG
ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?