Pretscher-Johnson v. Aurora Bank FSB et al
Filing
38
ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF'S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT. Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on February 21, 2014. (psglc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/21/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
SAN JOSE DIVISION
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
MARIANNE PRETSCHER-JOHNSON,
12
Plaintiff,
v.
13
14
AURORA BANK FSB, et al.,
Defendants.
15
16
17
18
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 5:12-cv-05817-PSG
ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S SECOND
AMENDED COMPLAINT
(Re: Docket Nos. 10 and 26)
Before the court are Defendants’ respective motions to dismiss.1 The motions as submitted
challenge Plaintiff’s first amended complaint. Rather than oppose the motion, Plaintiff countered
with a second amended complaint without seeking leave of the court. 2 Weighing the equities of
19
20
this unusual procedural response, the court dismissed the FAC and ordered Plaintiff to show cause
21
why the case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. 3 Plaintiff responded with an
22
explanation for her failure to appear or oppose Defendants’ motion. 4 The court then dissolved the
23
OSC and elected to consider the merits of Plaintiff’s SAC in light of the briefing submitted without
24
25
1
See Docket Nos. 10 and 26.
26
2
See Docket No. 18.
27
3
See Docket No. 29.
28
4
See Docket No. 35.
1
Case No. 5:12-cv-05817-PSG
ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?