Good Technology Corporation et al v. MobileIron, Inc.
Filing
522
[PROPOSED] VERDICT FORM Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on July 28, 2015 (psglc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/28/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN JOSE DIVISION
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
GOOD TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION AND )
GOOD TECHNOLOGY SOFTWARE, INC.,
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
v.
)
)
MOBILEIRON, INC.,
)
)
Defendant.
)
)
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
Case No. 5:12-cv-05826-PSG
[PROPOSED] VERDICT FORM
Case No. 5:12-cv-05826-PSG
[PROPOSED] VERDICT FORM
VERDICT FORM
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
When answering the following questions and filling out this verdict form, please follow the
directions provided throughout the form. Your answer to each question must be unanimous. Some
of the questions contain legal terms that are defined and explained in detail in the jury instructions.
Please refer to the jury instructions if you are unsure about the meaning or usage of any legal term
that appears in the questions below.
Part A.
GOOD TECHNOLOGY’S FALSE ADVERTISING CLAIM
1. Has Good Technology proven by a preponderance of the evidence that
MobileIron made a false or misleading statement of fact in a commercial
statement about the nature or quality of Good Technology’s products, services, or
commercial activities?
___________
Yes
___________
No
2. Has Good Technology proven by a preponderance of the evidence that
MobileIron caused the false or misleading statement to enter interstate
commerce?
___________
Yes
___________
No
If your answer to both Questions 1 and 2 is “Yes,” then please proceed to Question 3. If your
answer to either Question 1 or 2 is “No,” proceed directly to Part B.
16
17
18
19
20
3. Has Good Technology proven by a preponderance of the evidence that any such
statement was deliberately false?
___________
Yes
___________
No
If your answer to Question 3 is “Yes,” then please proceed to Question 4. If your answer to
Question 3 is “No,” proceed directly to Question 5.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
4. Has MobileIron shown there is evidence that the false statement did not deceive
a substantial segment of Good Technology’s customers and that there is evidence
that the false statement did not likely influence the purchasing decisions of
customers?
___________
Yes
___________
No
If your answer to Question 4 is “Yes,” then please proceed to Question 5. If your answer to
Question 4 is “No,” proceed directly to Question 7.
28
2
Case No. 5:12-cv-05826-PSG
[PROPOSED] VERDICT FORM
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
5. Has Good Technology proven by a preponderance of the evidence both that the
false or misleading statement actually deceived or had a tendency to deceive a
substantial segment of Good Technology’s customers and that the false or
misleading statement likely influenced the purchasing decisions of customers?
___________
Yes
___________
No
If your answer to Question 5 is “Yes,” then please proceed to Question 6. If your answer to
Question 5 is “No,” proceed directly to Part B.
6. Has Good Technology proven by a preponderance of the evidence that the false
or misleading statement caused Good Technology to be damaged by a diversion
of sales or loss of goodwill?
___________
Yes
___________
No
If your answer to Question 6 is “Yes,” then please proceed to Question 7. If your answer to
Question 6 is “No,” proceed directly to Part B.
7. Has MobileIron proven by a preponderance of the evidence that Good
Technology made false or misleading representations related to the subject matter
of its false advertising claim to an extent that it would be unfair to allow Good
Technology to enforce its claim?
___________
Yes
___________
No
If your answer to Question 7 is “Yes,” proceed directly to Part B. If your answer to Question 7 is
“No,” proceed directly to Question 8.
18
19
20
21
8. What amount of damages has Good Technology proven are attributable to
MobileIron’s false or misleading statement?
Total Damages:
$________________
Please proceed to Part B.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Case No. 5:12-cv-05826-PSG
[PROPOSED] VERDICT FORM
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?