Song v. County of Santa Clara et al

Filing 22

STIPULATION AND ORDER 21 for Continuance of Case Management Conference: Case Management Conference set for 1/10/2014 10:30 AM in Courtroom 6, 4th Floor, San Jose. Revised Case Management Statement due 1/3/2014. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 10/31/13. (jgS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/31/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 CHARLES A. BONNER, ESQ. SB# 85413 A. CABRAL BONNER, ESQ. SB# 247528 LAW OFFICES OF CHARLES A. BONNER 475 GATE FIVE RD, SUITE 212 SAUSALITO, CA 94965 TEL: (415) 331-3070 FAX: (415) 331-2738 cbonner799@aol.com cabral@bonnerlaw.com 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 HUIMIN SONG, Plaintiff, 12 13 No. CV12-05848 RMW STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE v. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA; SANTA CLARA VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER; PAUL 15 ESTESS, ANNA HUGHES; and Does 1 through 70, 14 16 Defendants. 17 18 /// 19 /// 20 /// 21 /// 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// Stipulation and Order for Continuance of CMC 1 CV12-05848 RMW The parties, through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree to an order 1 2 Continuing the Case Managament Conference presently scheduled for November 1, 2013 at 10:30 3 AM in Corutroom 6, 4th Floor, San Jose CA. 4 Good cause exists for this enlargement of time (60 additional days). Song and the County of 5 Santa Clara are involved in litigation in the matter of Huimin Song and Andy Xie v. County of Santa 6 Clara, Santa Clara Valley Medical Center, et. al., Case No. CV11-04450, pending before United 7 States District Judge Edward J. Davila. The parties are also waiting the ruling in this matter on 8 Defendants’ pending Summary Judgment Motion, which will impact the settlement discussion now 9 in progress. 10 The parties have been engaged in private mediation since January 16, 2013 with mediator 11 Kael Briski of the Briski Mediation Group. Since the initial mediation on January 16, the parties and 12 Mr. Briski have had countless email communications, two face to face discussions and no less than 13 twelve phone conferences. 14 exchanged. The parties are in the process of scheduling another mediation session with Mr. Briski, 15 which will be take place in the next 30 days. The settlement discussions have involved resolution of 16 all issues, including the allegations giving rise to this lawsuit, between Song and the County. The 17 parties are hopeful that both lawsuits will be resolved at this upcoming mediation. Settlement demands, offers and terms of resolution have been 18 The parties request 60 days to allow sufficient time for both the ruling on the summary 19 judgment, and to complete the mediation in all matters. The parties are optimistic that mediation will 20 result in a resolution of all matters, obviating the necessity of any further litigation between these 21 parties. 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// Stipulation and Order for Continuance of CMC 2 CV12-05848 RMW I hereby attest that I have on file the holograph signature indicated by a “conformed” 1 2 signature (/S/) within this e-filed document. 3 IT IS SO STIPULATED 4 Respectfully submitted, 5 LAW OFFICES OF BONNER & BONNER 6 Dated: October 31, 2013 By: 7 8 /S/ CHARLES A. BONNER, ESQ. Attorney for Plaintiff HUIMIN SONG 9 ORRY P. KORB County Counsel 10 11 Dated: October 31, 2013 12 By: /S/ JOHN L. WINCHESTER, III Deputy County Counsel Attorneys for Defendant COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA and Its Santa Clara Valley Medical Center, PAUL ESTESS AND ANNA HUGHES 13 14 15 ORDER 16 The Case Management Conference is continued to January 10, 2014 at10:30 a.m. The Joint 17 18 Case Management Statement is to be filed no later than January 3, 2014. 19 20 Dated: HONORABLE RONALD M. WHYTE United States District Court Judge 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 729215 Stipulation and Order for Continuance of CMC 3 CV12-05848 RMW

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?