Hardaway v. Franco
Filing
12
ORDER OF SERVICE; Directing Defendant to File Dispositive Motion or Notice Regarding Such Motion. Habeas Answer or Dispositive Motion due by 9/24/2013. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 7/25/13. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/26/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
SONNY RAY HARDAWAY,
13
Plaintiff,
14
15
v.
Y. FRANCO,
16
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. C 12-5885 RMW (PR)
ORDER OF SERVICE; DIRECTING
DEFENDANT TO FILE
DISPOSITIVE MOTION OR
NOTICE REGARDING SUCH
MOTION
17
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed an amended federal civil rights
18
complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. For the reasons that follow, the court orders service
19
upon defendant.
20
DISCUSSION
21
A.
Standard of Review
22
A federal court must conduct a preliminary screening in any case in which a prisoner
23
seeks redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. See
24
28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). In its review, the court must identify any cognizable claims and dismiss
25
any claims that are frivolous, malicious, fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted or
26
seek monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. See id. § 1915A(b)(1),
27
(2). Pro se pleadings must, however, be liberally construed. See Balistreri v. Pacifica Police
28
Order of Service; Directing Defendant to File Dispositive Motion or Notice Regarding Such Motion
G:\PRO-SE\RMW\CR.12\Hardaway885srv.wpd
1
Dep’t, 901 F.2d 696, 699 (9th Cir. 1988).
2
To state a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, a plaintiff must allege two essential elements:
3
(1) that a right secured by the Constitution or laws of the United States was violated, and (2) that
4
the alleged deprivation was committed by a person acting under the color of state law. West v.
5
Atkins, 487 U.S. 42, 48 (1988).
6
B.
Plaintiff’s Claims
7
Plaintiff sues prison official, Y. Franco. Plaintiff alleges that he was transported in waist
8
chains to the prison hospital for x-rays on his “torn shoulder.” After the appointment, defendant
9
Franco ordered plaintiff to place his hands behind his back so that Franco could handcuff him.
10
Plaintiff told Franco that he had a shoulder injury and could not be in handcuffs. Franco
11
threatened plaintiff, and handcuffed plaintiff anyway. Plaintiff alleges that the handcuffing
12
caused his torn shoulder serious pain. Liberally construed, plaintiff states a cognizable claim of
13
deliberate indifference to serious medical needs.
14
CONCLUSION
15
For the foregoing reasons, the court orders:
16
1.
The clerk of the court shall mail a Notice of Lawsuit and Request for Waiver of
17
Service of Summons, two copies of the Waiver of Service of Summons, a copy of the amended
18
complaint and all attachments thereto (docket no. 11), and a copy of this order to Correctional
19
Officer Y. Franco at SVSP.
20
The clerk of the court shall also mail a courtesy copy of the complaint and a copy of this
21
order to the California Attorney General’s Office. Additionally, the clerk shall mail a copy of
22
this order to plaintiff.
23
2.
Defendant is cautioned that Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
24
requires them to cooperate in saving unnecessary costs of service of the summons and complaint.
25
Pursuant to Rule 4, if defendant, after being notified of this action and asked by the court, on
26
behalf of plaintiff, to waive service of the summons, fails to do so, he will be required to bear the
27
cost of such service unless good cause is shown for his failure to sign and return the waiver
28
form. If service is waived, this action will proceed as if defendant had been served on the date
Order of Service; Directing Defendant to File Dispositive Motion or Notice Regarding Such Motion
2
G:\PRO-SE\RMW\CR.12\Hardaway885srv.wpd
1
that the waiver is filed, except that pursuant to Rule 12(a)(1)(B), defendant will not be required
2
to serve and file an answer before sixty (60) days from the date on which the request for waiver
3
was sent. (This allows a longer time to respond than would be required if formal service of
4
summons is necessary.) Defendant is asked to read the statement set forth at the bottom of the
5
waiver form that more completely describes the duties of the parties with regard to waiver of
6
service of the summons. If service is waived after the date provided in the Notice but before
7
defendant has been personally served, the Answer shall be due sixty (60) days from the date on
8
which the request for waiver was sent or twenty (20) days from the date the waiver form is filed,
9
whichever is later.
10
3.
No later than ninety (90) days from the date of this order, defendant shall file a
11
motion for summary judgment or other dispositive motion with respect to the cognizable claim
12
in the complaint.
13
a.
If defendant elects to file a motion to dismiss on the grounds that plaintiff
14
failed to exhaust his available administrative remedies as required by 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a),
15
defendant shall do so in an unenumerated Rule 12(b) motion pursuant to Wyatt v. Terhune, 315
16
F.3d 1108, 1119-20 (9th Cir. 2003).
17
b.
Any motion for summary judgment shall be supported by adequate factual
18
documentation and shall conform in all respects to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil
19
Procedure. Defendant is advised that summary judgment cannot be granted, nor qualified
20
immunity found, if material facts are in dispute. If defendant is of the opinion that this
21
case cannot be resolved by summary judgment, he shall so inform the court prior to the
22
date the summary judgment motion is due.
4.
23
Plaintiff’s opposition to the dispositive motion shall be filed with the court and
24
served on defendant no later than twenty-eight (28) days from the date defendant’s motion is
25
filed. Plaintiff is advised to read Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Celotex
26
Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317 (1986) (holding party opposing summary judgment must come
27
forward with evidence showing triable issues of material fact on every essential element of his
28
claim).
Order of Service; Directing Defendant to File Dispositive Motion or Notice Regarding Such Motion
3
G:\PRO-SE\RMW\CR.12\Hardaway885srv.wpd
1
2
3
4
5
5.
Defendant shall file a reply brief no later than fourteen (14) days after plaintiff’s
opposition is filed.
6.
The motion shall be deemed submitted as of the date the reply brief is due. No
hearing will be held on the motion unless the court so orders at a later date.
7.
All communications by the plaintiff with the court must be served on defendant or
6
defendant’s counsel, by mailing a true copy of the document to defendant or defendant’s
7
counsel.
8
9
10
8.
Discovery may be taken in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
No further court order is required before the parties may conduct discovery.
9.
It is plaintiff’s responsibility to prosecute this case. Plaintiff must keep the court
11
and all parties informed of any change of address and must comply with the court’s orders in a
12
timely fashion. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of this action for failure to prosecute
13
pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).
14
15
16
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED:
RONALD M. WHYTE
United States District Judge
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Order of Service; Directing Defendant to File Dispositive Motion or Notice Regarding Such Motion
4
G:\PRO-SE\RMW\CR.12\Hardaway885srv.wpd
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SONNY RAY HARDAWAY,
Case Number: CV12-05885 RMW
Plaintiff,
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
v.
Y FRANCO et al,
Defendant.
/
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District
Court, Northern District of California.
That on July 26, 2013, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said
copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing
said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery
receptacle located in the Clerk's office.
Sonny Ray Hardaway P-45579
Salinas Valley State Prison
B2-217
PO Box 1050
Soledad, CA 93960
Dated: July 26, 2013
Richard W. Wieking, Clerk
By: Jackie Lynn Garcia, Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?