St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company v. American Safety Indemnity Company et al

Filing 62

Order by Hon. Lucy H. Koh granting 44 Stipulation Extending Time for Defendant Century Surety Company to Respond to the Complaint.(lhklc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/20/2013)

1 LISA DARLING-ALDERTON - State Bar No. 221738

[e-mail]

2 WOOLLS & PEER

A Professional Corporation

3 One Wilshire Boulevard, 22nd Floor

Los Angeles, California 90017

4 Telephone: [phone]
5

Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendant

6 CENTURY SURETY COMPANY
7
8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SAN JOSE DIVISION

11
12 ST. PAUL MERCURY INSURANCE

Case No.: cv 12-5952LHK HRL

A Professional Corporation
One Wilshire Boulevard, 22nd Floor
Los Angeles, California 90017

WOOLLS & PEER

COMPANY,

13

Plaintiff,

15

SECOND STIPULATION
EXTENDING TIME FOR
DEFENDANT CENTURY SURETY
COMPANY TO RESPOND TO THE
COMPLAINT

18

Filing Date:
Trial Date:

14

v.

AMERICAN SAFETY INDEMNITY
16 COMPANY, et al.,
Defendants.
17

19

November 21, 2012
N/A

Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1, Plaintiff, St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company,

20
21 stipulates to a second fourteen (14) day extension of time for Defendant, Century
22 Surety Company to respond to the complaint, to allow the party’s further time to
23

discuss informal resolution. Century Surety Company was served with the complaint

24
25 in this matter on December 12, 2012. On January 2, 2013, this court granted a 28-day
26 extension of time, until January 31, 2013, for Century Surety to respond to the
27

Complaint. The parties expect to have this matter resolved shortly and request 14

28

1
[CASE NO.: CV 12-5952LHK HRL]
SECOND STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR CENTURY SURETY COMPANY TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT

325503.2

February 20, 2013