Technology Licensing Corporation v. Grass Valley USA, Inc
Filing
34
AMENDED ORDER re 33 Order on Stipulation Continuing Case Management Conference and Related Dates. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 6/28/2013. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/28/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
Gregory L. Lippetz (Bar No. 154228)
glippetz@jonesday.com
Laurie M. Charrington (Bar No. 229679)
lmcharrington@jonesday.com
Iman Lordgooei (Bar No. 251320)
ilordgooei@jonesday.com
Heather Fugitt (Bar No. 261588)
hfugitt@jonesday.com
JONES DAY
Silicon Valley Office
1755 Embarcadero Road
Palo Alto, CA 94303
Telephone:
+1.650.739.3939
Facsimile:
+1.650.739.3900
Vicki S. Veenker (Bar No. 158669)
vicki@veenkerlaw.com
VEENKER LAW OFFICES
2091 Barbara Drive
Palo Alto, CA 94303
Telephone: (650) 329-9797
DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP
MARTIN L. FINEMAN, Bar No. 104413
505 Montgomery Street, Suite 800
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: (415) 276-6575
Facsimile: (415) 276-6599
Email: martinfineman@dwt.com
NIRO HALLER & NIRO
RAYMOND P. NIRO (Member of the N.D.
Cal. Bar)
rniro@nshn.com
JOSEPH N. HOSTENY (pro hac vice)
jhosteny@hosteny.com
ARTHUR A. GASEY (pro hac vice)
gasey@nshn.com
181 West Madison Street, Suite 4600
Chicago, Illinois 60602
Telephone: (312) 236-0733
Facsimile: (312) 236-3137
Attorneys for Plaintiff
TECHNOLOGY LICENSING CORP.
Attorneys for Defendant
GRASS VALLEY USA, LLC
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
SAN JOSE DIVISION
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
TECHNOLOGY LICENSING
CORPORATION,
Plaintiff,
v.
GRASS VALLEY USA, LLC,
Case No. 5:12-cv-06060-EJD
AMENDED
JOINT STIPULATION AND
XXXXXXXX
[PROPOSED] ORDER TO
RESCHEDULE CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND
RELATED DATES
Hon. Edward J. Davila
Defendant.
AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION TO RESCHEDULE CMC AND
RELATED DEADLINES
Case No. 5:12-cv-06060-EJD
1
Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-1(b) and 6-2(a), and subject to the Court’s approval, Defendant
2
Grass Valley USA, LLC (“Grass Valley”) and Plaintiff Technology Licensing Corporation
3
(“TLC”) hereby jointly request that the Court extend the dates currently set with respect to the
4
Case Management Conference (“CMC”) scheduled in the above-captioned action.
5
On March 5, 2013, Grass Valley filed its Declination to Proceed Before a Magistrate
6
Judge and Request for Reassignment to a United States District Judge. (ECF No. 21.) On the
7
same day, the above-captioned action was reassigned from the Honorable Maria-Elena James,
8
United States Magistrate Judge, to the Honorable Edward J. Davila, United States District Judge,
9
for all further proceedings. (ECF No. 23.) On March 6, 2013, the Court issued a notice resetting
10
the CMC to July 12, 2013, and setting July 5, 2013, as the deadline for the parties to file their
11
Joint Case Management Statement. (ECF No. 24.)
12
On June 18, 2013, TLC informed Grass Valley that it intends to file a motion to amend its
13
complaint to assert two additional patents in this lawsuit. (Lippetz Decl. at ¶ 1.) The parties
14
therefore agree and hereby stipulate that it would be more efficient to postpone the CMC at least
15
70 days, until it is determined which patents and accused products will be litigated in this lawsuit
16
and the parties’ pleadings related to such patents are complete. In particular, having a final
17
resolution on the number and identity of patents in suit, the asserted claims and accused products,
18
will allow the parties to negotiate, and propose for the Court’s adoption, an appropriate schedule
19
and scope of discovery in this action.
20
Accordingly, in order to permit the parties time to finalize the pleadings, the parties
21
hereby stipulate and jointly request that the Court reset and extend the CMC deadlines under the
22
current schedule, as follows:
23
Initial CMC: a date convenient to the Court’s calendar at least 70 days after the
24
currently scheduled Initial CMC date of July 12, 2013, i.e. no earlier than September
25
20, 2013; and
26
Joint Case Management Statement: 7 days prior to the Initial CMC.
27
28
2
STIPULATION TO RESCHEDULE CMC AND
RELATED DATES
Case No. 5:12-cv-06060-EJD
1
The parties further stipulate to extend the date for commencement of discovery to a date
2
21 days before the extended CMC date, and to extend the date for service of initial disclosures to
3
seven days before the extended CMC date, both subject to the Court’s approval of the extended
4
CMC date.
5
The requested extension will not affect any other Court dates or deadlines in this case.
6
This request for extension is further supported by the Declaration of Gregory L. Lippetz, filed
7
concurrently herewith in accordance with Civil L.R. 6-2(a).
8
9
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
Dated: June 26, 2013
Respectfully submitted,
10
JONES DAY
11
By:
12
/s/Gregory L. Lippetz
Gregory L. Lippetz
Attorneys for Defendant
GRASS VALLEY USA, LLC
13
14
ATTESTATION
15
16
I, Gregory L. Lippetz, an ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this
17
Joint Stipulation to Extend Deadlines Related to Case Management Conference, in compliance
18
with Civil L.R. 5-1(i)(3), hereby attest that Joseph N. Hosteny of Niro, Haller & Niro, attorneys
19
for Technology Licensing Corporation, have concurred with this filing.
20
21
22
Dated: June 26, 2013
NIRO, HALLER & NIRO
By:
23
24
25
/s/ Joseph N. Hosteny
Joseph N. Hosteny
Attorneys for Plaintiff
TECHNOLOGY LICENSING
CORPORATION
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION TO RESCHEDULE CMC AND
RELATED DATES
Case No. 5:12-cv-06060-EJD
1
2
IT IS ORDERED THAT:
September 20
The Case Management Conference in this matter is rescheduled for _________________,
3
2013. at 10:00 AM. The parties shall file a joint case management conference statement on or
4
before Septemer 13, 2013
5
6
7
DATED:
6/28/2013
HON. EDWARD J. DAVILA
U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
SVI-127265v1
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
STIPULATION TO RESCHEDULE CMC AND
RELATED DATES
Case No. 5:12-cv-06060-EJD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?