Technology Licensing Corporation v. Grass Valley USA, Inc

Filing 34

AMENDED ORDER re 33 Order on Stipulation Continuing Case Management Conference and Related Dates. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 6/28/2013. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/28/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Gregory L. Lippetz (Bar No. 154228) glippetz@jonesday.com Laurie M. Charrington (Bar No. 229679) lmcharrington@jonesday.com Iman Lordgooei (Bar No. 251320) ilordgooei@jonesday.com Heather Fugitt (Bar No. 261588) hfugitt@jonesday.com JONES DAY Silicon Valley Office 1755 Embarcadero Road Palo Alto, CA 94303 Telephone: +1.650.739.3939 Facsimile: +1.650.739.3900 Vicki S. Veenker (Bar No. 158669) vicki@veenkerlaw.com VEENKER LAW OFFICES 2091 Barbara Drive Palo Alto, CA 94303 Telephone: (650) 329-9797 DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP MARTIN L. FINEMAN, Bar No. 104413 505 Montgomery Street, Suite 800 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 276-6575 Facsimile: (415) 276-6599 Email: martinfineman@dwt.com NIRO HALLER & NIRO RAYMOND P. NIRO (Member of the N.D. Cal. Bar) rniro@nshn.com JOSEPH N. HOSTENY (pro hac vice) jhosteny@hosteny.com ARTHUR A. GASEY (pro hac vice) gasey@nshn.com 181 West Madison Street, Suite 4600 Chicago, Illinois 60602 Telephone: (312) 236-0733 Facsimile: (312) 236-3137 Attorneys for Plaintiff TECHNOLOGY LICENSING CORP. Attorneys for Defendant GRASS VALLEY USA, LLC 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 SAN JOSE DIVISION 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 TECHNOLOGY LICENSING CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. GRASS VALLEY USA, LLC, Case No. 5:12-cv-06060-EJD AMENDED JOINT STIPULATION AND XXXXXXXX [PROPOSED] ORDER TO RESCHEDULE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND RELATED DATES Hon. Edward J. Davila Defendant. AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION TO RESCHEDULE CMC AND RELATED DEADLINES Case No. 5:12-cv-06060-EJD 1 Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-1(b) and 6-2(a), and subject to the Court’s approval, Defendant 2 Grass Valley USA, LLC (“Grass Valley”) and Plaintiff Technology Licensing Corporation 3 (“TLC”) hereby jointly request that the Court extend the dates currently set with respect to the 4 Case Management Conference (“CMC”) scheduled in the above-captioned action. 5 On March 5, 2013, Grass Valley filed its Declination to Proceed Before a Magistrate 6 Judge and Request for Reassignment to a United States District Judge. (ECF No. 21.) On the 7 same day, the above-captioned action was reassigned from the Honorable Maria-Elena James, 8 United States Magistrate Judge, to the Honorable Edward J. Davila, United States District Judge, 9 for all further proceedings. (ECF No. 23.) On March 6, 2013, the Court issued a notice resetting 10 the CMC to July 12, 2013, and setting July 5, 2013, as the deadline for the parties to file their 11 Joint Case Management Statement. (ECF No. 24.) 12 On June 18, 2013, TLC informed Grass Valley that it intends to file a motion to amend its 13 complaint to assert two additional patents in this lawsuit. (Lippetz Decl. at ¶ 1.) The parties 14 therefore agree and hereby stipulate that it would be more efficient to postpone the CMC at least 15 70 days, until it is determined which patents and accused products will be litigated in this lawsuit 16 and the parties’ pleadings related to such patents are complete. In particular, having a final 17 resolution on the number and identity of patents in suit, the asserted claims and accused products, 18 will allow the parties to negotiate, and propose for the Court’s adoption, an appropriate schedule 19 and scope of discovery in this action. 20 Accordingly, in order to permit the parties time to finalize the pleadings, the parties 21 hereby stipulate and jointly request that the Court reset and extend the CMC deadlines under the 22 current schedule, as follows: 23  Initial CMC: a date convenient to the Court’s calendar at least 70 days after the 24 currently scheduled Initial CMC date of July 12, 2013, i.e. no earlier than September 25 20, 2013; and 26  Joint Case Management Statement: 7 days prior to the Initial CMC. 27 28 2 STIPULATION TO RESCHEDULE CMC AND RELATED DATES Case No. 5:12-cv-06060-EJD 1 The parties further stipulate to extend the date for commencement of discovery to a date 2 21 days before the extended CMC date, and to extend the date for service of initial disclosures to 3 seven days before the extended CMC date, both subject to the Court’s approval of the extended 4 CMC date. 5 The requested extension will not affect any other Court dates or deadlines in this case. 6 This request for extension is further supported by the Declaration of Gregory L. Lippetz, filed 7 concurrently herewith in accordance with Civil L.R. 6-2(a). 8 9 IT IS SO STIPULATED. Dated: June 26, 2013 Respectfully submitted, 10 JONES DAY 11 By: 12 /s/Gregory L. Lippetz Gregory L. Lippetz Attorneys for Defendant GRASS VALLEY USA, LLC 13 14 ATTESTATION 15 16 I, Gregory L. Lippetz, an ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this 17 Joint Stipulation to Extend Deadlines Related to Case Management Conference, in compliance 18 with Civil L.R. 5-1(i)(3), hereby attest that Joseph N. Hosteny of Niro, Haller & Niro, attorneys 19 for Technology Licensing Corporation, have concurred with this filing. 20 21 22 Dated: June 26, 2013 NIRO, HALLER & NIRO By: 23 24 25 /s/ Joseph N. Hosteny Joseph N. Hosteny Attorneys for Plaintiff TECHNOLOGY LICENSING CORPORATION 26 27 28 3 STIPULATION TO RESCHEDULE CMC AND RELATED DATES Case No. 5:12-cv-06060-EJD 1 2 IT IS ORDERED THAT: September 20 The Case Management Conference in this matter is rescheduled for _________________, 3 2013. at 10:00 AM. The parties shall file a joint case management conference statement on or 4 before Septemer 13, 2013 5 6 7 DATED: 6/28/2013 HON. EDWARD J. DAVILA U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 SVI-127265v1 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 STIPULATION TO RESCHEDULE CMC AND RELATED DATES Case No. 5:12-cv-06060-EJD

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?