Umar v. Storlie

Filing 75

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 74 Requesting Extension of Time To Meet and Confer and Submit Additional Pretrial Conference Documents and/or Letter. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 6/2/2014. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/2/2014)

Download PDF
*E-Filed: June 2, 2014* 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 RICHARD DOYLE, City Attorney (88625) NORA FRIMANN, Assistant City Attorney (93249) CHRISTIAN B. NIELSEN, Chief Deputy City Attorney (87972) SHANNON SMYTH-MENDOZA, Senior Deputy City Attorney (188509) Office of the City Attorney 200 East Santa Clara Street, 16th Floor San José, California 95113-1905 Telephone Number: (408) 535-1900 Facsimile Number: (408) 998-3131 E-Mail Address: cao.main@sanjoseca.gov Attorneys for CRAIG STORLIE 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN JOSE DIVISION 11 AMMIR UMAR, Plaintiff, 12 15 STIPULATION REQUESTING EXTENSION OF TIME TO MEET AND CONFER AND SUBMIT ADDITIONAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE DOCUMENTS AND/OR LETTER; AND [PROPOSED] ORDER v. 13 14 Case Number: CV12-6071 HRL CRAIG STORLIE, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS AN OFFICER OF THE SAN JOSE POLICE DEPARTMENT, and DOES 1-20, inclusive, 16 Trial: Time: Courtroom: Judge: Defendants. 17 November 3, 2014 8:30 a.m. 2 Hon. Howard R. Lloyd 18 19 Plaintiff Ammir Umar and Defendant Craig Storlie in the above-entitled matter hereby 20 stipulate and jointly request that the Court extend the deadline from May 29, 2014 to June 6, 21 2014 to meet and confer and submit a letter of requested materials to the Court pursuant to 22 the Civil Minute Order (Doc. 72). 23 24 In support of this stipulation, the parties hereby submit the following as good cause for granting this request: 25 1. The trial date is November 3, 2014; and 26 2. On May 15, 2014, following the Pretrial Conference, the Court requested that the 27 28 parties meet and confer on the verdict form and submit a joint revised form within two (2) 1 STIPULATION REQUESTING EXTENSION TO COMPLETE MEET AND CONFER AND SUBMIT REQUESTED MATERIALS, AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Case Number: CV12-6071 HRL 1100053_2 1 weeks. Alternatively, if the parties do not reach agreement on the verdict form, the Court 2 requested a letter explaining the area/s of disagreement, along with each party’s proposed 3 verdict form. The parties have been unable to meet and confer fully due to scheduling 4 conflicts. As such, the parties seek a brief extension of time to fully engage in the meet and 5 confer process, and reach agreement, if possible. Accordingly, the parties hereby jointly request that this Court extend the deadline for 6 7 the parties to meet and confer and submit either joint requested materials or letters of to the 8 Court to June 6, 2014. IT IS SO STIPULATED: 9 10 DATED: May 28, 2014 RICHARD DOYLE, City Attorney 11 12 By: __/s/ Shannon Smyth-Mendoza__ SHANNON SMYTH-MENDOZA Senior Deputy City Attorney 13 14 Attorneys for Defendant CRAIG STORLIE individually and as an Officer of the SAN JOSE POLICE DEPARTMENT 15 16 17 I attest that Plaintiff has approved and signed this document, and given consent to the 18 filing of the same with the court. 19 DATED: May 28, 2014 LAW OFFICES OF MORALES & LEAÑOS 20 21 By: _ /s/Jaime A. Leanos________ JAIME A. LEAÑOS 22 Attorneys for Plaintiff AMMIR UMAR 23 24 25 26 27 28 /// /// /// 2 STIPULATION REQUESTING EXTENSION TO COMPLETE MEET AND CONFER AND SUBMIT REQUESTED MATERIALS, AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Case Number: CV12-6071 HRL 1100053_2 1 ORDER 2 Based upon the Stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefor, the 3 Court hereby extends the deadline to meet and confer and submit joint requested materials or 4 letters with requested materials to the Court pursuant to Civil Minute Order dated May 15, 5 2014. 6 7 8 Dated: June 2, 2014 HONORABLE HOWARD R. LLOYD UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 STIPULATION REQUESTING EXTENSION TO COMPLETE MEET AND CONFER AND SUBMIT REQUESTED MATERIALS, AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Case Number: CV12-6071 HRL 1100053_2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?