Umar v. Storlie
Filing
75
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 74 Requesting Extension of Time To Meet and Confer and Submit Additional Pretrial Conference Documents and/or Letter. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 6/2/2014. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/2/2014)
*E-Filed: June 2, 2014*
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
RICHARD DOYLE, City Attorney (88625)
NORA FRIMANN, Assistant City Attorney (93249)
CHRISTIAN B. NIELSEN, Chief Deputy City Attorney (87972)
SHANNON SMYTH-MENDOZA, Senior Deputy City Attorney (188509)
Office of the City Attorney
200 East Santa Clara Street, 16th Floor
San José, California 95113-1905
Telephone Number: (408) 535-1900
Facsimile Number: (408) 998-3131
E-Mail Address: cao.main@sanjoseca.gov
Attorneys for CRAIG STORLIE
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
AMMIR UMAR,
Plaintiff,
12
15
STIPULATION REQUESTING
EXTENSION OF TIME TO MEET AND
CONFER AND SUBMIT ADDITIONAL
PRETRIAL CONFERENCE
DOCUMENTS AND/OR LETTER; AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER
v.
13
14
Case Number: CV12-6071 HRL
CRAIG STORLIE, INDIVIDUALLY AND
AS AN OFFICER OF THE SAN JOSE
POLICE DEPARTMENT, and DOES 1-20,
inclusive,
16
Trial:
Time:
Courtroom:
Judge:
Defendants.
17
November 3, 2014
8:30 a.m.
2
Hon. Howard R. Lloyd
18
19
Plaintiff Ammir Umar and Defendant Craig Storlie in the above-entitled matter hereby
20
stipulate and jointly request that the Court extend the deadline from May 29, 2014 to June 6,
21
2014 to meet and confer and submit a letter of requested materials to the Court pursuant to
22
the Civil Minute Order (Doc. 72).
23
24
In support of this stipulation, the parties hereby submit the following as good cause for
granting this request:
25
1.
The trial date is November 3, 2014; and
26
2.
On May 15, 2014, following the Pretrial Conference, the Court requested that the
27
28
parties meet and confer on the verdict form and submit a joint revised form within two (2)
1
STIPULATION REQUESTING EXTENSION TO
COMPLETE MEET AND CONFER AND SUBMIT REQUESTED
MATERIALS, AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Case Number: CV12-6071 HRL
1100053_2
1
weeks. Alternatively, if the parties do not reach agreement on the verdict form, the Court
2
requested a letter explaining the area/s of disagreement, along with each party’s proposed
3
verdict form. The parties have been unable to meet and confer fully due to scheduling
4
conflicts. As such, the parties seek a brief extension of time to fully engage in the meet and
5
confer process, and reach agreement, if possible.
Accordingly, the parties hereby jointly request that this Court extend the deadline for
6
7
the parties to meet and confer and submit either joint requested materials or letters of to the
8
Court to June 6, 2014.
IT IS SO STIPULATED:
9
10
DATED:
May 28, 2014
RICHARD DOYLE, City Attorney
11
12
By: __/s/ Shannon Smyth-Mendoza__
SHANNON SMYTH-MENDOZA
Senior Deputy City Attorney
13
14
Attorneys for Defendant CRAIG STORLIE
individually and as an Officer of the
SAN JOSE POLICE DEPARTMENT
15
16
17
I attest that Plaintiff has approved and signed this document, and given consent to the
18
filing of the same with the court.
19
DATED:
May 28, 2014
LAW OFFICES OF MORALES & LEAÑOS
20
21
By: _ /s/Jaime A. Leanos________
JAIME A. LEAÑOS
22
Attorneys for Plaintiff
AMMIR UMAR
23
24
25
26
27
28
///
///
///
2
STIPULATION REQUESTING EXTENSION TO
COMPLETE MEET AND CONFER AND SUBMIT REQUESTED
MATERIALS, AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Case Number: CV12-6071 HRL
1100053_2
1
ORDER
2
Based upon the Stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefor, the
3
Court hereby extends the deadline to meet and confer and submit joint requested materials or
4
letters with requested materials to the Court pursuant to Civil Minute Order dated May 15,
5
2014.
6
7
8
Dated: June 2, 2014
HONORABLE HOWARD R. LLOYD
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION REQUESTING EXTENSION TO
COMPLETE MEET AND CONFER AND SUBMIT REQUESTED
MATERIALS, AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Case Number: CV12-6071 HRL
1100053_2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?