Campbell v. Grounds

Filing 153

ORDER GRANTING 152 JOINT ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL A PORTION OF THE COURT'S ORDER ISSUED JANUARY 27, 2017. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 2/2/2017.(blflc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/2/2017)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 SAN JOSE DIVISION 4 5 DESHAWN LEE CAMPBELL, Case No. 12-cv-06089-BLF Plaintiff, 6 v. ORDER GRANTING JOINT ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL A PORTION OF THE COURT'S ORDER ISSUED JANUARY 27, 2017 7 8 RANDY GROUNDS, Defendant. 9 [Re: ECF 152] 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 The Court hereby GRANTS the parties’ joint administrative motion (ECF 152) requesting 12 that the Court seal in part its Order Denying Petitioner’s Motion for Relief from Non-Dispositive 13 Order of Magistrate Judge Cousins Re CDCR’s Motion to Quash Subpoena (ECF 150), which was 14 filed conditionally under seal on January 27, 2017. 15 A party moving to seal judicial records that are filed in connection with a non-dispositive 16 motion must satisfy the “good cause” standard of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c). 17 Kamakana v. City & Cnty. of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1180 (9th Cir. 2006). In this district, a 18 party moving to seal judicial records also must comply with Civil Local Rule 79-5, which requires 19 that a sealing request be “narrowly tailored to seek sealing only of sealable material.” Civil L.R. 20 79-5(b). Here, the parties have shown good cause for sealing portions of the Order and their 21 request is narrowly tailored to leave as much information as possible available to the public. 22 23 24 The Clerk shall file a public, redacted version of the Order which redacts the text identified in the parties’ joint administrative motion. IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 26 27 28 Dated: February 2, 2017 ______________________________________ BETH LABSON FREEMAN United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?