Campbell v. Grounds
Filing
153
ORDER GRANTING 152 JOINT ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL A PORTION OF THE COURT'S ORDER ISSUED JANUARY 27, 2017. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 2/2/2017.(blflc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/2/2017)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
SAN JOSE DIVISION
4
5
DESHAWN LEE CAMPBELL,
Case No. 12-cv-06089-BLF
Plaintiff,
6
v.
ORDER GRANTING JOINT
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE
UNDER SEAL A PORTION OF THE
COURT'S ORDER ISSUED JANUARY
27, 2017
7
8
RANDY GROUNDS,
Defendant.
9
[Re: ECF 152]
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
The Court hereby GRANTS the parties’ joint administrative motion (ECF 152) requesting
12
that the Court seal in part its Order Denying Petitioner’s Motion for Relief from Non-Dispositive
13
Order of Magistrate Judge Cousins Re CDCR’s Motion to Quash Subpoena (ECF 150), which was
14
filed conditionally under seal on January 27, 2017.
15
A party moving to seal judicial records that are filed in connection with a non-dispositive
16
motion must satisfy the “good cause” standard of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c).
17
Kamakana v. City & Cnty. of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1180 (9th Cir. 2006). In this district, a
18
party moving to seal judicial records also must comply with Civil Local Rule 79-5, which requires
19
that a sealing request be “narrowly tailored to seek sealing only of sealable material.” Civil L.R.
20
79-5(b). Here, the parties have shown good cause for sealing portions of the Order and their
21
request is narrowly tailored to leave as much information as possible available to the public.
22
23
24
The Clerk shall file a public, redacted version of the Order which redacts the text identified
in the parties’ joint administrative motion.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
26
27
28
Dated: February 2, 2017
______________________________________
BETH LABSON FREEMAN
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?