Viromed Co., Ltd. v. Liu et al

Filing 17

ORDER GRANTING 14 STIPULATION TO STAY CASE PENDING ARBITRATION. This case is STAYED until the arbitration based on the License Agreement has been completed and a final order issued. Plaintiff's Motion to Stay requesting the same relief is TERMINATED AS MOOT. The clerk of the court shall administratively close this file. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 12/19/2012. (ejdlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/19/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 SAN JOSE DIVISION 5 CASE NO. 5:12-cv-06093 EJD VIROMED CO., LTD., 6 ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO STAY CASE PENDING ARBITRATION Plaintiff(s), 7 8 v. CHENG LIU, et. al., [Docket Item No(s). 14] 9 Defendant(s). 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 / The parties’ stipulation to stay this case pending arbitration (see Docket Item No. 14) is GRANTED as follows: 1. This case is STAYED until the arbitration based on the License Agreement has been 14 completed and a final order issued. Plaintiff’s Motion to Stay requesting the same 15 relief (Docket Item No. 8) is TERMINATED AS MOOT. 16 2. the clerk of the court shall administratively close this file. 17 18 Due to what may be a period of extended inactivity while the arbitration progresses, 3. The parties shall provide notice to the court within one week of the issuance of a final 19 order from arbitration. In the notice, the parties shall request that this matter be 20 reopened and that a case management conference be scheduled. 21 22 23 4. This Order shall not prevent either party from seeking to reopen this case and lift or extend the stay should the circumstances warrant. IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 25 Dated: December 19, 2012 EDWARD J. DAVILA United States District Judge 26 27 28 1 CASE NO. 5:12-cv-06093 EJD ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO STAY CASE PENDING ARBITRATION

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?