American Semiconductor, Inc v. California Assignments, LLC et al

Filing 39

Order by Hon. Lucy H. Koh granting 38 Stipulation and requesting clarification.(lhklc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/26/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
12

AMERICAN SEMICONDUCTOR, INC., an
Idaho corporation,

13
14

Plaintiff,
vs.

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

CALIFORNIA ASSIGNMENTS LLC, a
California limited liability company;
DEVELOPMENT SPECIALISTS, INC., an
Illinois corporation; and DOES 1 through 10,
inclusive,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No.: 12-CV-06138-LHK

ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR
PLAINTIFF TO REPLY TO
DEFENDANT’S OPPOSITION TO
MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY
JUDGMENT AND REQUESTING
CLARIFICATION

On March 22, 2013, the parties filed a stipulation jointly moving the Court for an extension
of time for Plaintiff to file its reply to Defendants’ Opposition for Partial Summary Judgment, from
March 22, 2013 to March 29, 2013. ECF No. 38.
The Court notes that this is the fourth stipulation to extend time that the parties have filed
on the day of the scheduled deadline. See ECF No. 23; ECF No. 28; ECF No. 32; ECF No. 38.
Although the Court hereby extends time for Plaintiff to reply to Defendant’s Opposition to Motion
for Summary Judgment, further requests for extension of time for the pending motions will be
disfavored. Any future requests in this case shall be filed at least 3 business days prior to the

28
Case No.: 12-CV-06138-LHK
ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO REPLY TO DEFENDANTS’ OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR
PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND REQUESTING CLARIFICATION

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11
12

deadline that the parties wish to reschedule, and shall comply with Northern District of California
Civil Local Rule 6.
The Court further notes that Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction was filed on
December 31, 2012, and is scheduled for hearing on April 18, 2013. ECF No. 5. Pursuant to Civil
Local Rule 7-3, any opposition or Statement of Nonopposition was due on January 14, 2013. N.D.
Cal. Civil L. Rule 7-3. The Court requests that Defendants state their position on the Preliminary
Injunction by March 28, 2013. This is not an invitation for Defendants to file an untimely
opposition.
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 26, 2013

_________________________________
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No.: 12-CV-06138-LHK
ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO REPLY TO DEFENDANTS’ OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR
PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND REQUESTING CLARIFICATION