Integrated Storage Consulting Services, Inc. v. NetApp, Inc.

Filing 12

STIPULATION AND ORDER GRANTING SECOND REQUEST EXTENDING TIME TO FILE RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT re 7 Stipulation filed by NetApp, Inc. NetApp shall file its response to the Complaint on or before January 30, 2013. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 1/23/2013. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/23/2013)

Download PDF
S RT vila A H ER rd J . D a FO NO d wa J u d ge E R NIA DERED O OR IT IS S LI UNIT ED RT U O 1 ROBERT R. MOORE (BAR NO. 113818) MICHAEL J. BETZ (BAR NO. 196228) 2 CATHY A. HONGOLA (BAR NO. 234489) ALLEN MATKINS LECK GAMBLE MALLORY & NATSIS LLP 3 Three Embarcadero Center, 12th Floor 4 San Francisco, CA 94111-4074 Phone: (415) 837-1515 5 Fax: (415) 837-1516 E-Mail: rmoore@allenmatkins.com mbetz@allenmatkins.com 6 chongola@allenmatkins.com 7 Attorneys for Defendant 8 NETAPP, INC. S DISTRICT TE C TA N F D IS T IC T O R C 1/23/2013 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 SAN JOSE DIVISION 12 INTEGRATED STORAGE CONSULTING SERVICES, INC., a Colorado corporation, 13 Plaintiff, 14 v. 15 NETAPP, INC., a Delaware corporation, and 16 DOES 1-10, inclusive, Case No. C12-6209 EJD (PSG) SECOND STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO FILE RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT Defendants. 17 18 19 Plaintiff Integrated Storage Consulting Services, Inc. ("ISCSI") and Defendant NetApp, 20 Inc. ("NetApp"), hereby agree and stipulate as follows: 21 WHEREAS, on December 7, 2012, ISCSI filed a Complaint for Breach of Contract, 22 Breach of the Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing, Statutory Unfair Competition under 23 California Law, and California Common Law, and Equitable Claims against NetApp; 24 WHEREAS, the last day for NetApp to respond to ISCSI's Complaint was January 2, 25 2013; 26 WHEREAS, on December 26, 2012, the parties agreed that NetApp should have an 27 extension to January 23, 2013 to respond to ISCSI's Complaint; and 28 LAW OFFICES Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP 872477.01/SF -1- Case No. C12-6209 PSG Second Stipulation Extending Time to File Response to Complaint 1 WHEREAS, the parties now agree that NetApp shall have a further extension to January 2 30, 2013 to respond to ISCSI's Complaint. 3 NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties stipulate that NetApp shall file its response to the 4 Complaint on or before January 30, 2013. 5 SO STIPULATED. 6 Dated: January 18, 2013 7 8 ALLEN MATKINS LECK GAMBLE MALLORY & NATSIS LLP By: 9 10 11 Dated: January 18, 2013 /s/ Cathy A. Hongola CATHY A. HONGOLA Attorneys for Defendant NETAPP, INC. DONANHUE GALLAGHER WOODS LLP 12 By: 13 14 15 /s/ Andrew S. MacKay ANDREW S. MACKAY Attorneys for Plaintiff INTEGRATED STORAGE CONSULTING SERVICES, INC. 16 17 Attestation Regarding Signature: This document is being filed electronically under my 18 User ID and Password. Pursuant to General Order 45, Section X.B, I hereby attest that 19 concurrence in this filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatory to this 20 document. /s/ Cathy A. Hongola Cathy A. Hongola 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 LAW OFFICES Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP 872477.01/SF -2- Case No. C12-6209 PSG Second Stipulation Extending Time to File Response to Complaint

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?