Integrated Storage Consulting Services, Inc. v. NetApp, Inc.
Filing
12
STIPULATION AND ORDER GRANTING SECOND REQUEST EXTENDING TIME TO FILE RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT re 7 Stipulation filed by NetApp, Inc. NetApp shall file its response to the Complaint on or before January 30, 2013. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 1/23/2013. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/23/2013)
S
RT
vila
A
H
ER
rd J . D a
FO
NO
d wa
J u d ge E
R NIA
DERED
O OR
IT IS S
LI
UNIT
ED
RT
U
O
1 ROBERT R. MOORE (BAR NO. 113818)
MICHAEL J. BETZ (BAR NO. 196228)
2 CATHY A. HONGOLA (BAR NO. 234489)
ALLEN MATKINS LECK GAMBLE
MALLORY & NATSIS LLP
3
Three Embarcadero Center, 12th Floor
4 San Francisco, CA 94111-4074
Phone: (415) 837-1515
5 Fax: (415) 837-1516
E-Mail: rmoore@allenmatkins.com
mbetz@allenmatkins.com
6
chongola@allenmatkins.com
7
Attorneys for Defendant
8 NETAPP, INC.
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
1/23/2013
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
SAN JOSE DIVISION
12 INTEGRATED STORAGE CONSULTING
SERVICES, INC., a Colorado corporation,
13
Plaintiff,
14
v.
15
NETAPP, INC., a Delaware corporation, and
16 DOES 1-10, inclusive,
Case No. C12-6209 EJD (PSG)
SECOND STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO
FILE RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT
Defendants.
17
18
19
Plaintiff Integrated Storage Consulting Services, Inc. ("ISCSI") and Defendant NetApp,
20 Inc. ("NetApp"), hereby agree and stipulate as follows:
21
WHEREAS, on December 7, 2012, ISCSI filed a Complaint for Breach of Contract,
22 Breach of the Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing, Statutory Unfair Competition under
23 California Law, and California Common Law, and Equitable Claims against NetApp;
24
WHEREAS, the last day for NetApp to respond to ISCSI's Complaint was January 2,
25 2013;
26
WHEREAS, on December 26, 2012, the parties agreed that NetApp should have an
27 extension to January 23, 2013 to respond to ISCSI's Complaint; and
28
LAW OFFICES
Allen Matkins Leck Gamble
Mallory & Natsis LLP
872477.01/SF
-1-
Case No. C12-6209 PSG
Second Stipulation Extending Time to File
Response to Complaint
1
WHEREAS, the parties now agree that NetApp shall have a further extension to January
2 30, 2013 to respond to ISCSI's Complaint.
3
NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties stipulate that NetApp shall file its response to the
4 Complaint on or before January 30, 2013.
5
SO STIPULATED.
6 Dated: January 18, 2013
7
8
ALLEN MATKINS LECK GAMBLE
MALLORY & NATSIS LLP
By:
9
10
11 Dated: January 18, 2013
/s/ Cathy A. Hongola
CATHY A. HONGOLA
Attorneys for Defendant
NETAPP, INC.
DONANHUE GALLAGHER WOODS LLP
12
By:
13
14
15
/s/ Andrew S. MacKay
ANDREW S. MACKAY
Attorneys for Plaintiff
INTEGRATED STORAGE CONSULTING
SERVICES, INC.
16
17
Attestation Regarding Signature: This document is being filed electronically under my
18 User ID and Password. Pursuant to General Order 45, Section X.B, I hereby attest that
19 concurrence in this filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatory to this
20 document.
/s/ Cathy A. Hongola
Cathy A. Hongola
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
LAW OFFICES
Allen Matkins Leck Gamble
Mallory & Natsis LLP
872477.01/SF
-2-
Case No. C12-6209 PSG
Second Stipulation Extending Time to File
Response to Complaint
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?