Mendoza v. County of Santa Clara et al

Filing 11

ORDER REFERRING CASE TO ENE AND MEDIATION. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on February 20, 2013. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/20/2013)

Download PDF
*E-FILED: 2/20/13* UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MARIA MENDOZA CASE NO. 5-12-cv-06225-HRL Plaintiff(s), v. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA ETAL. Defendant(s). STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS ----------------------~/ Counsel repmt that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5: The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: Court Processes: Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4) Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) D IZJ IZJ (Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form ofADR must participate in an ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice ofNeedfor ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5) ,l!l;ivate Process: Private ADR (please identifY process and provider) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ U The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: the presumptive deadline (Fhe deadline is 90 days from the date of the order referring the case to an ADR process unless othenvise ordered.) D IZJ other requested deadline _J'-'u-:no:::e_,2"'8'-'2::.:0:..:1..::3_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _--t---- ' {~~tJ;:."' - - Attorney for Plaintiff Dated: 2/15113 Is/ Valerie Ly Attorney for Defendant CONTINUE TO FOLLOWING PAGE [PROPOSED] ORDER X D D Dated: The parties' stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED. The parties' stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED. February 20, 2013 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATEJUDGE When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate Docket Event, e.g., "Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Mediation." Rev. 12111 Page 2 of2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?