Sapan v. Maximum Security Alarm, Inc et al

Filing 35

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. If Plaintiff does not, by 12:00 p.m. on 3/4/2014, file a Joint Preliminary Pretrial Conference Statement and explains why the parties did not attend a settlement conference, or otherwise demonstrate good cause in writing why this case should not be dismissed, the court will dismiss the action with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). No hearing will be held on the order to show cause unless otherwise ordered by the court. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 2/28/2014. (ejdlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/28/2014)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9

SAN JOSE DIVISION
CASE NO. 5:12-cv-06257 EJD

PAUL SAPAN,

11

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
Plaintiff(s),

For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13

v.
MAXIMUM SECURITY ALARM, INC., et.
al.,

14
15

Defendant(s).
/

16
17

On July 15, 2013, this court issued a Case Management Order which scheduled a Preliminary

18

Pretrial Conference for this action on March 7, 2014, and required the parties to file a Joint

19

Preliminary Pretrial Conference Statement on or before February 25, 2014. See Docket Item No. 33.

20

In addition, on July 17, 2013, the court issued an order referring this action to a settlement

21

conference with Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd to be completed within 90 days of the date of

22

the order. See Docket Item No. 34.

23

As of the date and time this order was filed, the parties have not demonstrated compliance

24

with either order, and it appears to the court that Plaintiff has abandoned this action. Accordingly,

25

the court hereby issues an order to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for failure to

26

prosecute or for failure to comply with a court order. If Plaintiff does not, by 12:00 p.m. on March

27

4, 2014, file a Joint Preliminary Pretrial Conference Statement which conforms to the undersigned’s

28

Standing Order and explains why the parties did not attend a settlement conference, or otherwise
1
CASE NO. 5:12-cv-06257 EJD
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

1

demonstrate good cause in writing why this case should not be dismissed, the court will dismiss the

2

action with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). No hearing will be held on

3

the order to show cause unless otherwise ordered by the court.

4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

5
6

Dated: February 28, 2014
EDWARD J. DAVILA
United States District Judge

7
8
9

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
CASE NO. 5:12-cv-06257 EJD
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE