Lifescan, Inc. et al v. Shasta Technologies, LLC et al
Filing
64
Order by Hon. Lucy H. Koh denying 55 Motion to Expedite.(lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/29/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
SAN JOSE DIVISION
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
LIFESCAN, INC. and
JOHNSON & JOHNSON,
12
13
14
15
16
Plaintiffs,
vs.
SHASTA TECHNOLOGIES, LLC,
PHARMATECH SOLUTIONS, INC.,
DECISION DIAGNOSTICS CORP. and
CONDUCTIVE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 12-CV-06360
ORDER DENYING ADMINISTRATIVE
MOTION TO ADVANCE THE
HEARING DATE FOR LIFESCAN AND
JOHNSON & JOHNSON’S MOTION
FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
17
Plaintiffs Lifescan, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson (“Plaintiffs”) have filed an administrative
18
motion to advance the hearing date on Plaintiffs’ motion for preliminary injunction (ECF No. 14),
19
which is currently scheduled to be heard May 2, 2013. ECF No. 55. Due to the Court’s impacted
20
schedule, the Court cannot accommodate Plaintiffs’ request. Accordingly, Plaintiffs’
21
administrative motion is DENIED. The hearing on Plaintiffs’ motion for preliminary injunction
22
will remain as set on May 2, 2013 at 1:30 p.m. However, if an earlier hearing date becomes
23
available, the Court will advance Plaintiffs’ motion hearing.
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
Dated: January 29, 2013
26
_________________________________
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge
27
28
1
Case No.: 12-CV-06360
ORDER DENYING ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO ADVANCE THE HEARING DATE FOR LIFESCAN AND
JOHNSON & JOHNSON’S MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?