Lifescan, Inc. et al v. Shasta Technologies, LLC et al

Filing 64

Order by Hon. Lucy H. Koh denying 55 Motion to Expedite.(lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/29/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SAN JOSE DIVISION United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 LIFESCAN, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON, 12 13 14 15 16 Plaintiffs, vs. SHASTA TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, PHARMATECH SOLUTIONS, INC., DECISION DIAGNOSTICS CORP. and CONDUCTIVE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 12-CV-06360 ORDER DENYING ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO ADVANCE THE HEARING DATE FOR LIFESCAN AND JOHNSON & JOHNSON’S MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION 17 Plaintiffs Lifescan, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson (“Plaintiffs”) have filed an administrative 18 motion to advance the hearing date on Plaintiffs’ motion for preliminary injunction (ECF No. 14), 19 which is currently scheduled to be heard May 2, 2013. ECF No. 55. Due to the Court’s impacted 20 schedule, the Court cannot accommodate Plaintiffs’ request. Accordingly, Plaintiffs’ 21 administrative motion is DENIED. The hearing on Plaintiffs’ motion for preliminary injunction 22 will remain as set on May 2, 2013 at 1:30 p.m. However, if an earlier hearing date becomes 23 available, the Court will advance Plaintiffs’ motion hearing. 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 Dated: January 29, 2013 26 _________________________________ LUCY H. KOH United States District Judge 27 28 1 Case No.: 12-CV-06360 ORDER DENYING ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO ADVANCE THE HEARING DATE FOR LIFESCAN AND JOHNSON & JOHNSON’S MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?