Park et al v. Welch Foods Inc.

Filing 78

ORDER DENYING MOTIONS FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION, SUMMARY JUDGMENT by Judge Paul S. Grewal denying 57 ; denying 63 . (psglc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/4/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 ELIZABETH PARK, et al., Plaintiffs, 8 v. 9 10 WELCH FOODS INC., ORDER DENYING MOTIONS FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION, SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Re: Docket Nos. 57, 63) Defendant. 11 United States District Court Northern District of California Case No. 5:12-cv-06449-PSG 12 The court previously stayed this case1 pending the resolution of the Ninth Circuit appeals 13 14 in Brazil v. Dole Food Company, Inc., et al.,2 Jones v. ConAgra Foods, Inc.3 and Kosta v. Del 15 Monte Foods, Inc.4 Plaintiffs’ motion for class certification and to appoint class representatives 16 and class counsel5 and Defendant Welch Foods Inc.’s motion for partial summary judgment6 are 17 DENIED without prejudice to renewal upon the reopening of this case. Within seven days of the 18 resolution of the Ninth Circuit’s pending matters, the parties shall schedule a status conference by 19 contacting the undersigned’s courtroom deputy. 20 21 See Docket No. 77. 2 Case No. 14-17480 (9th Cir. filed Dec. 17, 2014). 3 Case No. 14-16327 (9th Cir. filed July 15, 2014). 4 Case No. 15-16974 (9th Cir. filed Oct. 2, 2015). 5 22 1 See Docket No. 57. 6 See Docket No. 63. 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 Case No. 5:12-cv-06449-PSG ORDER DENYING MOTIONS FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION, SUMMARY JUDGMENT 1 SO ORDERED. 2 Dated: April 4, 2016 3 4 _________________________________ PAUL S. GREWAL United States Magistrate Judge 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Case No. 5:12-cv-06449-PSG ORDER DENYING MOTIONS FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION, SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?