Barajas v. Guaraldi et al

Filing 36

ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. The hearing on the Order to Show Cause is CONTINUED to 12/13/2013 at 10:00 a.m. The Order to Show Cause shall be automatically vacated if a stipulated dismissal is filed on or before 12:00 p.m. on 12/12/2013. The parties are notified that this is the final continuance of the show cause hearing without an appearance. All counsel shall be present at the hearing on 12/13/2013 unless the stipulated dismissal is filed by the deadline provided by this order. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 12/6/2013. (ejdlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/6/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SAN JOSE DIVISION CASE NO. 5:12-cv-06457 EJD ADAN BARAJAS, 11 ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Plaintiff(s), For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 v. RONALD GUARALDI, et. al., 14 Defendant(s). 15 / 16 Having reviewed the Notice of Settlement filed December 6, 2013 (see Docket Item No. 35), 17 and good cause appearing therefor, the hearing on the Order to Show Cause scheduled for December 18 6, 2013, is CONTINUED to December 13, 2013, at 10:00 a.m. The Order to Show Cause shall be 19 automatically vacated if a stipulated dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a) is 20 filed on or before 12:00 p.m. on December 12, 2013. 21 The parties are notified that this is the final continuance of the show cause hearing without 22 an appearance. All counsel shall be present at the hearing on December 13, 2013, unless the 23 stipulated dismissal is filed by the deadline provided by this order. 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 26 Dated: December 6, 2013 EDWARD J. DAVILA United States District Judge 27 28 1 CASE NO. 5:12-cv-06457 EJD ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?