Lomeli v. Citibank,N.A et al
Filing
14
STIPULATION AND ORDER 13 to Compel Arbitration and to Stay Action. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 4/17/13. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/17/2013)
1
4
LAW OFFICES OF MICHAEL D. SCHULMAN
MICHAEL D. SCHULMAN, ESQ. SBN 137249
21800 Oxnard Street, Suite 750
Woodland Hills, CA 91367
Telephone: (818) 999-5553
Fax : (818) 999-5570
5
Attorneys for Citibank, N.A.
2
3
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION
8
9
10
Adolfo Martinez Lomeli,
11
Plaintiffs,
12
vs.
13
Citibank N.A., Client Services, Inc.,
14
CASE NO.: CV12-6570HRL
STIPULATION AND []
ORDER TO COMPEL
ARBITRATION AND TO STAY
ACTION
Defendants.
15
16
17
TO THE COURT, ALL PARTIES IN INTEREST AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF
RECORD:
18
WHEREAS, plaintiff, Adolfo Martinez Lomeli (“Plaintiff”), on the one hand, and
19
defendants, Citibank N.A. (“Citibank”) and Client Services, Inc. (“CSI”), on the other
20
hand, have agreed to stipulate to an order compelling the instant dispute to binding
21
arbitration before JAMS, San Jose division, as a consumer arbitration.
22
Plaintiff agrees to pay only $250.00 to JAMS and no more. Defendant Citibank,
23
N.A., (“Citibank”) shall pay JAMS any other fees (including arbitrator compensation) and
24
costs required.
25
26
THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BY AND BETWEEN PLAINTIFF,
CITIBANK and CSI, THROUGH THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD, THAT:
27
1. The instant dispute is compelled to binding arbitration before JAMS as a
28
consumer arbitration pursuant to the terms of the revised Citibank Arbitration
1
__________________
STIPULATION AND [] ORDER TO COMPEL BINDING ARBITRATION AND TO STAY ACTION
1
Agreement contained in the revised Card Agreement (a copy of which is attached
2
hereto as Exhibit “A”).
3
2. Plaintiff agrees to pay only $250.00 to JAMS and no more. Defendant
4
Citibank, N.A., (“Citibank”) shall pay JAMS any other fees (including arbitrator
5
compensation) and costs required.
6
3. The JAMS arbitrator’s award is final and binding on the parties unless a party
7
appeals it in writing to JAMS as specified in the JAMS Optional Arbitration Appeal
8
Procedure June 2003 rules (Exhibit “B” hereto”). A final and binding award is subject to
9
judicial review and enforcement as provided by the FAA or other applicable law.
4.
10
11
The instant action is stayed pending notification of the outcome of the
arbitration proceedings.
12
5. The Northern District of California, San Jose Division, shall retain jurisdiction
13
for the purpose of enforcing this Stipulation and entering judgment upon the award of
14
the arbitrator.
IT IS SO STIPULATED:
15
16
Dated: March 26, 2013
By: /s/Balám Letona
Balam O. Letona
Attorneys for Adolfo Martinez Lomeli
17
18
19
LAW OFFICES OF BALAM O. LETONA
Dated: March 26, 2013
20
LAW OFFICES OF MICHAEL D. SCHULMAN
By: /s/ Michael Schulman
Michael D. Schulman
Attorneys for Citibank, N.A.
21
22
23
Dated: March 26, 2013
By: /s/ David Kaminski
David Kaminski
Attorneys for Client Services, Inc.
24
25
26
27
28
CARLSON & MESSER LLP.
//
//
//
2
__________________
STIPULATION AND [] ORDER TO COMPEL BINDING ARBITRATION AND TO STAY ACTION
1
2
3
4
5
ORDER
GOOD CAUSE HAVING BEEN SHOWN, the Court adopts the stipulation of the
parties and hereby stays this action pending arbitration.
SO ORDERED.
6
7
8
Dated: _______________
____________________________________
JUDGE OF THE DISTRICT COURT
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
__________________
STIPULATION AND] ORDER TO COMPEL BINDING ARBITRATION AND TO STAY ACTION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?