In Re FACEBOOK INTERNET TRACKING LITIGATION

Filing 154

Transcript of Proceedings held on 07/28/2017, before Judge Davila. Court Reporter Irene L. Rodriguez, email address Irene_Rodriguez@cand.uscourts.gov. Per General Order No. 59 and Judicial Conference policy, this transcript may be viewed only at the Clerk's Office public terminal or may be purchased through the Court Reporter until the deadline for the Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Any Notice of Intent to Request Redaction, if required, is due no later than 5 business days from date of this filing. (Re #153 Transcript Order ) Release of Transcript Restriction set for 10/30/2017. (Related documents(s) #153 ) (Rodriguez, Irene) (Filed on 8/1/2017)

Download PDF
1 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 2 3 4 5 IN RE: FACEBOOK INTERNET TRACKING LITIGATION. 6 11 TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE HONORABLE EDWARD J. DAVILA UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 12 13 14 A-P-P-E-A-R-A-N-C-E-S FOR THE PLAINTIFFS: KAPLAN, FOX & KILSHEIMER LLP BY: DAVID A. STRAITE 850 THIRD AVENUE NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10022 FOR THE DEFENDANTS: COOLEY LLP BY: MATTHEW D. BROWN 101 CALIFORNIA STREET, 5TH FLOOR SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94111 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 SAN JOSE, CALIFORNIA PAGES 1 - 28 8 10 12-MD-02314-EJD JULY 28, 2017 7 9 CASE NO. OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER: IRENE L. RODRIGUEZ, CSR, RMR, CRR CERTIFICATE NUMBER 8074 PROCEEDINGS RECORDED BY MECHANICAL STENOGRAPHY, TRANSCRIPT PRODUCED WITH COMPUTER. 23 24 25 UNITED STATES COURT REPORTERS 2 1 SAN JOSE, CALIFORNIA 2 JULY 28, 2017 P R O C E E D I N G S 09:59AM 3 (COURT CONVENED AT 9:59 A.M.) 09:59AM 4 THE COURT: 09:59AM 5 IF I COULD HAVE THE APPEARANCES. 09:59AM 6 MR. STRAITE: 09:59AM 7 09:59AM 8 THE COURT: THANK YOU. 09:59AM 9 MR. BROWN: AND MATTHEW BROWN FOR FACEBOOK. 09:59AM 10 THE COURT: GOOD MORNING. 09:59AM 11 WE'RE ON FOR A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. 09:59AM 12 FORWARD. 09:59AM 13 THANK YOU FOR YOUR COURTESY. 10:00AM 14 10:00AM 15 TO DO IS TO GIVE YOU SOME DATES TODAY FOR FILING AND HEARING 10:00AM 16 AND THOSE TYPES OF THINGS. 10:00AM 17 10:00AM 18 THERE'S AN ISSUE ABOUT DISCOVERY AND WHETHER OR NOT FACEBOOK 10:00AM 19 SHOULD PROVIDE ADDITIONAL REQUESTED ADDITIONAL DISCOVERY AS TO 10:00AM 20 NOW SOME DISCRETE ISSUE IT SOUNDS LIKE. 10:00AM 21 10:00AM 22 10:00AM 23 MR. STRAITE: 10:00AM 24 THE COURT: 10:00AM 25 THIS BE FOR FACEBOOK TO PRODUCE? LET'S CALL OUR MORNING CASE 12-MD-2314. THIS IS DAVID STRAITE FROM KAPLAN, FOX & KILSHEIMER NEW YORK FOR THE PLAINTIFFS. THANK YOU. GOOD MORNING. NICE TO SEE YOU BOTH. YOU CAN COME I DID RECEIVE -- OH, YOU CAN BE SEATED. I DID RECEIVE YOUR STATEMENT. SURE, YOU CAN BOTH COME UP. THANK YOU. SO WHAT I INTEND I ALSO WANTED TO TALK A LITTLE BIT ABOUT -- IT SEEMS LIKE CAN YOU JUST TELL ME, WHAT IS IT THAT YOU THINK YOU NEED THAT YOU DON'T ALREADY HAVE. THANK YOU, YOUR HONOR. AND HOW VOLUMINOUS AND BURDENSOME WILL UNITED STATES COURT REPORTERS 3 10:00AM 1 MR. STRAITE: 10:00AM 2 FIRST CATEGORY OF DOCUMENTS THAT WE WOULD LIKE WOULD BE COPIES 10:00AM 3 OF THE HELP CENTER PAGES THAT WE'VE ALLEGED INFORM THE MEANING 10:00AM 4 OF THE PRIVACY POLICY AND THE SRR, THAT'S THE STATEMENT OF 10:01AM 5 RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES. 10:01AM 6 CONDITIONS. 10:01AM 7 10:01AM 8 10:01AM 9 10:01AM 10 EVERY SINGLE HELP CENTER PAGE THAT'S RELEVANT FOR OUR CLAIM DID 10:01AM 11 APPEAR DURING THE CLASS PERIOD. 10:01AM 12 10:01AM 13 THAT WE HAVE BEEN WORKING VERY HARD WITH OUR OUTSIDE 10:01AM 14 INVESTIGATORS AND INSIDE INVESTIGATORS. 10:01AM 15 THIS IS SOMETHING THAT WE'VE LEARNED IN THE LAST FEW DAYS SO 10:01AM 16 IT'S NOT IN THE CMC STATEMENT. 10:01AM 17 MORNING THAT WE MAY HAVE AN ALTERNATIVE SOLUTION THAT YOUR 10:01AM 18 HONOR MAY LIKE, AND I JUST RAN IT THROUGH HIM BECAUSE IT WAS A 10:01AM 19 BRAINSTORM. 10:01AM 20 10:01AM 21 OF THE RELEVANT LANGUAGE OF THE HISTORICAL HELP CENTER PAGES 10:01AM 22 THAT WE THINK ARE PART OF THE CONTRACT OR AT LEAST HELP DEFINE 10:01AM 23 THE CONTRACT. 10:01AM 24 THE COURT: 10:01AM 25 MR. STRAITE: THE COURT: OKAY. THANK YOU, YOUR HONOR. THE GENERALLY THAT'S THE TERMS AND SO CAN YOU TELL ME THOSE WOULD BE SOMETHING ADDITIONAL THAN WHAT APPEARS ON A PUBLIC WEB PAGE? MR. STRAITE: NO, YOUR HONOR. TO OUR KNOWLEDGE AND ONE THING THAT WE'VE BEEN DOING FOR THE PAST MONTH IS WE MAY HAVE -- AND I JUST TOLD MR. BROWN THIS THIS WE HAVE BEEN ABLE TO UNCOVER, WE BELIEVE, IT WOULD BE ALL OH. THEY'RE FROM OLD NOTES AND OUTSIDE UNITED STATES COURT REPORTERS 4 10:01AM 1 SOURCES AND THEY'RE FROM WAFE ACT MACHINE AND FOR ALL SORTS OF 10:01AM 2 DIFFERENT SOURCES IDENTIFIED HERE IN COURT, BUT WE THINK WE 10:02AM 3 HAVE ALL OF THE RELEVANT LANGUAGE THAT WE CAN ALLEGE IN GOOD 10:02AM 4 FAITH IN THE COMPLAINT. 10:02AM 5 THE COURT: 10:02AM 6 MR. STRAITE: 10:02AM 7 ABOUT THAT. ONE IS THAT WE CAN'T CONFIRM THAT WE HAVE 10:02AM 8 EVERYTHING. WE'RE STILL LOOKING, AND WE'VE BEEN WORKING VERY 10:02AM 9 HARD OVER THE PAST MONTH. 10:02AM 10 ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS THAT WE'RE NOT AWARE OF, AND WE DON'T KNOW 10:02AM 11 IF WE HAVE A COMPLETE SET. 10:02AM 12 SO WE BELIEVE IT'S HELPFUL TO HAVE ALL OF THE RELEVANT 10:02AM 13 HISTORICAL HELP CENTER PAGES FROM THE CLASS PERIOD PRODUCED 10:02AM 14 PRIOR TO THE DRAFTING OF THE THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT, BUT AS AN 10:02AM 15 ALTERNATIVE, YOUR HONOR, IN THE INTEREST OF EFFICIENCY AND 10:02AM 16 GETTING THIS DONE, WE WOULD BE WILLING TO HAVE A STIPULATION 10:02AM 17 HERE THAT WE BE LIMITED TO WHAT OUR INVESTIGATORS FOUND PUT 10:02AM 18 THAT IN THE COMPLAINT SO LONG AS IN OPPOSITION FACEBOOK THEN 10:02AM 19 DOES NOT PROVIDE ADDITIONAL HELP CENTER PAGES OR LANGUAGE THAT 10:02AM 20 WEREN'T PRODUCED TO US BECAUSE THAT WOULD BE UNFAIR. 10:02AM 21 10:02AM 22 10:02AM 23 10:02AM 24 IT SEEMS UNUSUAL TO SAY THE LEAST AND MAYBE BORDERING ON ABSURD 10:03AM 25 THAT WE HAVE A CASE THAT'S NOW BOILED DOWN TO TWO CLAIMS, TWO THE COURT: I SEE. THAT MAY BE THE CASE. TWO THINGS AND, NUMBER TWO, THERE MAY BE DO YOU WANT TO PLAY WITH THE CARDS THAT ARE ON THE TABLE? MR. BROWN: WELL, LET ME FIRST START BY SAYING THAT UNITED STATES COURT REPORTERS 5 10:03AM 1 CONTRACT RELATED CLAIMS, A BREACH OF CONTRACT CLAIM AND A 10:03AM 2 BREACH OF THE IMPLIED COVENANT OF GOOD FAITH AND FAIR DEALING, 10:03AM 3 AND AT THIS JUNCTURE OF THE CASE WHAT THE PLAINTIFFS ARE 10:03AM 4 ESSENTIALLY SAYING IS THAT WE'RE NOT REALLY SURE WHAT THE 10:03AM 5 CONTRACT IS. 10:03AM 6 FACEBOOK. 10:03AM 7 WE'RE NOT REALLY SURE WHAT IT IS, AND WE NEED DISCOVERY AND ALL 10:03AM 8 OF THE HELP CENTER PAGES ON THE SITE THAT EXISTED BACK IN 2011 10:03AM 9 SO THAT WE CAN THEN LOOK AT ALL OF THEM AND SEE IF WE CAN 10:03AM 10 SCROUNGE UP SOME PROVISION THAT WE ARE THEN GOING TO ALLEGE 10:03AM 11 THAT WAS PART OF THE CONTRACT. 10:03AM 12 THE COURT: HELP US FILE OUR LAWSUIT. 10:03AM 13 MR. BROWN: YES. 10:03AM 14 WAY THAT THIS OUGHT TO PROCEED. 10:03AM 15 A CONTRACT, THEY OUGHT TO BE ABLE TO ALLEGE WHAT THE CONTRACT 10:03AM 16 IS. 10:03AM 17 10:03AM 18 CONTRACT CASE, THEY CAN COME TO THE COURT AND SAY HERE'S THE 10:03AM 19 CONTRACT, ALL OF IT, AND HERE ARE THE THREE PROVISIONS IN THE 10:03AM 20 CONTRACT THAT WE BELIEVE THE OTHER SIDE BREACHED. 10:04AM 21 PRETTY BASIC. 10:04AM 22 10:04AM 23 SUCCESSFULLY AMEND THE COMPLAINT TO SUCCESSFULLY ALLEGE EITHER 10:04AM 24 OF THESE TWO CLAIMS AND IN PART FOR THAT REASON, BUT THE IDEA 10:04AM 25 THAT WE SHOULD HAVE TO DO SOME ADDITIONAL DISCOVERY IN ORDER WE'RE ALLEGING THAT WE HAD A CONTRACT WITH YOU, WE'RE ALLEGING THAT YOU BREACHED THE CONTRACT, BUT AND THAT DOESN'T SEEM TO BE THE IF THEY BELIEVE THAT THEY HAVE TYPICALLY WHEN YOU HAVE A PLAINTIFF FILING A BREACH OF THAT'S SO I DON'T THINK THAT THEY'RE GOING TO BE ABLE TO UNITED STATES COURT REPORTERS 6 10:04AM 1 TO -- SO THAT THEY CAN SCROUNGE UP SOME ADDITIONAL LANGUAGE IN 10:04AM 2 A HELP CENTER DOESN'T SEEM APPROPRIATE TO ME. 10:04AM 3 10:04AM 4 IS THAT WE'RE WILLING TO FOREGO THAT IF EVERYBODY AGREES THAT 10:04AM 5 OUR LAWSUIT CAN BE PLED AND GO FORWARD AND INCLUDING MOTIONS TO 10:04AM 6 DISMISS, ET CETERA, WITH WHAT YOU HAVE NOW. 10:04AM 7 10:04AM 8 SPRING THIS ON MR. BROWN THIS MORNING. 10:04AM 9 THINK ABOUT IT. 10:04AM 10 THE COURT: 10:04AM 11 AN ANSWER HERE PRETTY QUICKLY. 10:04AM 12 10:04AM 13 10:04AM 14 10:05AM 15 LANGUAGE, THE IMPORTANT POINT TO REMEMBER IS THAT OUR SECOND 10:05AM 16 AMENDED COMPLAINT DID, IN FACT, QUOTE LANGUAGE FROM ONE OF THE 10:05AM 17 HELP CENTER PAGES. 10:05AM 18 10:05AM 19 LINKED TO THE PRIVACY POLICY IN THE CONTRACT DRAMATICALLY, 10:05AM 20 THEMATICALLY AND THROUGH HYPERLINKS, NOT DIRECTLY BUT THROUGH 10:05AM 21 THE HELP CENTER GENERALLY. 10:05AM 22 IN OUR CONTRACT REPEATEDLY. 10:05AM 23 AND THEN IN RESPONSE FACEBOOK ARGUED THAT BECAUSE WE 10:05AM 24 DIDN'T ATTACH AN ACTUAL PRINTOUT OF THE HELP CENTER PAGE THAT 10:05AM 25 WE WERE NOT ABLE TO PLEAD OUR CLAIM. THE COURT: WELL, I THOUGHT -- WHAT I HEARD YOU SAY MR. STRAITE: YES. AND IN ALL FAIRNESS, I DID HE HASN'T HAD TIME TO OH, HE'S PRETTY SMART. MR. STRAITE: HE CAN RACHET UP AND FOR THE RECORD, I'LL CONFIRM HE'S SMARTER THAN ME SO EVEN BETTER. TO ADDRESS MR. BROWN'S FIRST POINT ABOUT SCROUNGING UP NEW WE ALLEGE IT WAS A PART OF THE CONTRACT AND ALLEGED IT WAS SO THE LANGUAGE WAS QUOTED VERBATIM SO IT'S NOT NEW LANGUAGE UNITED STATES COURT REPORTERS 7 10:05AM 1 THAT WE WOULD BE ADDING. IT'S THE DOCUMENTATION, MAYBE THE 10:05AM 2 SCREEN SHOT OR OTHER DOCUMENTATION THAT WOULD PROVE THE 10:05AM 3 LANGUAGE IS CORRECT. 10:05AM 4 SINCE THEN WE HAVE SCROUNGED UP ADDITIONAL LANGUAGE THAT 10:05AM 5 WE WILL BE ADDING TO THE THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT AND A LOT OF 10:05AM 6 LANGUAGE, IN FACT, FROM VARIOUS OTHER HELP CENTER PAGES. 10:05AM 7 AGAIN, WE DO NOT BELIEVE THAT MR. BROWN IS CORRECT THAT WE HAVE 10:05AM 8 TO SHOW THE SCREEN SHOTS OF WHAT THOSE PAGES LOOK LIKE SIX 10:05AM 9 YEARS AGO. 10:06AM 10 10:06AM 11 10:06AM 12 FACEBOOK PRODUCES THEIR INTERNAL DOCUMENTS AS TO WHAT THE HELP 10:06AM 13 CENTER PAGES ACTUALLY LOOKED LIKE DURING THE CLASS PERIOD OR 10:06AM 14 YOU ACCEPT OUR ALLEGATIONS AS TRUE FOR PURPOSES OF THE 10:06AM 15 COMPLAINT, WHICH ORDINARILY HAPPENS AND TO PROCEED, AND THEY 10:06AM 16 DON'T PUT IN ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE IN OPPOSITION TO OUR COMPLAINT 10:06AM 17 THAT WAS WITHHELD FROM US FOR THE LAST THREE YEARS. 10:06AM 18 10:06AM 19 10:06AM 20 10:06AM 21 10:06AM 22 10:06AM 23 CONTRACT AND THEY COME FORWARD AND SAY HERE'S WHAT WE'RE 10:06AM 24 ALLEGING THE CONTRACT IS, YOU ALWAYS, AS THE DEFENDANT, HAVE 10:06AM 25 THE ABILITY ON A MOTION TO DISMISS TO SAY TO THE COURT, WAIT A WE, I DON'T HAVE A TIME MACHINE, BUT I DO HAVE THE ACTUAL LANGUAGE. SO WE WOULD BE HAPPY WITH EITHER LANGUAGE. THE COURT: EITHER SO THAT SOUNDS IMMINENTLY REASONABLE, DOESN'T IT? MR. BROWN: IT'S NOT REASONABLE, AND I CAN'T AGREE TO THAT. SO IN ANY CASE WHERE THE PLAINTIFF IS ALLEGING A BREACH OF UNITED STATES COURT REPORTERS 8 10:06AM 1 MINUTE, IF THEY'RE CONTENDING THIS IS WHAT THE CONTRACT IS, 10:06AM 2 THEY'RE ACTUALLY NOT SHOWING YOU ALL OF IT. 10:06AM 3 AND I THINK IT'S COMPLETELY CONSISTENT, AND I'M NOT GOING 10:06AM 4 TO CONCEDE RIGHT NOW THAT THE HELP CENTER PAGES WERE, IN FACT, 10:06AM 5 PART OF THE CONTRACT, BUT IF THE PLAINTIFFS ARE GOING TO COME 10:07AM 6 IN A COMPLAINT AND ALLEGE THAT THEY ARE BUT SELECTIVELY SHOW 10:07AM 7 HELP CENTER PAGES WHEN THERE MAY BE OTHER HELP CENTER PAGES 10:07AM 8 THAT BEAR ON THE INTERPRETATION OF THOSE OR CONTRADICTED OR 10:07AM 9 SUPPLEMENTED IN SOME MEANINGFUL WAY, WE WOULD RESERVE THE RIGHT 10:07AM 10 TO COME TO THE COURT AND SEEK JUDICIAL NOTICE OR INCORPORATION 10:07AM 11 BY REFERENCE UNDER THAT DOCTRINE WHICH IS APPROVED BY THE NINTH 10:07AM 12 CIRCUIT. 10:07AM 13 SO I CAN'T BE IN THE POSITION OF SAYING THAT WE WILL 10:07AM 14 HIGHER ON THE HAND ON A MOTION TO DISMISS, AND WE CAN ONLY HAVE 10:07AM 15 A DEBATE ABOUT THE HELP CENTER PAGES THAT THEY CHOOSE TO PUT 10:07AM 16 FORWARD. 10:07AM 17 10:07AM 18 IT REALLY BE THAT DIFFICULT TO OBTAIN THOSE HISTORIC PAGES 10:07AM 19 DURING THE CLASS PERIOD IF THAT'S REALLY THE FOCUS OF THEIR 10:07AM 20 DISCOVERY, IF YOU WILL, REQUEST? 10:07AM 21 MR. BROWN: 10:07AM 22 IMAGINE. 10:08AM 23 OF WEB PAGES, AND IT'S NOT AS THOUGH YOU CAN, WHEN YOU'RE GOING 10:08AM 24 BACK AND PULLING THINGS FROM THE 2010 OR 2011 PERIOD, IT'S NOT 10:08AM 25 AS THOUGH WE CAN JUST GO AND THOSE ARE SITTING IN A LITTLE THE COURT: SURE, I CAN APPRECIATE THAT. BUT WOULD IT MAY VERY WELL BE HARDER THAN YOU I MEAN, THE HELP CENTER IS A PRETTY BIG AND VAST SET UNITED STATES COURT REPORTERS 9 10:08AM 1 VAULT SOMEWHERE AND WE CAN JUST, YOU KNOW, TAKE A QUICK COPY OF 10:08AM 2 THEM. 10:08AM 3 AND PULL HISTORICAL VERSIONS OF WEB PAGES THAT ARE PROBABLY NO 10:08AM 4 LONGER THERE THIS MANY YEARS LATER. 10:08AM 5 10:08AM 6 SHOULD BE RELITIGATING A MOTION TO COMPEL WHICH WAS TERMINATED 10:08AM 7 AND SUPPOSED TO BE RE-FILED, BUT WHAT WE OFFERED DURING THE 10:08AM 8 MEET AND CONFER PERIOD WAY BACK WHEN IS TO SAY IF YOU CAN POINT 10:08AM 9 TO PARTICULAR HELP CENTER PAGES THAT YOU CONTEND ARE RELEVANT 10:08AM 10 AND WE'LL RESERVE OUR RIGHTS TO SAY THAT THEY ARE NOT RELEVANT, 10:08AM 11 BUT IF YOU CAN POINT TO CERTAIN ONES THEN, SURE, WE'LL GO GET 10:08AM 12 THEM FOR YOU. 10:08AM 13 10:09AM 14 JUST PRODUCE EVERY SINGLE PAGE IN THE HELP CENTER, AND IT'S A 10:09AM 15 HELP CENTER. 10:09AM 16 HAS NO BEARING WHATSOEVER ON THEIR CLAIM WHICH IS THAT WE 10:09AM 17 IMPROPERLY COLLECTED INTERNET BROWSING HISTORY OF THESE NAMED 10:09AM 18 PLAINTIFFS. 10:09AM 19 SO I DO HAVE A PROBLEM WITH GOING AND JUST SORT OF 10:09AM 20 GENERALLY COLLECTING HELP CENTER PAGES WHEN WE KNOW VERY WELL 10:09AM 21 THAT THE VAST MAJORITY OF THEM DON'T HAVE ANY BEARING AT ALL ON 10:09AM 22 THEIR ALLEGATIONS. 10:09AM 23 THE COURT: 10:09AM 24 BE MUCH MORE DISCRETE, THOUGH? 10:09AM 25 IT'S A LITTLE BIT MORE COMPLICATED THAN THAT TO GO BACK AND SO WHAT WE HAVE ALWAYS OFFERED, AND I DON'T THINK WE BUT INSTEAD, THEY STUCK TO THE POSITION THAT WE SHOULD THEY'RE ALL MANNER OF INFORMATION IN THERE THAT WELL, IT SOUNDS LIKE YOUR SEARCH WOULD MR. STRAITE: I BELIEVE THAT'S THE CASE, YOUR HONOR. UNITED STATES COURT REPORTERS 10 10:09AM 1 AND, IN FACT, IF IT WOULD BE HELPFUL TO REDUCE THE BURDEN ON 10:09AM 2 DEFENDANT, WE COULD IDENTIFY THE LANGUAGE THAT WE'LL BE PUTTING 10:09AM 3 INTO THE THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT, INCLUDING THE OLD DEAD URL'S 10:09AM 4 THAT WERE USED BACK IN 2011. 10:09AM 5 TEN HELP CENTER PAGES. 10:09AM 6 10:09AM 7 JUST A WHILE AGO. 10:09AM 8 SEVERAL YEARS AGO IN 2011 JUDGE KOH DECIDED A VERY SIMILAR 10:09AM 9 QUESTION IN THE CASE OF FRALEY VERSUS FACEBOOK. 10:10AM 10 IS 830 F. SUPP. 2D 785. 10:10AM 11 QUOTED -- I'M SORRY, A FACEBOOK HELP CENTER PAGE. 10:10AM 12 FACEBOOK PUT ADDITIONAL HELP CENTER PAGES ATTACHED TO A REQUEST 10:10AM 13 FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION TO DISMISS. 10:10AM 14 ADDITIONAL HELP CENTER PAGES SUDDENLY BECAME RELEVANT IN 10:10AM 15 OPPOSITION TO THE COMPLAINT AND IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION TO 10:10AM 16 DISMISS. 10:10AM 17 10:10AM 18 STANDARDS FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE. 10:10AM 19 TO HAVE TO HAVE ALL OF THIS ARGUMENT. 10:10AM 20 THAT MANY OF THE HELP CENTER PAGES SHE WOULD NOT JUDICIALLY 10:10AM 21 NOTICE. 10:10AM 22 ON THE QUESTION OF JUDICIAL NOTICE. 10:10AM 23 EFFICIENT SIMPLY TO RESOLVE IT HERE WE WOULD ARGUE. 10:10AM 24 10:10AM 25 WE SUSPECT IT WILL BE FEWER THAN SPEAKING TO THE EFFICIENCY, WE TALKED ABOUT THE UNFAIRNESS WE'RE NOT DISCUSSING THIS IN A VACUUM. THIS IS FROM 2011. THE CITATION THE PLAINTIFFS IN RESPONSE AND JUDGE KOH HAD TO GO THROUGH A LENGTHY OPINION ABOUT IT WAS INCREDIBLY INEFFICIENT SHE EVENTUALLY RULED SOME CAME IN AND SOME DID NOT. THE COURT: THANK YOU. THERE WAS A BRIEFING IT WOULD BE FAR MORE IF YOU CAN IDENTIFY, MR. BROWN, A CERTAIN PAGES' LANGUAGE AND PAGES, IT SEEMS TO ME UNITED STATES COURT REPORTERS 11 10:10AM 1 THAT THAT WOULD ASSIST YOUR CLIENT AT LEAST IN LOCATING THESE. 10:11AM 2 10:11AM 3 APPARENT, IS THAT I'M TRYING TO FASHION BEARING F.R.C.P. 1 IN 10:11AM 4 MIND ABOUT THE EFFICIENT MANAGEMENT AND PROGRESS OF THE CASE 10:11AM 5 AND A CASE THAT IS FOUR OR FIVE YEARS OLD AND MAYBE THE WORD 10:11AM 6 "EFFICIENT" SHOULDN'T BE IN THE SAME SENTENCE, BUT I THINK 10:11AM 7 WE'RE AT A PLACE NOW WHERE THERE IS -- THIS CASE HAS BEEN 10:11AM 8 REFINED. 10:11AM 9 AS YOU POINT OUT, MR. BROWN, IT'S JUST A VERY, VERY FINITE, 10:11AM 10 DISCRETE QUESTION THAT'S HERE. 10:11AM 11 QUESTION OF SORTS. 10:11AM 12 10:11AM 13 TO BE SUCH THAT YOU CAN GET RESOLUTION ONE WAY OR THE OTHER AND 10:11AM 14 GET SOME ADDITIONAL FOCUS. 10:11AM 15 10:11AM 16 SCHEDULE FOR FILING, AS I TOLD YOU, AND I'D LIKE TO SEE IF YOU 10:11AM 17 CAN ACCOMPLISH THIS DISCOVERY ISSUE. 10:12AM 18 I SIT AND, PARDON ME, I'M NOT ENGULFED IN THE LITIGATION LIKE 10:12AM 19 YOU ARE, BUT IT SEEMS LIKE IF YOU WERE TO IDENTIFY THESE 10:12AM 20 DISCRETE PAGES LANGUAGE THAT THE DIFFICULTY THAT FACEBOOK WOULD 10:12AM 21 HAVE IN LOCATING THAT DISCRETE INFORMATION WOULD PROBABLY BE 10:12AM 22 LESS TIME THAN IT WOULD TAKE TO FILE MOTIONS IN FRONT OF GOOD 10:12AM 23 JUDGE COUSINS AND ARGUE THOSE MOTIONS AND BE FAR MORE COST 10:12AM 24 EFFECTIVE IF WE CAN JUST NARROW THAT DOWN HERE. 10:12AM 25 WHAT I'M LOOKING AT. WHAT I'M TRYING TO DO HERE, AND I THINK -- I HOPE IT'S IT'S GONE THROUGH MOTION PRACTICE. SO NOW THERE'S -- IT'S A BREACH OF CONTRACT I'D LIKE TO ASSIST YOU IN GETTING YOU WHERE YOU BOTH NEED IT SEEMS TO ME THAT WHAT I WANT TO DO IS TO GIVE YOU A IT SOUNDS LIKE FROM WHERE UNITED STATES COURT REPORTERS THAT'S KIND OF 12 10:12AM 1 WHILE YOU GET YOUR PENCILS OUT, I'LL TELL YOU THE DATES 10:12AM 2 THAT I AM THINKING ABOUT SUCH THAT IT WILL GUIDE YOUR THOUGHTS 10:12AM 3 ABOUT THIS DISCOVERY ISSUE. 10:12AM 4 10:12AM 5 FILED ON NO LATER THAN FRIDAY, AUGUST 25TH; ANY MOTION TO 10:12AM 6 DISMISS WOULD THEN BE FILED ON FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 8TH; 10:13AM 7 OPPOSITION TO THAT WOULD BE FILED FRIDAY, OCTOBER 13TH; A REPLY 10:13AM 8 WOULD BE FILED FRIDAY, OCTOBER 27TH, AND I'LL RESERVE A MOTION 10:13AM 9 DATE, A HEARING DATE, EXCUSE ME, FOR THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 16TH, 10:13AM 10 10:13AM 11 10:13AM 12 NOW, AND I'M HOPEFUL THAT THIS ISSUE REGARDING PAGES THAT YOU 10:13AM 13 NEED AND YOUR REQUEST FROM FACEBOOK CAN BE RESOLVED SUCH THAT 10:13AM 14 YOU CAN MEET THIS DEADLINE. 10:13AM 15 10:13AM 16 REASONABLE PERSON, AND HE'S A SKILLED LAWYER, AND HE'LL DO HIS 10:13AM 17 BEST, OF COURSE, TO PROTECT HIS CLIENT, BUT I BELIEVE WE CAN 10:13AM 18 GET THIS DONE IN GOOD FAITH. 10:13AM 19 MR. BROWN: 10:14AM 20 HAVE MY CALENDAR IN FRONT OF ME. 10:14AM 21 COMPLAINT WOULD BE FILED AUGUST 25TH AND THEN THE MOTION WOULD 10:14AM 22 BE DUE IS THAT -- 10:14AM 23 10:14AM 24 10:14AM 25 WHAT I'D LIKE TO DO IS TO HAVE THE THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 16TH AT 9:00 A.M. THAT'S THE SCHEDULE THAT I'D LIKE TO IMPOSE ON THE CASE MR. STRAITE: I'M CONFIDENT WE CAN. MATT IS A VERY SO IF I'M LOOKING AT THE DATES, I DON'T SO YOU'RE SAYING THAT THE THE COURT: THE COMPLAINT FILED AUGUST 25TH, THAT'S MR. BROWN: AND THEN WE WOULD HAVE ABOUT, WHAT, RIGHT. UNITED STATES COURT REPORTERS 13 10:14AM 1 14 DAYS TO MOVE TO DISMISS? 10:14AM 2 THE COURT: RIGHT. 10:14AM 3 MR. BROWN: OKAY. 10:14AM 4 THING THAT I WOULD WANT TO BRING UP WITH THE COURT IF THAT'S 10:14AM 5 WHERE THE COURT WAS LEANING AT, YOU KNOW, ON THE DISCOVERY OF 10:14AM 6 THE HELP CENTER PAGES. 10:14AM 7 SERIOUS CONCERN TO FACEBOOK IS A BROADER DISCOVERY INITIATIVE. 10:14AM 8 I KNOW THAT WE HAVE THESE EXISTING ISSUES THAT WERE TEED UP IN 10:14AM 9 THE MOTION TO COMPEL AND YOU RULED THAT THOSE NEED TO BE 10:14AM 10 REFILED WITH JUDGE COUSINS, BUT DURING OUR MEET AND CONFER LAST 10:14AM 11 WEEK AND IN PREPARATION FOR THE CMC I HEARD SUGGESTIONS THAT 10:14AM 12 THERE COULD BE, YOU KNOW, ADDITIONAL DISCOVERY NOW WAGED 10:14AM 13 INCLUDING NOTICING DEPOSITIONS OF FACEBOOK EMPLOYEES AND THE 10:15AM 14 LIKE, AND THAT JUST DOESN'T SEEM RIGHT IN THE POSTURE WE ARE 10:15AM 15 IN. 10:15AM 16 10:15AM 17 THOUGHT INITIALLY WAS WE DON'T NEED ANY DEPOSITIONS. 10:15AM 18 THINK YOU NEED ANY DEPOSITION TO PROCEED ON THIS SCHEDULE AND 10:15AM 19 MAYBE YOU SHOULD TELL ME IF I'M WRONG. 10:15AM 20 10:15AM 21 WE'RE NOT PREPARED TO TAKE DEPOSITIONS FOR A NUMBER OF REASONS 10:15AM 22 FOR THE NEXT COUPLE OF MONTHS. 10:15AM 23 THE MOST IMPORTANT REASON, WHICH WE'LL ADDRESS WITH 10:15AM 24 JUDGE COUSINS, IS THAT 99.9 PERCENT OF THE DOCUMENT PRODUCTION 10:15AM 25 IS DESIGNATED ATTORNEYS EYES ONLY. THE COURT: I GUESS THE -- YOU KNOW, THE ONE YOU KNOW, ONE THING THAT IS OF VERY AND LET ME -- I THOUGHT ABOUT THAT. MR. STRAITE: MY I DON'T NO, YOUR HONOR, YOU'RE EXACTLY RIGHT. AND UNDER THE COURT'S UNITED STATES COURT REPORTERS 14 10:15AM 1 CONFIDENTIALITY ORDER I'M NOT ALLOWED TO SHOW THOSE DOCUMENTS 10:15AM 2 TO ANY DEPONENT UNLESS THE DEPONENT WROTE THE DOCUMENT OR 10:15AM 3 OTHERWISE HAS KNOWLEDGE OF IT. 10:15AM 4 DEPOSITIONS PERIOD AS A PRACTICAL MATTER. 10:15AM 5 JUDGE COUSINS RESOLVES THAT -- WE CAN'T DO DEPOSITIONS. 10:15AM 6 10:15AM 7 DISCOVERY FROM THREE INDIVIDUALS AND WE'RE PROPOSING MORE 10:15AM 8 DOCUMENTS FROM ANOTHER 20 INDIVIDUALS WHICH WERE SUGGESTED BY 10:15AM 9 THE CURRENT DOCUMENT PRODUCTION, WE BELIEVE IT WOULD BE UNWISE 10:16AM 10 TO START DEPOSITIONS UNTIL WE GET ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS ANYWAY. 10:16AM 11 I WOULD BE SHOCKED IF WE WERE IN A POSITION TO TAKE THE FIRST 10:16AM 12 DEPOSITION BEFORE ORAL ARGUMENT ON AUGUST 16TH. 10:16AM 13 YOUR CONCERNS AND THE PRACTICAL POSTURE OF THE CASE COINCIDE. 10:16AM 14 10:16AM 15 10:16AM 16 10:16AM 17 10:16AM 18 BUT I GUESS BEYOND THAT, AND I UNDERSTAND THAT YOUR HONOR 10:16AM 19 HAS A GENERAL PHILOSOPHY, I THINK, THAT DISCOVERY SHOULDN'T BE 10:16AM 20 STAYED FOR LONG PERIODS OF TIME. 10:16AM 21 10:16AM 22 HAD TWO COMPLAINTS DISMISSED, AND WE HAVE 9 OF THE 11 CLAIMS 10:16AM 23 DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, AND WE'RE DOWN TO TWO CLAIMS, AND I'M 10:16AM 24 NOT SURE THAT THEY'LL BE ABLE TO REPLEAD THEM SUCCESSFULLY. 10:16AM 25 THAT MEANS THAT I CAN'T TAKE SO UNTIL AND, SECOND OF ALL, BECAUSE WE ONLY HAVE DOCUMENT THE COURT: SO I THINK I DIDN'T ANTICIPATE THERE WOULD BE ANY DEPOSITION PRACTICE AT ALL. MR. BROWN: I DIDN'T EITHER UNTIL THE MEET AND CONFER LAST WEEK. BUT, YOU KNOW, GIVEN THE POSTURE THAT WE'RE IN HERE, WE'VE I WOULD LIKE TO BE ABLE TO AT LEAST HIT THE PAUSE BUTTON UNITED STATES COURT REPORTERS 15 10:16AM 1 ON BRIEFING ON THE MOTION TO COMPEL AND DOCUMENT DISCOVERY AS 10:16AM 2 WELL, AND WE'RE ONLY TALKING ABOUT NOVEMBER 16TH FOR THE 10:16AM 3 HEARING, AND YOU'RE OBVIOUSLY SETTING THIS FOR A MORE EXPEDITED 10:17AM 4 SCHEDULE THAN IS OFTEN THE CASE. 10:17AM 5 SO I ASK THAT WITH HUMILITY BECAUSE I UNDERSTAND YOUR 10:17AM 6 GENERAL PHILOSOPHY, BUT IT JUST SEEMS TO BE APPROPRIATE IN THE 10:17AM 7 PARTICULAR PROCEDURAL POSTURE THAT WE'RE IN NOW. 10:17AM 8 10:17AM 9 10:17AM 10 IF IT WOULD HELP, YOUR HONOR, WE CAN AGREE NO REQUEST FOR 10:17AM 11 ADMISSIONS, NO INTERROGATORIES, NO SCHEDULED DEPOSITIONS, NO 10:17AM 12 NOTICES FOR DEPOSITION UNTIL AFTER NOVEMBER 16TH. 10:17AM 13 FOCUS ON DOCUMENTS BETWEEN NOW AND THEN, THAT'S A COMPROMISE 10:17AM 14 THAT WE'RE WILLING TO OFFER. 10:17AM 15 MR. BROWN: WELL -- 10:17AM 16 THE COURT: THAT SOUNDS PRETTY GENEROUS. 10:17AM 17 MR. BROWN: WELL, IF, IF THEY CAN'T, IF THEY 10:17AM 18 10:17AM 19 THE COURT: YOU'RE OVERWHELMED BY THE GENEROSITY. 10:17AM 20 MR. BROWN: REALLY, I'M ALMOST LEFT SPEECHLESS 10:17AM 21 BECAUSE OF THE 20 EXTRA CUSTODIANS THAT THEY WANT US TO COLLECT 10:17AM 22 DOCUMENTS FROM. 10:17AM 23 10:17AM 24 ATTORNEY'S FEES THAT COULD BE IN UPWARDS OF SIX FIGURES, IF 10:17AM 25 THEY REALLY FOLLOW THROUGH ON THEIR REQUEST FOR US TO COLLECT MR. STRAITE: YOUR HONOR, OF COURSE GIVEN THE PROCEDURAL POSTURE IT'S IMPORTANT FOR US TO BE REASONABLE AND IF WE JUST CAN'T -- I MEAN, THAT'S THE REALITY HERE. WE'RE TALKING ABOUT UNITED STATES COURT REPORTERS 16 10:18AM 1 DOCUMENTS, AND MAYBE I'M GETTING THE NUMBER 20 WRONG, I CAN'T 10:18AM 2 REMEMBER WHAT IT IS ANYMORE, BUT IT'S A SIGNIFICANT NUMBER OF 10:18AM 3 ADDITIONAL CUSTODIANS, AND WHEN YOU'RE IN A SITUATION LIKE THIS 10:18AM 4 WHEN IT'S VERY, VERY POSSIBLE THAT THE CASE MAY NOT BE GOING 10:18AM 5 FORWARD BEYOND THE END OF THIS YEAR, IT JUST SEEMS TO ME THAT 10:18AM 6 IT MAKES SENSE AT THIS JUNCTURE TO HIT THE PAUSE BUTTON. 10:18AM 7 10:18AM 8 TWO CLAIMS SUCCESSFULLY AND IT GETS BEYOND OUR MOTION TO 10:18AM 9 DISMISS, THEN THAT'S A DIFFERENT STORY AT THAT POINT. 10:18AM 10 10:18AM 11 AGAIN FOR A THIRD TIME FOR A MOTION TO STAY PENDING A RULING ON 10:18AM 12 A MOTION TO DISMISS OR I RECALL OBVIOUSLY JUST BEING DENIED I 10:18AM 13 WOULD SIMPLY SAY EVERYTHING WE SAID THERE WE SAY AGAIN, AND 10:18AM 14 GIVEN OUR NEW OFFER TO HAVE LIMITED DISCOVERY JUST OF 10:18AM 15 DOCUMENTS, AND WE CAN EVEN HAVE DISCUSSIONS WITH JUDGE COUSINS 10:18AM 16 ABOUT NARROWING THE SCOPE OF CUSTODIANS EVEN FURTHER THAN THE 10:18AM 17 20 OR SO THAT WE IDENTIFIED AS RELEVANT, THAT'S SOMETHING THAT 10:18AM 18 JUDGE COUSINS WILL DECIDE IF IT'S APPROPRIATE. 10:18AM 19 COURSE, WOULD OPPOSE THIS FOURTH REQUESTED STAY OF DISCOVERY 10:19AM 20 PENDING THE RULING ON THE MOTION TO DISMISS. 10:19AM 21 10:19AM 22 10:19AM 23 MR. STRAITE: 10:19AM 24 THE COURT: 10:19AM 25 IF IT TURNS OUT THAT THEY'RE ABLE TO PLEAD ONE OF THESE MR. STRAITE: THE COURT: IT SOUNDS LIKE COUNSEL IS ARGUING BUT WE, OF WELL, I APPRECIATE MR. BROWN EXPRESSING THE CONCERNS THAT HIS CLIENT AND THE COSTS -YES. -- THAT HIS CLIENTS ARE FACING. AND IN HIS LENS THIS CASE IS COMING TO AT LEAST A CLOSURE AT SOME UNITED STATES COURT REPORTERS 17 10:19AM 1 POINT IN TIME. THAT'S HIS VIEW OF IT. 10:19AM 2 10:19AM 3 10:19AM 4 THE COURT: 10:19AM 5 MR. STRAITE: 10:19AM 6 WE HAVE ADDITIONAL HELP CENTER PAGES THAT WE'LL BE DISCUSSING. 10:19AM 7 THE REAL SALIENT FACT NOW IS THE DATE THAT THIS CASE WAS FILED, 10:19AM 8 THE CLASS PERIOD THAT WE HAVE ALLEGED. 10:19AM 9 FIVE, SIX, SOMETIMES SEVEN YEARS BEFORE FOR THESE DOCUMENTS. 10:19AM 10 FURTHER DELAY IS INCREDIBLY PREJUDICIAL. 10:19AM 11 HAPPENS TO DOCUMENTS AND IF THEY GO STALE, AND WE DON'T KNOW IF 10:19AM 12 STANDARDS CHANGE. 10:19AM 13 10:19AM 14 DISKS, AND WE HAVE TO CONVERT ON FLOPPY DISKS. 10:19AM 15 DELAY ACTUALLY INCREASES THE COST OF DISCOVERY, THE HARDER IT 10:20AM 16 BECOMES TO FIND THE DOCUMENTS AND PRODUCE THEM AND IN 10:20AM 17 APPROPRIATE FORMAT, WE BELIEVE THAT THE AGE OF THE CASE 10:20AM 18 ACTUALLY MITIGATES IN FAVOR OF MORE OF A RAPID PRODUCTION AND 10:20AM 19 NOT A LESS RAPID PRODUCTION. 10:20AM 20 10:20AM 21 THE PLAINTIFFS HAVE A DIFFERENT VIEW OF THE CASE THAN THE 10:20AM 22 DEFENDANTS, OF COURSE, AND THEY FEEL IT'S A ROBUST CASE AND 10:20AM 23 NOTWITHSTANDING THE SIZE OF THE CASE NOW AND HOW IT APPEARS 10:20AM 24 TRIMMED DOWN. 10:20AM 25 MR. STRAITE: AND I WOULD SAY EXACTLY THE OPPOSITE THAT NOT ONLY -I UNDERSTAND. -- BECAUSE NOW WE HAVE FOCUS BECAUSE WE'RE GOING BACK NOW WE DON'T KNOW WHAT AND REMEMBER IN THE OLD DAYS WE HAD DOCUMENTS ON FLOPPY THE COURT: OKAY. THANK YOU. THE FURTHER WHICH IS TO SAY THAT I JUST DON'T THINK THAT IT'S APPROPRIATE TO HIT THE PAUSE UNITED STATES COURT REPORTERS 18 10:20AM 1 BUTTON, PARDON ME, MR. BROWN. I'D LIKE YOU -- I HEAR THE 10:20AM 2 SPIRIT OF COOPERATION HERE THAT THE PLAINTIFFS HAVE SAID, YES, 10:20AM 3 OUR CASE IS REDUCED. 10:20AM 4 AND ACCORDINGLY OUR REQUEST FOR THE HELP CENTER LANGUAGE THAT 10:20AM 5 MIGHT HELP IN SOME WAY THE PLAINTIFFS IDENTIFY A BREACH IS 10:20AM 6 IMPORTANT TO THEIR CASE AND WITH THE LIMITATIONS EXPRESSED HERE 10:20AM 7 RECOGNIZING THAT I DON'T WANT THIS TO INVOLVE INTERROGATORIES, 10:21AM 8 DEPOSITIONS, AND PRODUCTIONS. 10:21AM 9 10:21AM 10 THAT THEY MIGHT ASSIST WHAT YOU ALREADY HAVE, AND IT SOUNDS 10:21AM 11 LIKE YOU HAVE, WHAT I'VE HEARD YOU SAY, WE PROBABLY HAVE ENOUGH 10:21AM 12 TODAY TO GO FORWARD WITH THE COMPLAINT. 10:21AM 13 MR. STRAITE: 10:21AM 14 THE COURT: 10:21AM 15 10:21AM 16 SO I'M NOT GOING TO HIT THE PAUSE BUTTON RIGHT NOW. 10:21AM 17 THINK WE'RE PERILOUSLY CLOSE TO GETTING SOME TYPE OF FINALITY 10:21AM 18 ON THE CASE ONE WAY OR ANOTHER, THAT IS, DEPENDING ON HOW THE 10:21AM 19 MOTIONS GO AND IT WILL EITHER THRIVE OR IT WON'T, I SUPPOSE, 10:21AM 20 AND WE'RE CLOSE TO THAT DATE. 10:21AM 21 10:21AM 22 TALK ABOUT ADR, AND THIS IS ON ECF PAGE 3 AT LINE 1. 10:22AM 23 THAT BE ENGAGED AT ALL NOW? 10:22AM 24 COMMENTS ON THAT? 10:22AM 25 WE HAVE THIS DISCRETE ISSUE ABOUT BREACH IF YOU CAN JUST GET AND IDENTIFY THOSE PAGES RECOGNIZING CLIENT'S SAKE. YES, YOUR HONOR. YES. BUT YOU WANT TO CONFIRM IT FOR YOUR I APPRECIATE THAT. SO I'D LIKE TO KEEP THESE DATES THEN. MR. STRAITE: I LET ME ASK YOU, YOU SHOULD WHAT IS YOUR STATUS ON THAT, YOUR THANK YOU, YOUR HONOR. UNITED STATES COURT REPORTERS WE HAVE NEVER 19 10:22AM 1 HAD A MEDIATION. WE'VE NEVER HAD ANY ASSISTED DISCUSSIONS, NO 10:22AM 2 NEUTRALS, NO NOTHING. 10:22AM 3 10:22AM 4 COMPLAINT, ONE OF TWO THINGS WILL HAPPEN. 10:22AM 5 SUCCEED ON ONE OR TWO OF THE CLAIMS AND WE'LL GO TO TRIAL, OR 10:22AM 6 WE WON'T SUCCEED AND WE GO TO THE NINTH CIRCUIT. 10:22AM 7 10:22AM 8 TIME TO HAVE A FORMAL MEDIATION, AND WE WOULD BE WILLING TO 10:22AM 9 SPLIT THE COST 50/50. 10:22AM 10 A COMPLETE WASTE OF TIME, WE WILL ACCEPT THAT JUDGMENT, BUT WE 10:22AM 11 PUT FORWARD HERE FORMALLY WE THINK IT'S A GOOD IDEA. 10:22AM 12 THE COURT: MR. BROWN. 10:22AM 13 MR. BROWN: RIGHT. 10:22AM 14 MANAGEMENT STATEMENT, BUT TO GIVE A LITTLE MORE COLOR TO IT, 10:22AM 15 WE'RE AT A POINT WHERE WE REALLY DON'T THINK THAT THEY'RE GOING 10:22AM 16 TO BE ABLE TO REPLEAD. 10:23AM 17 WE'VE NEVER THOUGHT THAT THE COMPLAINTS THAT THEY PUT 10:23AM 18 FORWARD HAD SUFFICIENT FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS TO SUPPORT THE LEGAL 10:23AM 19 THEORIES THAT THEY WERE FORWARDING, AND IT'S NOW BEEN WHITTLED 10:23AM 20 DOWN TO THESE TWO CLAIMS. 10:23AM 21 THE LAST ORDER, OBVIOUSLY THEY'VE BEEN GIVEN LEAVE TO AMEND, I 10:23AM 22 JUST DON'T THINK THAT THEY'RE GOING TO BE ABLE TO DO IT. 10:23AM 23 THEY'RE STILL APPARENTLY RELYING ON THIS KIND OF LAYERED 10:23AM 24 APPROACH AS TO WHAT THEY CALL IT TO WHAT THE CONTRACT CONSISTS 10:23AM 25 OF. WE BELIEVE NOW THAT WE'RE ON THE THIRD AND FINAL AMENDED EITHER WE WILL GIVEN THAT POSTURE, WE BELIEVE NOW MAY BE AN APPROPRIATE IF IN GOOD FAITH FACEBOOK BELIEVES IT'S WELL, AS WE SAID IN THE CASE AND, FRANKLY, GIVEN THE REASONING OF UNITED STATES COURT REPORTERS 20 10:23AM 1 AND SO IN LIGHT OF THAT, WE JUST DON'T THINK THAT IT'S 10:23AM 2 WORTH THE TIME AND EXPENSE RIGHT NOW TO ENGAGE IN ADR, AND 10:23AM 3 WE'RE GOING TO BE DOING BRIEFING ON A MOTION TO DISMISS AND THE 10:23AM 4 CASE MAY NOT LIVE ON PAST NOVEMBER. 10:23AM 5 10:23AM 6 COLOR, THE LAYERED APPROACH TO THE FACEBOOK CONTRACT, THE TERMS 10:23AM 7 OF USE AND THE PRIVACY POLICY AND THE HELP CENTER PAGES, THAT 10:23AM 8 TERM "LAYERED APPROACH" IS NOT SOMETHING THAT WE'VE INVENTED. 10:23AM 9 FACEBOOK DESCRIBED ITS CONTRACT THAT WAY TO CONGRESS AND TO THE 10:23AM 10 10:23AM 11 10:23AM 12 USED TO DESCRIBE THE APPROACH THAT WAS IN EFFECT DURING THE 10:24AM 13 CLASS PERIOD, LAYERED APPROACH IS WHAT FACEBOOK TOLD THE 10:24AM 14 GOVERNMENT THAT THEY USED. 10:24AM 15 10:24AM 16 PER YOUR OBSERVATION, MR. STRAITE, FACEBOOK IS NOT AT THIS 10:24AM 17 POINT INTERESTED IN PURSUING FORMAL ADR. 10:24AM 18 LIKE YOU WOULD RATHER FOCUS, MR. BROWN, YOUR EFFORTS ON THIS 10:24AM 19 MOTION PRACTICE AND ACCORDING TO THE SCHEDULE THAT I'VE JUST 10:24AM 20 PROVIDED YOU. 10:24AM 21 MR. BROWN: THAT'S RIGHT. 10:24AM 22 THE COURT: SO THAT'S WHAT IT WILL BE. 10:24AM 23 GIVEN YOU THE DATES. 10:24AM 24 VIEWS ABOUT THE -- THIS DISCOVERY ISSUE AND MY SENSE IS THAT -- 10:24AM 25 AND I APPRECIATE YOUR -- PLAINTIFFS' WILLINGNESS TO WORK WITH MR. STRAITE: AND TO FURTHER PUT MORE COLOR ONTO THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION. GRANTED THAT PHRASE WAS USED AFTER OUR CLASS PERIOD BUT THE COURT: OKAY. WELL, THANK YOU. IT SOUNDS LIKE RATHER, IT SOUNDS OKAY. I'VE I'VE TALKED TO YOU ABOUT AT LEAST MY UNITED STATES COURT REPORTERS 21 10:24AM 1 FACEBOOK ON LIMITING YOUR REQUESTS AND SCOPE, AND I HOPE THAT 10:24AM 2 YOUR CLIENTS -- I HOPE THAT YOU CAN MEET AND CONFER SUCH THAT, 10:24AM 3 MR. BROWN, YOU CAN TALK TO YOUR CLIENTS ABOUT PRODUCING THESE, 10:24AM 4 WHATEVER IT IS, THE PAGES AND THAT NEED TO BE DONE. 10:25AM 5 HOPEFUL THAT IT'S NOT VOLUMINOUS AND IT'S NOT GOING TO REQUIRE 10:25AM 6 HUNDREDS OF HOURS OF ATTORNEY TIME. 10:25AM 7 10:25AM 8 MISSPOKEN WHEN I THOUGHT ABOUT HITTING THE PAUSE BUTTON. 10:25AM 9 ALREADY ASSUMED THAT YOU HAD RULED ON THE HELP CENTER PAGE 10:25AM 10 10:25AM 11 10:25AM 12 LANGUAGE FROM THE HELP CENTER PAGES THAT THEY WANT TO INCLUDE 10:25AM 13 IN THEIR COMPLAINT, AND WE WILL SEARCH FOR HISTORICAL VERSIONS 10:25AM 14 OF THOSE PAGES. 10:25AM 15 10:25AM 16 THE DISCOVERY BURDENS BEYOND THAT. 10:25AM 17 LITERALLY GOING TO GET NEW REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION PROPOUNDED 10:25AM 18 TO US? 10:25AM 19 BEFORE JUDGE COUSINS BETWEEN NOW AND NOVEMBER 16TH WHEN IT 10:25AM 20 SEEMS LIKE IT'S REALLY NOT THAT MUCH OF AN IMPOSITION ON 10:25AM 21 PLAINTIFFS UNTIL WE HOLD OFF -- 10:25AM 22 THE COURT: 10:26AM 23 MR. STRAITE: 10:26AM 24 CERTAINLY WILLING NOT TO PROPOUND ANY INTERROGATORIES, NOT A 10:26AM 25 SINGLE ONE. MR. BROWN: AND I'M JUST TO CLARIFY THAT, AND I MAY HAVE I HAD ISSUE. SO MY UNDERSTANDING IS THAT THEY WILL VERY QUICKLY GET US I GUESS WHAT I WAS TRYING TO ADDRESS IS JUST, YOU KNOW, ARE WE -- YOU KNOW, ARE WE ARE WE REALLY GOING THROUGH A MOTION TO COMPEL PRACTICE MR. STRAITE, DO YOU WANT TO CLARIFY. AS WE DISCUSSED EARLIER, WE'RE WE CAN ADDRESS THE HELP CENTER PAGES IN ADVANCE OF UNITED STATES COURT REPORTERS 22 10:26AM 1 THE THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT IN TELEPHONE CALLS AND LETTERS. WE 10:26AM 2 DON'T NEED DISCOVERY, FORMAL DISCOVERY THERE. 10:26AM 3 SERVE ANY REQUESTS FOR ADMISSIONS, AND WE ALSO WILL NOT NOTICE 10:26AM 4 ANY DEPOSITIONS UNTIL AFTER THE HEARING ON THE 16TH. 10:26AM 5 10:26AM 6 REMAINS TO BE SEEN. 10:26AM 7 AN UNDERSTANDING THAT THE CURRENT DOCUMENT REQUESTS ARE 10:26AM 8 INTERPRETED A CERTAIN WAY OR THERE'S SOME AMBIGUITIES BECAUSE 10:26AM 9 OF MY INARTFUL DRAFTING OF YEARS AGO THAT WE WOULD LIKE SOME 10:26AM 10 UNDERSTANDINGS ON HOW SOME WORDS ARE INTERPRETED. 10:26AM 11 COULD PROBABLY AVOID A SECOND ROUND OF DOCUMENT REQUESTS UNTIL 10:26AM 12 NOVEMBER 16TH IF WE CAN HAVE THOSE CONVERSATIONS, BUT I THINK 10:26AM 13 IT'S LIKELY THAT WE'LL BE ABLE TO AVOID A MOTION TO COMPEL 10:26AM 14 PRIOR TO NOVEMBER 16TH SIMPLY BECAUSE ONLY THREE CUSTODIANS 10:26AM 15 HAVE BEEN SEARCHED. 10:26AM 16 10:26AM 17 IT WILL SAY JOHN SMITH JUST BY WAY OF ILLUSTRATION. 10:27AM 18 IS A PERSON WHO KNOWS ABOUT THESE DOCUMENTS BEST, BUT THEN JOHN 10:27AM 19 SMITH'S DOCUMENTS WEREN'T SEARCHED. 10:27AM 20 10:27AM 21 LAST YEAR, BUT, OF COURSE, CRAFTING IT AROUND THE SURVIVING 10:27AM 22 CLAIMS AND CRAFTING IT AROUND JUDGE COUSINS'S PRACTICES, WE 10:27AM 23 WILL PROPOSE GETTING THAT ON FILE SOONER THAN LATER SIMPLY 10:27AM 24 BECAUSE THERE ARE SO MANY IMPORTANT ISSUES, AND WE WOULD ALSO 10:27AM 25 LIKE TO HAVE A RULING, FOR EXAMPLE, ON THE CONFIDENTIALITY WE WILL ALSO NOT WHETHER WE'LL PROPOUND ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS REQUESTS WE'RE WILLING TO HOLD THOSE OFF IF WE HAVE WE PROBABLY IN THOSE DOCUMENTS THERE ARE PEOPLE THERE WHO HAVE SAID -JOHN SMITH GIVEN A MOTION TO COMPEL SIMILAR TO THE ONE WE HAD FILED UNITED STATES COURT REPORTERS 23 10:27AM 1 DESIGNATIONS SO THAT IF AND WHEN WE GET PAST THE MOTION TO 10:27AM 2 DISMISS WE'RE ABLE TO AT THAT POINT IMMEDIATELY NOTICE 10:27AM 3 DEPOSITIONS IF WE HAVE FURTHER DOCUMENTS. 10:27AM 4 HOLDING UP THE PROCESS BETWEEN NOW AND NOVEMBER DOES NOT 10:27AM 5 MEAN WE CAN THEN HIT THE GROUND RUNNING ON NOVEMBER 17TH, THE 10:27AM 6 DAY AFTER THE HEARING, BECAUSE THAT WOULD MEAN WE WOULD THEN 10:27AM 7 HAVE TO FILE OUR MOTION ON NOVEMBER 17TH AND THERE WOULD BE 10:27AM 8 MOTION PRACTICE AND KNOW WHEN JUDGE COUSINS IS AVAILABLE. 10:27AM 9 MAY PUSH OFF DISCOVERY YET ANOTHER SIX MONTHS AND EVEN AFTER 10:27AM 10 YOUR HONOR RULES. 10:27AM 11 PRACTICE STARTED NOW EVEN THOUGH WE'RE NOT WILLING TO NOT DO 10:27AM 12 DEPOSITIONS AND NOT DO INTERROGATORIES AND NOT DO RFA'S IN THE 10:27AM 13 INTERIM. 10:27AM 14 10:27AM 15 DO YOU SEE THAT COMPRISING? 10:28AM 16 SHOULD THEY BE BURDENED WITH A WHOLE HOST OF OTHER DISCOVERY 10:28AM 17 MOTIONS NOTWITHSTANDING YOUR REQUEST FOR JUST THESE DISCRETE 10:28AM 18 HELP PAGE INFORMATIONS? 10:28AM 19 PANDORA'S BOX HERE? 10:28AM 20 10:28AM 21 REALLY ASKING THAT FACEBOOK ACTUALLY RESPOND TO THE DOCUMENTS 10:28AM 22 THAT WE ASKED FOR FIVE YEARS AGO AND THAT WE HAVE HAD MEET AND 10:28AM 23 CONFERS WITH THREE YEARS AGO. 10:28AM 24 10:28AM 25 THAT SO IT'S IMPORTANT TO GET THAT MOTION THE COURT: WELL, WHAT DOES THAT -- THANK YOU. MR. STRAITE: WHAT I MEAN, TO MR. BROWN'S POINT, WHAT DOES THAT -- IS THIS OPENING A I DON'T THINK SO, YOUR HONOR. WE'RE FACEBOOK HAS NOT PRODUCED A SINGLE DOCUMENT IN MORE THAN A YEAR AND A HALF. THEY HAVE SIMPLY REFUSED TO PARTICIPATE IN UNITED STATES COURT REPORTERS 24 10:28AM 1 DISCOVERY DURING THE PENDENCY OF A MOTION TO STAY WHICH WAS 10:28AM 2 EVENTUALLY DENIED. 10:28AM 3 PARTY TO UNILATERALLY GRANT ITSELF A STAY WHILE THEIR MOTION TO 10:28AM 4 STAY IS PENDING. 10:28AM 5 10:28AM 6 RELATED, AGAIN, TO THE HELP PAGES AND THE CONTRACT ISSUE, NOT 10:28AM 7 THE BROAD ISSUES THAT PREVIOUSLY WERE IN THE CASE? 10:28AM 8 10:28AM 9 10:28AM 10 10:29AM 11 10:29AM 12 FACEBOOK PROMISE THAT THEY WOULD NOT MONITOR POST-BROWSING 10:29AM 13 LOGOUT AND DID THEY IN FACT BREACH THAT CONTRACT OR BREACH THAT 10:29AM 14 IMPLIED TERM OR BREACH THE IMPLIED COVENANT OF GOOD FAITH AND 10:29AM 15 FAIR DEALING? 10:29AM 16 10:29AM 17 WHETHER OR NOT IT ACTUALLY HAPPENED WILL STILL BE RELEVANT SO 10:29AM 18 THERE'S A SIGNIFICANT CHUNK OF THE DOCUMENTS THAT WE REQUESTED 10:29AM 19 BEFORE TO UNDERSTAND WHAT ACTUALLY HAPPENED DURING THE CLASS 10:29AM 20 PERIOD THAT ARE STILL RELEVANT. 10:29AM 21 WE OFFERED TO MEET AND CONFER LAST WEEK WITH MATT 10:29AM 22 REGARDING THE SCOPE OF THOSE DOCUMENT REQUESTS, WHICH ONE WE 10:29AM 23 CAN CUT OUT. 10:29AM 24 THAT MEET AND CONFER AFTER TODAY'S HEARING AND SO WE DEFERRED 10:29AM 25 THAT CONVERSATION FURTHER. WE CAN'T FIND A SINGLE CASE THAT GIVES A THE COURT: SO THE INFORMATION YOU NEED NOW WOULD BE MR. STRAITE: YES AND NO, YOUR HONOR. CERTAINLY WE WOULD NOT -- NO LONGER SEEK DISCOVERY RELATED TO ANY DISMISSED CLAIM, SOLELY RELATED TO THAT DISMISSED CLAIM. HOWEVER, THE QUESTION IN THE CONTRACT CLAIM IS DID SO MOST OF THE DOCUMENTS WE REQUESTED BEFORE REGARDING MATT SUGGESTED IT WOULD BE MORE EFFICIENT TO HAVE SO I KNOW NOTHING FURTHER SPECIFIC UNITED STATES COURT REPORTERS 25 10:29AM 1 BECAUSE WE WERE NOT ABLE TO MEET AND CONFER LAST WEEK. 10:29AM 2 10:29AM 3 ANYTHING. 10:29AM 4 OBJECTIONS AS WELL AS COMMITMENTS TO PRODUCE CERTAIN CATEGORIES 10:29AM 5 OF THINGS. THEY DIDN'T ALWAYS SEE EYE TO EYE WITH OUR 10:29AM 6 RESPONSES. WE HAD EXTENSIVE MEET AND CONFERS, AND THAT 10:30AM 7 RESULTED THEN IN THE MOTION TO COMPEL THAT THEY FILED. 10:30AM 8 10:30AM 9 10:30AM 10 THAT THE PARTIES WERE AT LOGGERHEADS ON WHETHER WE WOULD HAVE 10:30AM 11 ADDITIONAL OBLIGATIONS OR NOT. 10:30AM 12 10:30AM 13 TO COLLECT FROM ADDITIONAL CUSTODIANS IF THEY HAD BEEN 10:30AM 14 REASONABLE IN MEET AND CONFERS, BUT THEY INSTEAD TOOK A VERY 10:30AM 15 HARDLINE POSITION THAT THERE WERE THESE 20-PLUS ADDITIONAL 10:30AM 16 CUSTODIANS THAT WE HAD TO COLLECT FROM WHICH WAS JUST A 10:30AM 17 NONSTARTER. 10:30AM 18 10:30AM 19 LITIGATING A MOTION TO COMPEL IN AN ODD WAY AT THIS CMC, BUT 10:30AM 20 THERE'S A LONG HISTORY HERE. 10:30AM 21 THE RECORD IS CLEAR THAT WE HAVE NOT BEEN SORT OF REFUSING TO 10:30AM 22 DO ANYTHING. 10:30AM 23 BEEN CRYSTALLIZED. 10:30AM 24 10:30AM 25 MR. BROWN: YEAH, WE HAVE NOT REFUSED TO DO WE HAVE -- WE RESPONDED TO THEIR RFP'S WITH SOME SO ALL OF THE ISSUES THERE HAVE BEEN CRYSTALLIZED. NOT AS THOUGH WE HAVE BEEN REFUSING TO DO ANYTHING. IT'S IT'S JUST AND I WOULD TELL YOU, FOR INSTANCE, THAT WE WERE WILLING SO THERE'S A WHOLE HISTORY HERE, AND I FEEL LIKE WE'RE AND I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT IT'S JUST THAT ALL OF THE ISSUES HAVE ALREADY MY CONCERN IS THAT, I MEAN, THERE'S GOING TO BE NO WAY THAT WE CAN GET MOTIONS TO COMPEL BRIEFED AND HEARD AND IF THE UNITED STATES COURT REPORTERS 26 10:31AM 1 MOTION TO COMPEL IS GRANTED IN PART AND IN OUR FAVOR, ACTUALLY 10:31AM 2 COLLECT AND REVIEW AND PRODUCE DOCUMENTS BEFORE AUGUST 25TH 10:31AM 3 WHICH IS WHEN THEIR COMPLAINT IS DUE. 10:31AM 4 10:31AM 5 CENTER PAGE ISSUE. 10:31AM 6 NEED IN ORDER TO FILE THEIR COMPLAINT, BUT THERE'S REALLY VERY 10:31AM 7 LITTLE BURDEN ON THE PLAINTIFFS TO SIMPLY WAIT UNTIL YOUR HONOR 10:31AM 8 RULES ON THE NEXT ROUND OF MOTION TO DISMISS AND SEE IF 10:31AM 9 ANYTHING ACTUALLY GETS THROUGH BEFORE WE UNDERTAKE ALL OF THIS 10:31AM 10 10:31AM 11 10:31AM 12 VERY IMPORTANT POINT. 10:31AM 13 PARALLEL IS THE BURDEN THAT HE'S REFERRING TO, AND I THINK HE'S 10:31AM 14 RIGHT. 10:31AM 15 10:31AM 16 FILE A MOTION TO COMPEL UNTIL SEPTEMBER 8TH, AND THAT WAY HE'S 10:31AM 17 NOT BRIEFING DOCUMENTS IN PARALLEL WITH THAT. 10:31AM 18 ACCEPTABLE? 10:31AM 19 10:31AM 20 10:31AM 21 THE COURT: 10:32AM 22 MR. STRAITE: 10:32AM 23 GUESSING ABOUT THE RELIEF PART. 10:32AM 24 THE COURT: 10:32AM 25 SO ALL I'M SAYING IS THAT I HEAR YOUR HONOR ON THE HELP THAT WOULD GIVE THEM WHAT THEY SAY THEY OTHER BURDEN AND DOCUMENT PRODUCTION. MR. STRAITE: AND, YOUR HONOR, I THINK MATT HIT ON A THE IDEA OF BRIEFING TWO BRIEFS IN AND IF IT WOULD HELP YOUR HONOR, WE ARE WILLING TO NOT MR. BROWN: WOULD THAT BE NO, THAT WAS NOT QUITE WHAT I WAS GETTING AT. A BIG SIGH OF RELIEF. IT WAS A BIG SIGH OF RELIEF. I'M WELL, I APPRECIATE THE POSITIONS THAT YOU'RE BOTH IN, AND I HOPE YOU APPRECIATE MINE. UNITED STATES COURT REPORTERS I'M TRYING TO 27 10:32AM 1 ASSIST YOU IN GETTING SOME CLARITY ON THE CASE, AND I THINK WE 10:32AM 2 HAVE DONE THIS OVER THE LAST FOUR YEARS. 10:32AM 3 AT LEAST TWO DISCRETE ISSUES. 10:32AM 4 YOU'RE GOING TO CONTINUE TO MEET AND CONFER AS TO THE 10:32AM 5 INFORMATION ON THE HELP CENTER PAGES THAT I THINK COULD ASSIST 10:32AM 6 YOU AND INFORM YOU AS TO HOW AND HOW YOU SHOULD FILE YOUR THIRD 10:32AM 7 AMENDED COMPLAINT IN THIS CASE. 10:32AM 8 10:32AM 9 10:32AM 10 NEED, AND I'M HOPING THAT FACEBOOK CAN PROVIDE AS MUCH AS YOU 10:32AM 11 FEEL YOU CAN PROVIDE WITHOUT GOING TO JUDGE COUSINS AND TRYING 10:32AM 12 TO GET ADDITIONAL DISCOVERIES. 10:32AM 13 10:32AM 14 I HOPE YOU CAN GET THIS DONE IN THAT TIME. 10:33AM 15 BEEN COLLEAGUE OPPOSITES HERE FOR QUITE SOME TIME AND WORKING 10:33AM 16 TOGETHER ON THIS CASE, AND I APPRECIATE YOUR CONTINUED EFFORTS 10:33AM 17 IN THAT REGARD. 10:33AM 18 MR. STRAITE: 10:33AM 19 THE COURT: 10:33AM 20 MR. STRAITE: 10:33AM 21 HOUSEKEEPING ISSUES. 10:33AM 22 THE COURT: 10:33AM 23 MR. STRAITE: 10:33AM 24 CIRCULATED TO FACEBOOK, I NEGLECTED TO NOTIFY YOU OF TWO SMALL 10:33AM 25 ADDITIONAL MOTIONS THAT WILL BE COMING YOUR WAY. I THINK YOU KNOW MY POSITION. THE CASE IS DOWN TO I'D LIKE YOU BOTH TO MEET AND CONFER AND TO PROVIDE AS MUCH AS YOU CAN, ASK FOR WHAT YOU I'M NOT GOING TO DISTURB THE TIMING THAT I JUST GAVE YOU. AND I KNOW YOU'VE THANK YOU, YOUR HONOR. ALL RIGHT. IS THERE IS ONE -- A COUPLE OF YES. IN THE DRAFT CMC STATEMENT THAT WE UNITED STATES COURT REPORTERS YOU KNOW THAT 28 10:33AM 1 THEY'RE UPWARDS OF 20 OR 30 INDIVIDUAL CASES THAT WERE 10:33AM 2 CONSOLIDATED HERE. 10:33AM 3 AND WE'VE BEEN WORKING WITH THEM, BUT THERE ARE TWO PLAINTIFFS, 10:33AM 4 I UNDERSTAND, IN TWO CONSOLIDATED CASES REPRESENTED BY TWO 10:33AM 5 DIFFERENT FIRMS THAT WE'VE NEVER WORKED WITH, AND WE HAVE NEVER 10:33AM 6 GIVEN THEM WORK FOR REASONS UNRELATED TO THE MERITS OF THE 10:33AM 7 CASE. 10:33AM 8 I'LL FACILITATE THAT. 10:33AM 9 THAT THESE MIGHT BE COMING IN THE NEXT WEEK OR TWO OR THREE, 10:33AM 10 10:33AM 11 10:34AM 12 10:34AM 13 MR. BROWN: NOTHING FROM ME. 10:34AM 14 THE COURT: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. 10:34AM 15 10:34AM 16 MR. STRAITE: 10:34AM 17 MR. BROWN: THANK YOU. 10:34AM 18 THE CLERK: COURT IS ADJOURNED. 10:34AM 19 COUNSEL WERE APPOINTED TO LEADERSHIP ROLES, THEY'VE ASKED ME IF IT WOULD BE OKAY TO WITHDRAW AND AND I JUST WANTED TO GIVE YOU A HEADS UP BUT THEY'RE NOT RELATED TO THE MERITS. THE COURT: OKAY. THANK YOU. I APPRECIATE THAT. ANYTHING FURTHER? BOTH. THANK YOU. (COURT CONCLUDED AT 10:34 A.M.) 20 21 22 23 24 25 UNITED STATES COURT REPORTERS GOOD SEEING YOU 1 2 3 CERTIFICATE OF REPORTER 4 5 6 7 I, THE UNDERSIGNED OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER OF THE UNITED 8 STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, 9 280 SOUTH FIRST STREET, SAN JOSE, CALIFORNIA, DO HEREBY 10 11 CERTIFY: THAT THE FOREGOING TRANSCRIPT, CERTIFICATE INCLUSIVE, IS 12 A CORRECT TRANSCRIPT FROM THE RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE 13 ABOVE-ENTITLED MATTER. 14 15 16 17 18 19 ______________________________ IRENE RODRIGUEZ, CSR, RMR, CRR CERTIFICATE NUMBER 8074 DATED: JULY 31, 2017 20 21 22 23 24 25 UNITED STATES COURT REPORTERS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?