In Re FACEBOOK INTERNET TRACKING LITIGATION
Filing
39
ORDER granting # 37 Stipulation Concerning Briefing Schedule and Page Limits For Facebook's Motion to Dismiss. Facebook's Motion shall not exceed 35 pages. Plaintiffs shall file their opposition to the Motion on or before July 31,2012, and the opposition shall not exceed 35 pages; AND Facebook shall file its reply in support of the Motion on or before August 22, 2012, and the reply shall not exceed 25 pages. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 6/18/2012. (ejdlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/18/2012) Modified text on 6/19/2012 (ecg, COURT STAFF).
S
UNIT
ED
Attorneys for Defendant F ACEBOOK, INC.
(Additional parties on signature page)
ER
R NIA
w a rd J .
Davila
A
H
5
RT
4
d
J u d ge E
FO
8
3
LI
7
2
D
RDERE
IS SO O
IT
NO
6
COOLEYLLP
MICHAEL G. RHODES (116127)
(rhodesmg@cooley.com)
MATTHEW D. BROWN (196972)
(brownmd@cooley.com)
JEFFREY M. GUTKIN (216083)
Ggutkin@cooley.com))
101 California Street, 5th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111-5800
Telephone:
(415) 693-2000
Facsimile:
(415) 693-2222
RT
U
O
1
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
SAN JOSE DIVISION
13
14
In re: Facebook Internet Tracking Litigation
Case No. 12-md-02314 EJD
15
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CONCERNING BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND
PAGE LIMITS FOR FACEBOOK'S MOTION
TO DISMISS (CIV. L.R. 6-2 & 7-4(b ))
16
17
18
JUDGE:
COURTROOM:
TRIAL DATE:
19
Edward J. Davila
4
Not Yet Set
20
21
Plaintiffs Perrin Davis, Cynthia Quinn, Brian Lentz, and Matthew Vickery (collectively,
22
"Plaintiffs") and Defendant Facebook, Inc. ("Facebook") (Plaintiffs and Facebook collectively,
23
the "Parties") by and through their respective counsel, hereby make a stipulated request for an
24
Order concerning the briefing schedule and page limits for Facebook's anticipated motion to
25
dismiss Plaintiffs' Corrected First Amended Consolidated Class Action Complaint. This
26
stipulated request is made pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(b )(1) and Civil Local
27
Rules 6-2 and 7-4(b) and is supported by the concurrently filed Declaration of Jeffrey M. Gutkin.
28
COOLEYLLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO
1.
STIP. & (PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING
SCHEDULE & PAGE LIMITS
CASE No.l2-MD-02314 EJD
1
WHEREAS, on February 8, 2012, the Panel on Multidistrict Litigation issued an order
2
transferring actions filed across the United States to this Court under the caption above for
3
coordinated or consolidated proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 1407;
4
WHEREAS, on April 3, 2012, the Court ordered that Plaintiffs file a consolidated
5
amended complaint no later than 45 days from the date upon which the order was filed, which
6
was May 18, 2012;
7
8
9
WHEREAS, the Court also ordered that Facebook's answer or responsive motion be filed
no later than 90 days from the date upon which the order was filed, which is July 2, 2012;
WHEREAS Plaintiffs filed their First Amended Consolidated Class Action Complaint on
10
May 17, 2012 and their Corrected First Amended Consolidated Class Action Complaint
11
("Complaint") on May 23, 2012;
12
WHEREAS the 43-page Complaint alleges 11 causes of action against Facebook;
13
WHEREAS Facebook anticipates filing a motion to dismiss the Complaint (the "Motion")
14
on July 2, 2012;
15
WHEREAS, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-3, the deadline for Plaintiffs to file their
16
opposition to the Motion would be July 16, 2012, and the deadline for Face book to file its reply in
17
support of the Motion would be July 23, 2012;
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
WHEREAS the first date available on this Court's calendar to hear the Motion is
September 14, 2012, at the earliest;
WHEREAS there have been no previous time modifications since the Court ordered
consolidation of the actions, whether by stipulation or Court order;
WHEREAS altering the briefing schedule on the Motion will not affect the date or
deadline of any event or deadline already affixed by the Court; AND
WHEREAS the Parties believe that a modest extension of the briefing schedule and
25
enlargement of the page limits is reasonable in light of the nature of the case and the Complaint,
26
and will provide the Court with more thorough and useful briefing on the issues.
27
28
NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties hereby stipulate and agree as follows, subject to
approval and order of the Court:
COOLEYLLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO
2.
STIP. & (PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING
SCHEDULE & PAGE LIMITS
CASE No.l2-MD-02314 EJD
1
1.
Facebook's Motion shall not exceed 35 pages;
2
2.
Plaintiffs shall file their opposition to the Motion on or before July 31,2012, and
3
4
5
the opposition shall not exceed 35 pages; AND
3.
Facebook shall file its reply in support of the Motion on or before August 22,
2012, and the reply shall not exceed 25 pages.
6
7
Dated: June 6, 2012
8
COOLEYLLP
Is/ Jeffrey M Gutkin
JEFFREY M. GUTKIN
9
Attorneys for Defendant FACEBOOK, INC.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Dated: June 6, 2012
BARTIMUS, FRICKLETON, ROBERTSON, &
GORNY, P.C.
Is/ Edward D. Robertson, Jr.
EDWARD D. ROBERTSON, JR.
Attorneys for Plaintiffs PERRIN DAVIS,
CYNTHIA QUINN, BRIAN LENTZ, and
MATTHEW VICKERY
BARTIMUS, FRICKLETON, ROBERTSON, &
GORNY,P.C.
EDWARD D. ROBERTSON, JR.
(chipro b@earthlink.net)
STEPHEN M. GORNY
JAMES P. FRICKLETON
MARY D. WINTER
EDWARD D. ROBERTSON III
11150 Overbook Road, Suite 200
Leawood, KS 66211
Telephone:
(913) 266-2300
Facsimile:
(913) 266-2366
25
26
27
28
COOLEYLLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO
3.
STIP. & [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING
SCHEDULE & PAGE LIMITS
CASE No.l2-MD-02314 EJD
1
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
3
4
June 18, 2012
DATED: _______________
The Honorable Edward J. Davila
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
COOLEYLLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO
4.
STIP. & (PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING
SCHEDULE & PAGE LIMITS
CASE No.l2-MD-02314 EJD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?