In Re FACEBOOK INTERNET TRACKING LITIGATION

Filing 49

STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER CHANGING HEARING DATE FOR DEFENDANT FACEBOOK, INC.'S # 44 MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS CORRECTED FIRST AMENDED CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT filed by Facebook Inc.. (Gutkin, Jeffrey) (Filed on 7/26/2012) Modified on 7/27/2012 (cv, COURT STAFF).

1

6

COOLEY LLP
MICHAEL G. RHODES (116127)
([e-mail])
MATTHEW D. BROWN (196972)
([e-mail])
JEFFREY M. GUTKIN (216083)
([e-mail]))
101 California Street, 5th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111-5800
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]

7

Attorneys for Defendant FACEBOOK, INC.

8

(Additional counsel on signature page)

2
3
4
5

9
10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12

SAN JOSE DIVISION

13
14

In re: Facebook Internet Tracking Litigation

Case No. 12-md-02314 EJD
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CHANGING HEARING DATE FOR
DEFENDANT FACEBOOK, INC.’S MOTION
TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ CORRECTED
FIRST AMENDED CONSOLIDATED CLASS
ACTION COMPLAINT

15
16
17
18

JUDGE:
COURTROOM:
TRIAL DATE:

19
20

Edward J. Davila
4
Not Set

21
22

Plaintiffs Perrin Davis, Cynthia Quinn, Brian Lentz, and Matthew Vickery (collectively,

23

“Plaintiffs”) and Defendant Facebook, Inc. (“Facebook”) (Plaintiffs and Facebook collectively,

24

the “Parties”), by and through their respective counsel, hereby request an Order changing the date

25

for hearing Facebook’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Corrected First Amended Consolidated

26

Class Action Complaint and supporting papers (Dkt. Nos. 44-47) (the “Motion”).

27
28

WHEREAS Facebook’s Motion is currently noticed for hearing on September 21, 2012, at
9:00 a.m.;

COOLEY LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

1.

STIP. & [PROPOSED] ORDER RE
HEARING DATE
CASE NO. 12-MD-02314 EJD

1

WHEREAS on June 29, 2012, the Court held a Case Management Conference in this

2

action, wherein the Parties’ counsel informed the Court that they would confer regarding

3

changing the hearing date for the Motion—from September 21 to September 28, October 5, or

4

October 12—to accommodate a calendar conflict that the September 21 hearing posed for

5

Plaintiffs’ counsel;

6
7

WHEREAS the Court’s minute order after the Case Management Conference stated:
“The parties to submit proposed order re dates for hearing Motion to Dismiss” (Dkt. No. 43);

8
9

WHEREAS the Parties’ counsel have conferred and agreed to change the hearing date for
the Motion from September 21, 2012, at 9:00 a.m., to October 5, 2012 at 9:00 a.m.;

10

//

11

//

12

//

13

//

14

//

15

//

16

//

17

//

18

//

19

//

20

//

21

//

22

//

23

//

24

//

25

//

26

//

27

//

28

//

COOLEY LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

2.

STIP. & [PROPOSED] ORDER RE
HEARING DATE
CASE NO. 12-MD-02314 EJD

1
2
3

NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties hereby stipulate and agree as follows, subject to
approval and Order of the Court:
Facebook’s Motion is set for hearing in this Court on October 5, 2012 at 9:00 a.m.

4
5

Dated: July 26, 2012

COOLEY LLP

6

/s/ Jeffrey M. Gutkin
JEFFREY M. GUTKIN

7

Attorneys for Defendant FACEBOOK, INC.

8
9

Dated: July 26, 2012

10

/s/ Edward D. Robertson, Jr.
EDWARD D. ROBERTSON, JR.

11

BARTIMUS, FRICKLETON, ROBERTSON, &
GORNY, P.C.
EDWARD D. ROBERTSON, JR.
([e-mail])
JAMES P. FRICKLETON
STEPHEN M. GORNY
MARY D. WINTER
EDWARD D. ROBERTSON III
11150 Overbook Road, Suite 200
Leawood, KS 66211
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]

12
13
14
15
16
17
18

STEWARTS LAW US LLP
DAVID A. STRAITE
RALPH N. SIANNI
MICHELE S. CARINO
LYDIA E. YORK
1201 North Orange Street
Wilmington, DE 19801
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]

19
20
21
22
23
24
25

BARTIMUS, FRICKLETON, ROBERTSON, &
GORNY, P.C.

[PROPOSED] ORDER
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

26
27
28

DATED: ___________________

_________________________________________
The Honorable Edward J. Davila
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

COOLEY LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

3.

STIP. & [PROPOSED] ORDER RE
HEARING DATE
CASE NO. 12-MD-02314 EJD

1
2
3

ATTESTATION
In accordance with Northern District of California Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest
that I have obtained concurrence in the filing of this Declaration from the signatory listed above.

4
5
6

/s/ Jeffrey M. Gutkin
JEFFREY M. GUTKIN

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
COOLEY LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

4.

STIP. & [PROPOSED] ORDER RE
HEARING DATE
CASE NO. 12-MD-02314 EJD