In Re FACEBOOK INTERNET TRACKING LITIGATION
Filing
99
STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Concerning Page Limits for Briefing on Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint and Date of Case Management Conference filed by Facebook Inc.. (Brown, Matthew) (Filed on 12/30/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Michael G. Rhodes (116127)
Matthew D. Brown (196972)
Jeffrey M. Gutkin (216083)
Kyle C. Wong (224021)
COOLEY LLP
101 California Street, 5th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111-5800
Tel.: (415) 693-2000
Fax: (415) 693-2222
rhodesmg@cooley.com
brownmd@cooley.com
jgutkin@cooley.com
kwong@cooley.com
Attorneys for Defendant
FACEBOOK, INC.
9
10
[Additional Counsel on Signature Page]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
12
13
14
Case No. 12-md-02314 EJD
15
STIPULATED REQUEST AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER CONCERNING PAGE LIMITS FOR
BRIEFING ON MOTION TO DISMISS
SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT AND
DATE OF CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE
16
In re: Facebook Internet Tracking Litigation
17
18
19
JUDGE:
COURTROOM:
TRIAL DATE:
20
Edward J. Davila
4
Not Yet Set
21
22
Plaintiffs Perrin Davis, Cynthia Quinn, Brian Lentz, and Matthew Vickery (collectively,
23
“Plaintiffs”) and Defendant Facebook, Inc. (“Facebook”) (Plaintiffs and Facebook collectively,
24
the “Parties”) by and through their respective counsel, hereby make a stipulated request for an
25
order concerning the page limits for the briefing on Facebook’s forthcoming motion to dismiss
26
Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Consolidated Class Action Complaint (“Second Amended
27
Complaint”), and to continue the Case Management Conference set for January 14, 2015.
28
COOLEY LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO
125818790
1.
JOINT STIP. & [PROPOSED] ORDER RE
PAGE LIMITS AND CMC
CASE NO. 12-MD-02314 EJD
1
WHEREAS on February 8, 2012, the Panel on Multidistrict Litigation issued an order
2
transferring actions filed across the United States to this Court under the caption above for
3
coordinated or consolidated proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407;
4
5
WHEREAS Plaintiffs filed their Corrected First Amended Consolidated Class Action
Complaint (“First Amended Complaint,” Dkt. #35) on May 23, 2012;
6
WHEREAS the Court extended the page limits for the briefing on Facebook’s motion to
7
dismiss the First Amended Complaint to 35 pages for the motion to dismiss and opposition brief
8
and 25 pages for the reply brief (Dkt. #37);
9
10
WHEREAS on July 2, 2012, Facebook filed a motion to dismiss the First Amended
Complaint (Dkt. #44);
11
WHEREAS on October 23, 2015, the Court granted Facebook’s motion to dismiss with
12
leave to amend on or before November 30, 2015, and setting a Case Management Conference for
13
January 14, 2015 (Dkt. #87);
14
WHEREAS on November 24, 2015, the Court granted the Parties’ Joint Stipulation and
15
Proposed Order setting the briefing schedule on Facebook’s anticipated motion to dismiss the
16
Second Amended Complaint (the “Motion to Dismiss”), according to which Facebook’s Motion
17
to Dismiss shall be filed on or before January 14, 2016, Plaintiffs’ opposition shall be filed on or
18
before February 18, 2016, and Facebook’s reply shall be filed on or before March 10, 2016, and
19
the hearing on the Motion to Dismiss is scheduled for April 28, 2016;
20
WHEREAS Plaintiffs filed their Second Amended Complaint on November 30, 2015;
21
WHEREAS the Second Amended Complaint consists of 57 pages and 11 causes of action,
22
including five new causes of action;
23
WHEREAS the Parties believe that an enlargement of the page limits for the briefing on
24
the Motion to Dismiss is reasonable in light of the nature of the case, the length of the Second
25
Amended Complaint, the number of causes of action, recent developments in the law and the new
26
causes of action, and will provide the Court with more thorough and useful briefing on the issues;
27
and
28
COOLEY LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO
125818790
2.
JOINT STIP. & [PROPOSED] ORDER RE
PAGE LIMITS AND CMC
CASE NO. 12-MD-02314 EJD
1
WHEREAS, in light of the Second Amended Complaint, the forthcoming Motion to
2
Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint, and the briefing and hearing schedule ordered by the
3
Court, the Parties believe that continuing the Case Management Conference to April 28, 2016
4
(the same date on which the hearing on the Motion to Dismiss is scheduled) will conserve judicial
5
and party resources, and will not otherwise affect the case schedule.
6
7
NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties hereby stipulate and agree as follows, subject to
approval and order of the Court:
8
1.
Facebook’s Motion to Dismiss shall not exceed 40 pages;
9
2.
Plaintiffs’ opposition to the Motion to Dismiss shall not exceed 40 pages;
10
3.
Facebook’s reply in support of the Motion to Dismiss shall not exceed 25 pages;
4.
The Case Management Conference scheduled for January 14, 2016 shall be
11
12
and
13
continued to April 28, 2016 at 9:00 a.m. (the same date on which the hearing on the Motion to
14
Dismiss is scheduled).
15
16
Dated: December 30, 2015
COOLEY LLP
/s/ Matthew D. Brown
MATTHEW D. BROWN
Attorneys for Defendant FACEBOOK, INC.
17
18
19
Dated: December 30, 2015
SILVERMAN THOMPSON
SLUTKIN WHITE LLC
20
/s/ Stephen G. Grygiel
STEPHEN G. GRYGIEL
21
22
27
Stephen G. Grygiel (admitted pro hac vice)
SILVERMAN THOMPSON
SLUTKIN WHITE LLC
201 N. Charles Street, 26TH Floor
Baltimore, MD 21201
Tel.: (410) 385-2225
Fax: (410) 547-2432
sgrygiel@mdattorney.com
28
Interim Co-Lead Class Counsel
23
24
25
26
COOLEY LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO
125818790
3.
JOINT STIP. & [PROPOSED] ORDER RE
PAGE LIMITS AND CMC
CASE NO. 12-MD-02314 EJD
1
Dated: December 30, 2015
KAPLAN FOX & KILSHEIMER LLP
2
/s/ David A. Straite
DAVID A. STRAITE
3
4
David A. Straite (admitted pro hac vice)
KAPLAN FOX & KILSHEIMER LLP
850 Third Avenue, 14th Floor
New York, NY 10022
Tel.: (212) 687-1980
Fax: (212) 687-7714
dstraite@kaplanfox.com
5
6
7
8
Laurence D. King (206423)
KAPLAN FOX & KILSHEIMER LLP
350 Sansome Street, 4th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
Tel.: (415) 772-4700
Fax: (415) 772-4707
lking@kaplanfox.com
9
10
11
12
Interim Co-Lead Class Counsel
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
COOLEY LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO
125818790
4.
JOINT STIP. & [PROPOSED] ORDER RE
PAGE LIMITS AND CMC
CASE NO. 12-MD-02314 EJD
[PROPOSED] ORDER
1
2
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
3
4
5
DATED: ___________________
6
_________________________________________
The Honorable Edward J. Davila
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
COOLEY LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO
125818790
5.
JOINT STIP. & [PROPOSED] ORDER RE
PAGE LIMITS AND CMC
CASE NO. 12-MD-02314 EJD
ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 5-1(i)(3)
1
2
3
4
I, Matthew D. Brown, attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been
obtained from each of the other signatories.
Dated: December 30, 2015
5
/s/ Matthew D. Brown
MATTHEW D. BROWN
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
COOLEY LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO
125818790
6.
JOINT STIP. & [PROPOSED] ORDER RE
PAGE LIMITS AND CMC
CASE NO. 12-MD-02314 EJD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?