Castro-Garcia v. Brennan et al

Filing 8

ORDER That Case Be Reassigned to a District Judge. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 1/17/2013. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/17/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 *E-FILED: January 17, 2013* 3 4 5 6 NOT FOR CITATION 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN JOSE DIVISION 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 7 12 13 14 15 16 No. C13-00006 HRL JOSE GUADALUPE CASTRO-GARCIA, ORDER THAT CASE BE REASSIGNED TO A DISTRICT JUDGE Plaintiff, v. TIMOTHY JOSEPH BRENNAN, M.D. and CLINICA DE SALUD DEL VALLE DE SALINAS, Defendants. / 17 18 Defendants have filed a motion to dismiss. Because not all parties have consented to 19 magistrate jurisdiction, the undersigned lacks jurisdiction to hear that motion. Accordingly, IT 20 IS ORDERED THAT the Clerk of the Court shall reassign this case to a district judge. See 28 21 U.S.C. ยง 636; Civ. L.R. 73-1. 22 Dated: January 17, 2013 23 HOWARD R. LLOYD 24 25 26 27 28 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 1 5:13-cv-00006-HRL Notice has been electronically mailed to: 2 James A. Scharf james.scharf@usdoj.gov, mimi.lam@usdoj.gov 3 4 5:13-cv-00006-HRL Notice sent by U.S. Mail to: 5 6 Jose Guadalupe Castro-Garcia 9243 Campo de Casa Castroville, CA 95012 7 Pro Se Plaintiff 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?