Lockhart v. Janda
Filing
7
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. The Clerk shall serve by certified mail a copy of this order and the petition (Docket No. 1) and all attachments thereto on Respondent and Respondent's attorney, the Attorney General of the State of California. The Clerk also shall serve a copy of this order on Petitioner. Habeas Answer due by 5/13/2013. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 3/14/2013. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/14/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
MICHAEL A. LOCKHART,
Petitioner,
12
13
vs.
14
G. J. JANDA,
15
Respondent.
16
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. C 13-0014 EJD (PR)
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
(Docket No. 6)
17
Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a petition for a writ of
18
19
habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, challenging his state conviction.
20
21
BACKGROUND
22
According to the petition, Petitioner was found guilty of possession of
23
cocaine for sale and transportation of a controlled substance after a jury trial in
24
Alameda County. (Pet. at 2.) Petitioner was sentenced to 25 years to life in prison.
25
(Id.)
26
27
28
Petitioner appealed his conviction, and the state appellate court affirmed. (Id.
at 3.) The state high court denied review. (Id.)
Petitioner filed the instant federal habeas petition on January 2, 2013.
Order to Show Cause
0014Lockhart_osc.wpd
DISCUSSION
1
2
A.
Standard of Review
This court may entertain a petition for a writ of habeas corpus “in behalf of a
3
4
person in custody pursuant to the judgment of a State court only on the ground that
5
he is in custody in violation of the Constitution or laws or treaties of the United
6
States.” 28 U.S.C. § 2254(a).
It shall “award the writ or issue an order directing the respondent to show
7
8
cause why the writ should not be granted, unless it appears from the application that
9
the applicant or person detained is not entitled thereto.” Id. § 2243.
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
B.
Legal Claims
Petitioner claims the following as grounds for federal habeas relief: (1) the
12
trial court erred by failing to dismiss a prior strike; and (2) the trial court erroneously
13
denied a Batson motion after the prosecutor used peremptory challenges to remove
14
black jurors. Liberally construed, these claim are cognizable under § 2254 and merit
15
an answer from Respondent.
16
Petitioner had also filed a one page motion stating that he wished to exhaust
17
further claims regarding prosecutorial misconduct, ineffective assistance of counsel
18
and due process violations. Motion to Amend at 1. The Court provided Petitioner
19
with several options on how to proceed: 1) file a motion requesting a Rhines stay; 2)
20
request a King/Kelly stay; or 3) proceed with the exhausted claims. Petitioner has
21
filed a motion (Docket No. 6) indicating he wishes to proceed with the exhausted
22
claims of the petition.
CONCLUSION
23
24
For the foregoing reasons and for good cause shown,
25
1.
26
27
28
Petitioner’s motion to proceed with the exhausted claims (Docket No.
6), is GRANTED and no stay will be ordered.
2.
The Clerk shall serve by certified mail a copy of this order and the
petition (Docket No. 1) and all attachments thereto on Respondent and Respondent’s
Order to Show Cause
0014Lockhart_osc.wpd
2
1
attorney, the Attorney General of the State of California. The Clerk also shall serve
2
a copy of this order on Petitioner.
3
3.
Respondent shall file with the court and serve on petitioner, within
4
sixty (60) days of the issuance of this order, an answer conforming in all respects to
5
Rule 5 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, showing cause why a writ of
6
habeas corpus should not be issued. Respondent shall file with the answer and serve
7
on Petitioner a copy of all portions of the state trial record that have been transcribed
8
previously and that are relevant to a determination of the issues presented by the
9
petition.
If Petitioner wishes to respond to the answer, he shall do so by filing a
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
traverse with the Court and serving it on Respondent within thirty (30) days of his
12
receipt of the answer.
13
4.
Respondent may file a motion to dismiss on procedural grounds in lieu
14
of an answer, as set forth in the Advisory Committee Notes to Rule 4 of the Rules
15
Governing Section 2254 Cases. If Respondent files such a motion, Petitioner shall
16
file with the Court and serve on Respondent an opposition or statement of non-
17
opposition within thirty (30) days of receipt of the motion, and Respondent shall
18
file with the court and serve on Petitioner a reply within fifteen (15) days of receipt
19
of any opposition.
20
5.
Petitioner is reminded that all communications with the court must be
21
served on Respondent by mailing a true copy of the document to Respondent’s
22
counsel. Petitioner must also keep the Court and all parties informed of any change
23
of address.
24
This order terminates Docket No. 6.
25
26
DATED:
3/14/2013
EDWARD J. DAVILA
United States District Judge
27
28
Order to Show Cause
0014Lockhart_osc.wpd
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case Number CV 13-00014 EJD (PR)
MICHAEL A. LOCKHART,
Petitioner,
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
vs.
G. J. JANDA,
Respondent.
____________________________________/
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S.
District Court, Northern District of California.
3/14/2013
That on ______________________________, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the
attached, by placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the
person(s)hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said
copy(ies) inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office.
Michael A. Lockhart
AF-4021
Calipatria State Prison
7018 Blair Road
Calipatria, CA 92233
3/14/2013
DATED: ________________________
Richard W. Wieking, Clerk
/s/By: Elizabeth Garcia, Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?