Benedict v. Hewlett-Packard Company
Filing
12
STIPULATION AND ORDER extending defendant's time to answer or otherwise respond to plaintiff's complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on January 30, 2013. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/30/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
Attorneys for Defendant Hewlett-Packard Company
Kelly M. Dermody (Cal. Bar No. 171716)
Jahan C. Sagafi (Cal. Bar No. 224887)
Marc A. Pilotin (Cal Bar No. 266369)
LIEFF, CABRASER, HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN, LLP
275 Battery Street, 29th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111-3339
Telephone: (415) 956-1000
Facsimile: (415) 956-1008
E-Mail: kdermody@lchb.com
E-Mail: jsagafi@lchb.com
E-Mail: mpilotin@lchb.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff and proposed Class Members
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
17
18
SAN JOSE DIVISION
ERIC BENEDICT, on behalf of himself and
classes of those similarly situated,
Plaintiff,
19
20
21
22
23
24
*E-FILED: January 30, 2013*
Wendy M. Lazerson, SBN 97285
wlazerson@sidley.com
Caryn F. Horner, SBN 273500
chorner@sidley.com
SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
1001 Page Mill Road
Building 1
Palo Alto, California 94304
Telephone: (650) 565-7000
Facsimile: (650) 565-7100
v.
HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. C13-0119
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER EXTENDING DEFENDANT’S
TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE
RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S
COMPLAINT
CURRENT DATE: February 1, 2013
DATE REQUESTED: February 22, 2013
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
Case No.: C13-0119
1
DEFENDANT AND PLAINTIFF HEREBY STIPULATE AS FOLLOWS:
2
The deadline for Defendant Hewlett-Packard Company (“HP”) to answer or otherwise
3
respond to the Complaint in the above-entitled action, served on HP on January 11, 2013, shall be
4
extended to February 22, 2013, subject to the approval of the Court.
5
Dated: January 29, 2013
SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
6
7
By: /s/ Wendy M. Lazerson
Wendy M. Lazerson
Caryn F. Horner
Attorneys for Defendant Hewlett-Packard
Company
8
9
10
11
Dated: January 29, 2013
LIEFF, CABRASER, HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN,
LLP
12
13
14
By: /s/ Jahan C. Sagafi
Kelly M. Dermody
Jahan S. Sagafi
Marc A. Pilotin
Attorneys for Plaintiff and proposed Class
Members
15
16
17
ORDER
18
19
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
20
21
January 30,
Dated: ________________, 2013
22
_______________________________________
HOWARD R. LLOYD
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
23
24
25
26
27
28
SF1 1522695v.1
1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
Case No.: C13-0119
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?