Benedict v. Hewlett-Packard Company

Filing 12

STIPULATION AND ORDER extending defendant's time to answer or otherwise respond to plaintiff's complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on January 30, 2013. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/30/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Attorneys for Defendant Hewlett-Packard Company Kelly M. Dermody (Cal. Bar No. 171716) Jahan C. Sagafi (Cal. Bar No. 224887) Marc A. Pilotin (Cal Bar No. 266369) LIEFF, CABRASER, HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN, LLP 275 Battery Street, 29th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111-3339 Telephone: (415) 956-1000 Facsimile: (415) 956-1008 E-Mail: kdermody@lchb.com E-Mail: jsagafi@lchb.com E-Mail: mpilotin@lchb.com Attorneys for Plaintiff and proposed Class Members 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 17 18 SAN JOSE DIVISION ERIC BENEDICT, on behalf of himself and classes of those similarly situated, Plaintiff, 19 20 21 22 23 24 *E-FILED: January 30, 2013* Wendy M. Lazerson, SBN 97285 wlazerson@sidley.com Caryn F. Horner, SBN 273500 chorner@sidley.com SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 1001 Page Mill Road Building 1 Palo Alto, California 94304 Telephone: (650) 565-7000 Facsimile: (650) 565-7100 v. HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. C13-0119 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEFENDANT’S TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT CURRENT DATE: February 1, 2013 DATE REQUESTED: February 22, 2013 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT Case No.: C13-0119 1 DEFENDANT AND PLAINTIFF HEREBY STIPULATE AS FOLLOWS: 2 The deadline for Defendant Hewlett-Packard Company (“HP”) to answer or otherwise 3 respond to the Complaint in the above-entitled action, served on HP on January 11, 2013, shall be 4 extended to February 22, 2013, subject to the approval of the Court. 5 Dated: January 29, 2013 SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 6 7 By: /s/ Wendy M. Lazerson Wendy M. Lazerson Caryn F. Horner Attorneys for Defendant Hewlett-Packard Company 8 9 10 11 Dated: January 29, 2013 LIEFF, CABRASER, HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN, LLP 12 13 14 By: /s/ Jahan C. Sagafi Kelly M. Dermody Jahan S. Sagafi Marc A. Pilotin Attorneys for Plaintiff and proposed Class Members 15 16 17 ORDER 18 19 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 20 21 January 30, Dated: ________________, 2013 22 _______________________________________ HOWARD R. LLOYD UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 23 24 25 26 27 28 SF1 1522695v.1 1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT Case No.: C13-0119

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?