Benedict v. Hewlett-Packard Company

Filing 342

ORDER Construing 339 as an administrative motion; ordering Defendant to file a response no later than July 6, 2015. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 6/30/2015. (blflc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/30/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 7 ERIC BENEDICT, Case No. 13-cv-00119-BLF Plaintiff, 8 11 ORDER (1)CONSTRUING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME AND COMPEL PRODUCTION AS AN ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION; ORDERING DEFENDANT TO RESPOND WITHIN FOUR (4) DAYS 12 [Re: ECF 339] v. 9 10 HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY, United States District Court Northern District of California Defendant. 13 14 On June 30, 2015, Plaintiffs filed a motion seeking an extension of time to file their reply 15 brief in support of class certification, as well as to compel Defendant’s production of certain 16 documents. ECF 339. 17 The Court hereby construes this motion as an administrative motion brought pursuant to 18 Civil Local Rule 7-11, and ORDERS Defendant to respond, in no more than five (5) pages, by 12 19 p.m. on July 6, 2015. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 30, 2015 ______________________________________ BETH LABSON FREEMAN United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?