Benedict v. Hewlett-Packard Company
Filing
342
ORDER Construing 339 as an administrative motion; ordering Defendant to file a response no later than July 6, 2015. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 6/30/2015. (blflc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/30/2015)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
SAN JOSE DIVISION
6
7
ERIC BENEDICT,
Case No. 13-cv-00119-BLF
Plaintiff,
8
11
ORDER
(1)CONSTRUING PLAINTIFFS'
MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME AND
COMPEL PRODUCTION AS AN
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION;
ORDERING DEFENDANT TO
RESPOND WITHIN FOUR (4) DAYS
12
[Re: ECF 339]
v.
9
10
HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY,
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Defendant.
13
14
On June 30, 2015, Plaintiffs filed a motion seeking an extension of time to file their reply
15
brief in support of class certification, as well as to compel Defendant’s production of certain
16
documents. ECF 339.
17
The Court hereby construes this motion as an administrative motion brought pursuant to
18
Civil Local Rule 7-11, and ORDERS Defendant to respond, in no more than five (5) pages, by 12
19
p.m. on July 6, 2015.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: June 30, 2015
______________________________________
BETH LABSON FREEMAN
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?