Benedict v. Hewlett-Packard Company

Filing 392

ORDER GRANTING 391 DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED REDACTIONS TO THE COURT'S ORDER DENYING CLASS CERTIFICATION. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 4/8/2016. (blflc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/8/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 SAN JOSE DIVISION 8 9 ERIC BENEDICT, Case No. 13-cv-00119-BLF Plaintiff, 10 v. United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY, Defendant. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED REDACTIONS TO THE COURT'S ORDER DENYING CLASS CERTIFICATION [Re: ECF 391] 13 14 15 Before the Court is Defendant’s unopposed motion to redact portions of the Court’s Order 16 Denying Plaintiffs’ Motion to Certify Class, currently filed under seal. ECF 391. Defendant seeks 17 to file portions of two lines of the Order—6:17 and 29:20—under seal because they pertain to the 18 salaries of putative class members. ECF 391. Defendant attaches a declaration explaining that HP 19 treats information about its employees, including salary information, as confidential and takes 20 reasonable steps to limit its disclosure, in part to avoid violating its employees’ privacy interests. 21 Menz Decl. ¶ 6, ECF 391-2. 22 Having reviewed the proposed redactions and the accompanying declaration, the Court 23 finds that Defendant has met the “compelling reasons” standard set forth in Kamakana v. City & 24 Cty. of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178 (9th Cir. 2006). In addition, the Court finds that the 25 proposed redactions are narrowly tailored and seek only to seal confidential information, 26 consistent with Civil Local Rule 79-5(d)(1)(C). 27 28 As such, Defendant’s motion to file the salary information contained in lines 6:17 and 29:20 of the Order is GRANTED. Defendant is ORDERED to file a copy of the Order with those 1 2 3 4 5 portions redacted by no later than April 15, 2016. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 8, 2016 ______________________________________ BETH LABSON FREEMAN United States District Judge 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?