Benedict v. Hewlett-Packard Company
Filing
449
ORDER GRANTING AS MODIFIED 448 STIPULATION RE-SETTING DATES FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT HEARING AND FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman. Motion Hearing set for 8/18/2016 01:30 PM. Pretrial Conference set for 9/22/2016 01:30 PM. (blflc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/15/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
6
Wendy M. Lazerson (Cal. Bar No. 97285)
SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
1001 Page Mill Rd., Building 1
Palo Alto, California 94304
Telephone: (650) 565-7000
Facsimile: (650) 565-7100
E-Mail: wlazerson@sidley.com
Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant
Hewlett-Packard Company
[Additional counsel on signature page]
12
Kelly M. Dermody (Cal. Bar No. 171716)
Daniel M. Hutchinson (Cal. Bar No. 239458)
Anne B. Shaver (Cal. Bar No. 255928)
LIEFF, CABRASER, HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN, LLP
275 Battery Street, 29th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111-3339
Telephone: (415) 956-1000
Facsimile: (415) 956-1008
E-Mail: kdermody@lchb.com
E-Mail: dhutchinson@lchb.com
E-Mail: ashaver@lchb.com
13
Attorneys for Plaintiffs and proposed Class Members
7
8
9
10
11
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
SAN JOSE DIVISION
17
18
19
20
ERIC BENEDICT, RICHARD
BOWDERS, KILRICANOS VIEIRA, and
DAVID MUSTAIN, on behalf of
themselves and classes of those similarly
situated,
Plaintiffs,
21
22
23
24
Case No. C 13-0119 BLF
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
RE-SETTING DATES FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT HEARING AND FINAL
PRETRIAL CONFERENCE AS MODIFIED
v.
HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY,
Defendant.
25
26
27
28
1
STIP. RESETTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT HEARING AND FINAL PRETRIAL CONF.
CASE NO. 13-0119 BLF
1
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs Eric Benedict and David Mustain (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendant
2
Hewlett-Packard Company (“HP”) are in discussions to resolve the case and have engaged with a
3
mediator for that purpose;
4
WHEREAS, HP’s Motion for Summary Judgment against Plaintiffs on their individual
5
claims is currently set for hearing July 21, 2016, and there are several other upcoming deadlines
6
based on the Final Pretrial Conference, currently scheduled for August 18, 2016, at 1:30 p.m.;
7
WHEREAS, the parties believe it would be productive to defer the Summary Judgment
8
hearing and Final Pretrial Conference to provide them time to engage with the mediator in an
9
attempt to the resolve the case;
10
WHEREAS, the parties have met and conferred and jointly reached a proposal for a modified
11
schedule that would give the parties such time while still keeping the current trial date (October 3,
12
2016) and still holding the Final Pretrial Conference more than two weeks in advance of the trial
13
date, consistent with this Court’s Standing Order;
14
THEREFORE, the parties hereby stipulate and request that the Court enter an Order:
15
1.
16
17
18
19
20
21
Resetting the hearing on HP’s Motion for Summary Judgment from July 21, 2016, at
9:00 a.m., to August 18, 2016, at 1:30 p.m.;
2.
Resetting the Final Pretrial Conference from August 18, 2016 at 1:30 p.m. to
September 15 22, 2016, at 1:30 p.m.;
3.
All deadlines that are based on the Final Pretrial Conference as set forth in the
Court’s Standing Order(s) shall be reset accordingly; and
4.
All other dates shall remain the same.
22
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
23
Dated: July 15, 2016
24
25
SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
By: /s/ Wendy M. Lazerson
Wendy M. Lazerson
26
27
28
1
Wendy M. Lazerson (Cal. Bar No. 97285)
Dorna Moini (Cal. Bar No. 287115)
SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
1001 Page Mill Road
Building 1
Palo Alto, California 94304
STIP. RESETTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT HEARING AND FINAL PRETRIAL CONF.
CASE NO. 13-0119 BLF
Telephone: (650) 565-7000
Facsimile: (650) 565-7100
E-Mail: wlazerson@sidley.com
E-Mail: dmoini@sidley.com
1
2
3
Max C. Fischer (Cal. Bar No. 226003)
David R. Carpenter (Cal. Bar No. 230299)
SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
555 West Fifth Street, Suite 4000
Los Angeles, California 90013-1010
Telephone: (213) 896-6000
Facsimile: (213) 896-6600
E-Mail: mfischer@sidley.com
E-Mail: drcarpenter@sidley.com
4
5
6
7
8
9
Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant
Hewlett-Packard Company
10
11
12
13
Dated: July 15, 2016
LIEFF CABRASER HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN, LLP
By: /s/ Jahan C. Sagafi
Jahan C. Sagafi
Kelly M. Dermody (Cal. Bar No. 171716)
Daniel M. Hutchinson (Cal. Bar No. 239458)
Anne B. Shaver (Cal. Bar No. 255928)
Marc A. Pilotin (Cal. Bar No. 266369)
LIEFF, CABRASER, HEIMANN &
BERNSTEIN, LLP
275 Battery Street, 29th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111-3339
Telephone: (415) 956-1000
Facsimile: (415) 956-1008
E-Mail: kdermody@lchb.com
E-Mail: dhutchinson@lchb.com
E-Mail: ashaver@lchb.com
E-Mail: mpilotin@lchb.com
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
Adam T. Klein (admitted pro hac vice)
Juno Turner (admitted pro hac vice)
OUTTEN & GOLDEN LLP
3 Park Avenue, 29th Floor
New York, New York 10016
Telephone: (212) 245-1000
Facsimile: (212) 977-4005
E-Mail: atk@outtengolden.com
E-Mail: jturner@outtengolden.com
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
STIP. RESETTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT HEARING AND FINAL PRETRIAL CONF.
CASE NO. 13-0119 BLF
Jahan C. Sagafi (Cal. Bar No. 224887)
OUTTEN & GOLDEN LLP
One Embarcadero Center, 38th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: (415) 638-8800
Facsimile: (415) 638-8810
E-Mail: jsagafi@outtengolden.com
Attorneys for Plaintiffs, Counterdefendant and
proposed Class Members
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS ORDERED AS MODIFIED ABOVE.
9
10
Dated: July 15, 2016
__________________________________
The Honorable Beth Labson Freeman
United States District Judge
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIP. RESETTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT HEARING AND FINAL PRETRIAL CONF.
CASE NO. 13-0119 BLF
ATTESTATION OF SIGNATURE
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), the filer of this document attests that concurrence in
the filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatory above.
DATED: July 15, 2016
SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
By: /s/ Wendy M. Lazerson
Attorneys for Defendant and
Counterclaimant Hewlett-Packard Company
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
STIP. RESETTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT HEARING AND FINAL PRETRIAL CONF.
CASE NO. 13-0119 BLF
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?