Benedict v. Hewlett-Packard Company

Filing 449

ORDER GRANTING AS MODIFIED 448 STIPULATION RE-SETTING DATES FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT HEARING AND FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman. Motion Hearing set for 8/18/2016 01:30 PM. Pretrial Conference set for 9/22/2016 01:30 PM. (blflc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/15/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 Wendy M. Lazerson (Cal. Bar No. 97285) SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 1001 Page Mill Rd., Building 1 Palo Alto, California 94304 Telephone: (650) 565-7000 Facsimile: (650) 565-7100 E-Mail: wlazerson@sidley.com Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant Hewlett-Packard Company [Additional counsel on signature page] 12 Kelly M. Dermody (Cal. Bar No. 171716) Daniel M. Hutchinson (Cal. Bar No. 239458) Anne B. Shaver (Cal. Bar No. 255928) LIEFF, CABRASER, HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN, LLP 275 Battery Street, 29th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111-3339 Telephone: (415) 956-1000 Facsimile: (415) 956-1008 E-Mail: kdermody@lchb.com E-Mail: dhutchinson@lchb.com E-Mail: ashaver@lchb.com 13 Attorneys for Plaintiffs and proposed Class Members 7 8 9 10 11 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 SAN JOSE DIVISION 17 18 19 20 ERIC BENEDICT, RICHARD BOWDERS, KILRICANOS VIEIRA, and DAVID MUSTAIN, on behalf of themselves and classes of those similarly situated, Plaintiffs, 21 22 23 24 Case No. C 13-0119 BLF STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE-SETTING DATES FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT HEARING AND FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE AS MODIFIED v. HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY, Defendant. 25 26 27 28 1 STIP. RESETTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT HEARING AND FINAL PRETRIAL CONF. CASE NO. 13-0119 BLF 1 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs Eric Benedict and David Mustain (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendant 2 Hewlett-Packard Company (“HP”) are in discussions to resolve the case and have engaged with a 3 mediator for that purpose; 4 WHEREAS, HP’s Motion for Summary Judgment against Plaintiffs on their individual 5 claims is currently set for hearing July 21, 2016, and there are several other upcoming deadlines 6 based on the Final Pretrial Conference, currently scheduled for August 18, 2016, at 1:30 p.m.; 7 WHEREAS, the parties believe it would be productive to defer the Summary Judgment 8 hearing and Final Pretrial Conference to provide them time to engage with the mediator in an 9 attempt to the resolve the case; 10 WHEREAS, the parties have met and conferred and jointly reached a proposal for a modified 11 schedule that would give the parties such time while still keeping the current trial date (October 3, 12 2016) and still holding the Final Pretrial Conference more than two weeks in advance of the trial 13 date, consistent with this Court’s Standing Order; 14 THEREFORE, the parties hereby stipulate and request that the Court enter an Order: 15 1. 16 17 18 19 20 21 Resetting the hearing on HP’s Motion for Summary Judgment from July 21, 2016, at 9:00 a.m., to August 18, 2016, at 1:30 p.m.; 2. Resetting the Final Pretrial Conference from August 18, 2016 at 1:30 p.m. to September 15 22, 2016, at 1:30 p.m.; 3. All deadlines that are based on the Final Pretrial Conference as set forth in the Court’s Standing Order(s) shall be reset accordingly; and 4. All other dates shall remain the same. 22 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 23 Dated: July 15, 2016 24 25 SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP By: /s/ Wendy M. Lazerson Wendy M. Lazerson 26 27 28 1 Wendy M. Lazerson (Cal. Bar No. 97285) Dorna Moini (Cal. Bar No. 287115) SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 1001 Page Mill Road Building 1 Palo Alto, California 94304 STIP. RESETTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT HEARING AND FINAL PRETRIAL CONF. CASE NO. 13-0119 BLF Telephone: (650) 565-7000 Facsimile: (650) 565-7100 E-Mail: wlazerson@sidley.com E-Mail: dmoini@sidley.com 1 2 3 Max C. Fischer (Cal. Bar No. 226003) David R. Carpenter (Cal. Bar No. 230299) SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 555 West Fifth Street, Suite 4000 Los Angeles, California 90013-1010 Telephone: (213) 896-6000 Facsimile: (213) 896-6600 E-Mail: mfischer@sidley.com E-Mail: drcarpenter@sidley.com 4 5 6 7 8 9 Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant Hewlett-Packard Company 10 11 12 13 Dated: July 15, 2016 LIEFF CABRASER HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN, LLP By: /s/ Jahan C. Sagafi Jahan C. Sagafi Kelly M. Dermody (Cal. Bar No. 171716) Daniel M. Hutchinson (Cal. Bar No. 239458) Anne B. Shaver (Cal. Bar No. 255928) Marc A. Pilotin (Cal. Bar No. 266369) LIEFF, CABRASER, HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN, LLP 275 Battery Street, 29th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111-3339 Telephone: (415) 956-1000 Facsimile: (415) 956-1008 E-Mail: kdermody@lchb.com E-Mail: dhutchinson@lchb.com E-Mail: ashaver@lchb.com E-Mail: mpilotin@lchb.com 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Adam T. Klein (admitted pro hac vice) Juno Turner (admitted pro hac vice) OUTTEN & GOLDEN LLP 3 Park Avenue, 29th Floor New York, New York 10016 Telephone: (212) 245-1000 Facsimile: (212) 977-4005 E-Mail: atk@outtengolden.com E-Mail: jturner@outtengolden.com 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 STIP. RESETTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT HEARING AND FINAL PRETRIAL CONF. CASE NO. 13-0119 BLF Jahan C. Sagafi (Cal. Bar No. 224887) OUTTEN & GOLDEN LLP One Embarcadero Center, 38th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 638-8800 Facsimile: (415) 638-8810 E-Mail: jsagafi@outtengolden.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs, Counterdefendant and proposed Class Members 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS ORDERED AS MODIFIED ABOVE. 9 10 Dated: July 15, 2016 __________________________________ The Honorable Beth Labson Freeman United States District Judge 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 STIP. RESETTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT HEARING AND FINAL PRETRIAL CONF. CASE NO. 13-0119 BLF ATTESTATION OF SIGNATURE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), the filer of this document attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatory above. DATED: July 15, 2016 SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP By: /s/ Wendy M. Lazerson Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant Hewlett-Packard Company 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 STIP. RESETTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT HEARING AND FINAL PRETRIAL CONF. CASE NO. 13-0119 BLF

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?