Benedict v. Hewlett-Packard Company
Filing
51
Order by Hon. Lucy H. Koh denying as moot 41 Motion for TRO and Ordering Parties to Meet and Confer.(lhklc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/13/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
8
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
12
13
14
15
Plaintiff,
v.
HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY,
Defendant.
16
17
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
ERIC BENEDICT, on behalf of himself and
classes of those similarly situated,
Case No.: 13-CV-0119-LHK
ORDER
DENYING
EX
PARTE
APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY
RESTRAINING ORDER AND ORDER
TO MEET AND CONFER RE MOTION
TO FILE FIRST AMENDED ANSWER
AND COUNTERCLAIMS
In light of the Court’s Order to Meet and Confer, ECF No. 49, and the Joint Report of
18
Parties Regarding Meet and Confer on Disputed Material, ECF No. 50, the Court DENIES as moot
19
Defendant Hewlett-Packard Company's Ex Parte Application for Temporary Restraining Order,
20
Evidence Preservation Order, Order for Expedited Discovery, and Order to Show Cause re:
21
Issuance of Preliminary Injunction, ECF No. 41.
22
The Court also ORDERS the parties to meet and confer regarding Defendant’s Motion to
23
File First Amended Answer and Counterclaims, ECF No. 46, by May 16, 2013, and to file a joint
24
status report on this motion by May 17, 2013.
25
The Court urges the parties to be more cooperative and reasonable.
26
IT IS SO ORDERD.
27
May 13, 2013
28
_________________________________
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge
1
Case No.: 13-CV-0119-LHK
ORDER DENYING TRO; ORDER TO MEET AND CONFER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?