Benedict v. Hewlett-Packard Company

Filing 51

Order by Hon. Lucy H. Koh denying as moot 41 Motion for TRO and Ordering Parties to Meet and Confer.(lhklc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/13/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 8 SAN JOSE DIVISION 11 12 13 14 15 Plaintiff, v. HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY, Defendant. 16 17 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ERIC BENEDICT, on behalf of himself and classes of those similarly situated, Case No.: 13-CV-0119-LHK ORDER DENYING EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND ORDER TO MEET AND CONFER RE MOTION TO FILE FIRST AMENDED ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIMS In light of the Court’s Order to Meet and Confer, ECF No. 49, and the Joint Report of 18 Parties Regarding Meet and Confer on Disputed Material, ECF No. 50, the Court DENIES as moot 19 Defendant Hewlett-Packard Company's Ex Parte Application for Temporary Restraining Order, 20 Evidence Preservation Order, Order for Expedited Discovery, and Order to Show Cause re: 21 Issuance of Preliminary Injunction, ECF No. 41. 22 The Court also ORDERS the parties to meet and confer regarding Defendant’s Motion to 23 File First Amended Answer and Counterclaims, ECF No. 46, by May 16, 2013, and to file a joint 24 status report on this motion by May 17, 2013. 25 The Court urges the parties to be more cooperative and reasonable. 26 IT IS SO ORDERD. 27 May 13, 2013 28 _________________________________ LUCY H. KOH United States District Judge 1 Case No.: 13-CV-0119-LHK ORDER DENYING TRO; ORDER TO MEET AND CONFER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?