Benedict v. Hewlett-Packard Company
Filing
52
ORDER re: Protective Order. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on May 14, 2013. (lhklc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/14/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
8
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
12
ERIC BENEDICT, on behalf of himself and
classes of those similarly situated,
13
14
15
16
17
Plaintiff,
v.
HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 13-CV-0119-LHK
ORDER RE: PROTECTIVE ORDER
On May 8, 2013, pursuant to this Court’s Order, the parties submitted a Joint Letter Brief
18
addressing whether Opt-In Plaintiffs in the instant case should be given access to Defendant’s
19
discovery designated “CONFIDENTIAL.” ECF No. 39.
20
The extent to which FLSA opt-in plaintiffs are subject to individualized discovery remains
21
unsettled. See Hoffman v. Constr. Protective Servs., Inc., 541 F.3d 1175, 1179 (9th Cir. 2008)
22
(noting that the district court in that action had recognized this area of the law as unsettled);
23
Coldiron v. Pizza Hut, Inc., CV03-05865TJHMCX, 2004 WL 2601180 (C.D. Cal. Oct. 25, 2004)
24
(recognizing two lines of cases regarding individualized discovery in opt-in class actions). In the
25
parties’ Joint Letter Brief, neither party cites to precedent governing opt-in plaintiffs’ access to
26
materials designated as confidential, or the implications of such access for individualized
27
discovery. Furthermore, each of the cases Defendant cites as authority for opt-in discovery refers
28
to discovery following conditional certification of an opt-in class. See Hill v. R&L Carriers Shared
1
Case No.: 13-CV-0119-LHK
ORDER RE: PROTECTIVE ORDER
1
Services, LLC, CV 09-1907 CW MEJ, 2010 WL 3769247, at *2 (N.D. Cal. Sept. 22, 2010);
2
Coldiron, 2004 WL 2601180, at *2; Abubakar v. City of Solano, CIVS-06-2268LKKEFB, 2008
3
WL 508911, at *2 (E.D. Cal. Feb. 22, 2008). In the instant case, Plaintiff’s Motion for Conditional
4
FLSA Certification will be heard on September 19, 2013.
5
The Court finds that at this stage of the litigation, prior to conditional certification, Opt-In
6
Plaintiffs may access Defendant’s discovery designated “CONFIDENTIAL,” under the conditions
7
Plaintiff proposes in the Joint Letter Brief. However, any Opt-In Plaintiff who chooses to access
8
such material shall also be subject to reciprocal, reasonable, and appropriate discovery.
9
IT IS SO ORDERD.
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
May 14, 2013
11
_________________________________
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Case No.: 13-CV-0119-LHK
ORDER RE: PROTECTIVE ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?