Hiramanek et al v. Clark et al

Filing 173

ORDER revoking IFP status for Appeal No. 14-17056 re 170 USCA Memorandum,. Signed by Judge Ronald M Whyte on 10/27/2014. (rmwlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/27/2014)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
12

ADIL K HIRAMANEK and RODA K
HIRAMANEK,

13

Case No. 13-00228

Plaintiffs,

14

v.

15

L. MICHAEL CLARK, et al.,

16

ORDER REVOKING IN FORMA
PAUPERIS STATUS FOR APPEAL

Defendants.

[Re Docket No. 170]
17
18
19

Per the referral of the Ninth Circuit, Dkt. No. 170, the court finds that Appeal No. 14-17056

20

is not taken in good faith under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). The court’s order denying a preliminary

21

injunction, Dkt. No. 164, is based on the denial of plaintiffs’ motion for leave to amend the

22

complaint. Without leave to amend, there are no claims supporting the requested preliminary

23

injunction. Because the appellate court will not review the denial of the motion for leave, see Dkt.

24

No. 171, there is nothing to review regarding the denial of the preliminary injunction. Accordingly,

25

the appeal is not taken in good faith and the court revokes plaintiffs’ in forma pauperis status for

26

Appeal No. 14-17056.

27

IT IS SO ORDERED.

28
ORDER
Case No. 13-CV-00228-RMW
LM

-1-

1

Dated: October 27, 2014

_________________________________
Ronald M. Whyte
United States District Judge

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER
Case No. 13-CV-00228-RMW
LM

-2-