Hiramanek et al v. Clark et al

Filing 312

ORDER RE: DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER re 272 , 311 by Judge Paul S. Grewal on October 9, 2015 (psglc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/9/2015)

s

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

ADIL HIRAMANEK, et al.,
Plaintiffs,

8
v.

9

L. MICHAEL CLARK, et al.,
Defendants.

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12

14
15
16
17
18

ORDER RE: MOTION FOR
PROTECTIVE ORDER
(Re: Docket Nos. 272, 311)

10

13

Case No. 13-cv-00228-RMW

Pursuant to Civ. L.R. 7-1(b), the court finds that Defendants’ motion for a protective order1
is suitable for determination without oral argument. Accordingly, the court takes the hearing for
the motion off the court’s calendar. The deadline for Plaintiff Adil Hiramanek to file any
opposition to Defendant’s motion remains 6:00 PM on October 9, 2015, as set by the court’s
previous order granting Hiramanek’s ex parte motion to enlarge time.2
SO ORDERED.
Dated: October 9, 2015

19

_________________________________
PAUL S. GREWAL
United States Magistrate Judge

20
21
22
23
24
25
1

See Docket No. 272.

2

See Docket No. 301.

26
27
28

1
Case No.13-cv-00228-RMW
ORDER RE: MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER