Hiramanek et al v. Clark et al

Filing 383

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S EX PARTE MOTION FOR MULTIPLE RELIEF by Magistrate Judge Paul Singh Grewal denying 381 (psglc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/18/2015)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

ADIL HIRAMANEK, et al.,
Plaintiffs,

8
v.

9
10

L. MICHAEL CLARK, et al.,

United States District Court
Northern District of California

12

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S EX
PARTE MOTION FOR MULTIPLE
RELIEF
(Re: Docket No. 381)

Defendants.

11

13

Case No. 13-cv-00228-RMW

The court has ordered that any further discovery motions from any party to this case are to
be filed as noticed motions and will be briefed on the court’s regular schedule pursuant to Civ.
L.R. 7-2(a).1 Plaintiff Adil Hiramanek nevertheless has filed another ex parte motion for
discovery relief.2 In part, Hiramanek asks the court to issue a third-party subpoena on Sylvia
Sanchez as a way to obtain documents from Defendant Beth Miller. This belongs in a noticed
motion to compel production from Miller. Similarly, Hiramanek can pursue the other relief he
seeks in a motion to compel. Consistent with its previous order, the court DENIES the instant
motion.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: November 18, 2015

22

_________________________________
PAUL S. GREWAL
United States Magistrate Judge

23
24
25
1

See Docket No. 340.

2

See Docket No. 381.

26
27
28

1
Case No. 13-cv-00228-RMW
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S EX PARTE MOTION FOR MULTIPLE RELIEF