Hiramanek et al v. Clark et al

Filing 505

ORDER Regarding Papers Filed After Summary Judgment Deadlines. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 2/12/2016. (rmwlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/12/2016)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SAN JOSE DIVISION

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12

ADIL HIRAMANEK, et al.,

Case No. 5:13-cv-00228-RMW

Plaintiffs,
13
v.

ORDER REGARDING PAPERS FILED
AFTER SUMMARY JUDGMENT
DEADLINES

14
15

L. MICHAEL CLARK, et al.,
Defendants.

16
17

On February 5, 2016, this court held a hearing on cross-motions for summary judgment in

18

this matter that were filed on December 30 and 31, 2015. Dkt. Nos. 430, 435, 436, 438. Since

19

February 5, 2016, plaintiff Adil Hiramanek has filed, among other papers, at least three

20

“declarations” or “requests for judicial notice” that purport to be in support of plaintiffs’ motion

21

for summary judgment. Dkt. Nos. 494, 501, 502. The January 21, 2016 deadline for replies in

22

support of summary judgment passed weeks ago. The court will not consider untimely filings

23

regarding the parties’ summary judgment motions. See Civ. L.R. 7-3(d).

24
25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: February 12, 2016
______________________________________
Ronald M. Whyte
United States District Judge
1
5:13-cv-00228-RMW
ORDER REGARDING PAPERS FILED AFTER SUMMARY JUDGMENT DEADLINES
RS