Avoy v. Turtle Mountain, LLC

Filing 21

Order by Hon. Lucy H. Koh granting 20 Stipulation.(lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/8/2013)

Case5:13-cv-00236-LHK Document20-2 Filed05/06/13 Page1 of 2

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16

Ben F. Pierce Gore (SBN 128515)
PRATT & ASSOCIATES
1871 The Alameda, Suite 425
San Jose, CA 95126
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
Larry C. Hunter (admitted pro hac vice)
PROVOST UMPHREY LAW FIRM, LLP
490 Park Street
P. O. Box 4905
Beaumont, TX 77005
Telephone: [phone]
Fascimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
KIM AVOY
William L. Stern (CA SBN 96105)
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
425 Market Street
San Francisco, California 94105-2482
Telephone: [phone]
Fascimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant
TURTLE MOUNTAIN, LLC
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN JOSE DIVISION

17
18
19

KIM AVOY, individually and on behalf of
all others similarly situated,

No. CV 13-0236-LHK

22

vs.

[PROPOSED] ORDER ON JOINT
STIPULATION RE BRIEFING
SCHEDULE ON DEFENDANT’S
MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S
ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

23

TURTLE MOUNTAIN, LLC,

Action Filed:

24

Defendants.

Judge: Hon. Lucy H. Koh

20
21

Plaintiff,

January 17, 2013

25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATION RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON DEFENDANT’S
MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

CASE NO. CV 13-0236 – LHK

Case5:13-cv-00236-LHK Document20-2 Filed05/06/13 Page2 of 2

ORDER

1
2
3
4
5
6

The Court, having considered the stipulation of the Parties, and for good cause shown,
orders as follows:
(1)

Plaintiff shall have until June 19, 2013, to file her opposition to Defendant’s Motion

to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Original Complaint;
(2)

Defendant shall have until July 19, 2013, to file its reply.

7
8
9
10
11

IT IS SO ORDERED.

8, 2013
DATED: May _____, 2013
THE HONORABLE LUCY H. KOH
Lucy H. Koh
United States District Judge

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

[PROPOSED] ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATION RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON DEFENDANT’S
MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

CASE NO. CV 13-0236 – LHK

1