Muan v. Vitug et al

Filing 53

ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANTS TO PROVIDE PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW. Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on March 14, 2014. (psglc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/14/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SAN JOSE DIVISION United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 NELSON MUAN, Plaintiff, v. NORA and BENEDICT VITUG, individually and together dba NORBEL’S RCH, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 5:13-cv-0331-PSG ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANTS TO PROVIDE PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW The undersigned’s standing order requires each party to file proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law ten court days before the pretrial conference. As of this moment, 45 days after 18 the pretrial conference and 30 days after the end of trial, the Vitugs have yet to comply with this 19 20 requirement. The Vitugs shall provide the court with their proposed findings of fact and 21 conclusions of law by March 21, 2014. 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 Dated: March 14, 2014 24 _________________________________ PAUL S. GREWAL United States Magistrate Judge 25 26 27 28 1 Case No. 5:13-cv-0331-PSG ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANTS TO PROVIDE PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?