Plumlee v. Pfizer, Inc

Filing 117

Order Granting Stipulation re: Time to Answer Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 3/13/2014. (lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/13/2014)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA,
11
SAN JOSE DIVISION
12
LAURA A. PLUMLEE, an individual, on
13 behalf of herself and all other persons
similarly situated,
14
Plaintiff,
15
vs.
16
PFIZER, INC., a New York Corporation,
17
Defendant.
18

CASE NO. 5:13-CV-00414-LHK
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
STIPULATION REGARDING DATE FOR
ANSWER TO AMENDED COMPLAINT
Judge:
Hon. Lucy H. Koh
Location: Courtroom 8, 4th Floor, United
States Courthouse, 280 South First
Street, San Jose, CA 95113

19
20
21
22
23

Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-1(b) and 6-2 Plaintiff Laura A. Plumlee and Defendant

24 Pfizer Inc. (“Pfizer”) filed a Stipulation Regarding Date For Answer To Amended Complaint.
25 Specifically, the parties have agreed that if the Court denies Pfizer’s Motion to Dismiss the
26 Amended Complaint, Pfizer’s Answer to the Amended Complaint will not be due until twenty
27 days after the Court’s order.
28
Case No. 5:13-CV-00414-LHK
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION REGARDING DATE FOR ANSWER TO AMENDED
COMPLAINT

1

Having considered the stipulation, the declaration of Karin Kramer, and for good cause

2 shown, the Court hereby ORDERS as follows:
3

1. If the Court denies Pfizer’s Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint, Pfizer’s

4

Answer to the Amended Complaint will be due twenty (20) days after the Court’s

5

order.

6
7

IT IS SO ORDERED.

8

13
9 DATED: March ___, 2014
10
11
12

Honorable Lucy H. Koh
United States District Judge

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 5:13-CV-00414-LHK
-2[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION REGARDING DATE FOR ANSWER TO AMENDED
COMPLAINT