Marroquin v. Ashron Construction & Restoration, Inc et al
Filing
26
STIPULATION AND ORDER continuing Initial Case Management Conference. Case Management Statement due by 9/10/2013. Initial Case Management Conference continued to 9/17/2013 at 1:30 PM in Courtroom 2, 5th Floor, San Jose. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on July 25, 2013. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/25/2013)
*E-FILED: July 25, 2013*
1
2
3
4
5
6
TOMAS MARGAIN, Bar No. 193555
HUY TRAN, Bar No. 288196
Justice at Work Law Group
84 W. Santa Clara St., Ste. 790
San Jose, CA 95113
Tel: (408) 317-1100
Fax: (408) 351-0105
Tomas@JAWLawGroup.com
Huy@JAWLawGroup.com
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
CESAR GONZALEZ MARROQUIN
and VINCENT DE LA TORRE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
Dawna J. Cilluffo [231219]
Chelsea K. Dunton [288742]
DC Law, Dawna J. Cilluffo, A Professional Corp.
2005 De La Cruz Blvd., Suite 215
Santa Clara, CA 95050
Tel: (408) 988-7946
Fax: (408) 988-7949
dawna@dclawcorp.com
chelsea@dclawcorp.com
Attorneys for Defendants
ASHRON CONSTRUCTION & RESTORATION, INC.,
EZRA COHEN and U.S. SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
14
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
16
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
17
SAN JOSE DIVISION
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
)
) Case Number: CV 13-00421 HRL
)
) STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE
Plaintiffs,
) MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
)
vs.
)
)
ASHRON CONSTRUCTION &
RESTORATION, INC.; EZRA COHEN; and )
U.S. SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, )
)
)
Defendants.
)
CESAR GONZALEZ MARROQUIN and
VINCENT DE LA TORRE,
27
28
1
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE
Plaintiffs CESAR GONZALEZ MARROQUIN and VINCENT DE LA TORRE and
1
2
Defendants ASHRON CONSTRUCTION & RESTORATION, INC. and EZRA COHEN
3
through their attorneys’ of record, hereby stipulate as follows:
4
5
1.
specific instructions to get the case at issue or take defaults. Docket No. 24.
6
7
The Court on July 1, 2013 continued the Initial Case Management Conference with
2.
Prior to this Order, the parties filed a Joint CMC Statement (Docket No. 19), an
8
Answer as to the Amended Complaint was filed by the Corporate Defendant (Docket
9
23) as well as Magistrate Consents as to all three Defendants (Docket Nos. 20 to 22).
10
3.
11
On July 10, 2013, the corporate Defendant, its counsel and Plaintiffs’ counsel
successfully mediated a lawsuit involving a separate wage and hour dispute in the
12
matter of Emeterio v. Ashron NDCA Case No. 5:12-CV-04296 HRL. While that
13
proceeding is not related to this lawsuit, it nonetheless has created momentum for the
14
parties to focus on trying to resolve this case.
15
16
4.
The parties seek a continuance of 45 days to hold various meetings to exchange
17
information and if the matter cannot be resolved submit a stipulation to go to Court
18
Sponsored mediation. During this period, the parties will complete their Rule 26
19
Disclosures which they have already begun.
20
5.
21
22
A continuance is also sought to accommodate Defendants’ counsel’s travel plans to
Boston Massachusetts next week due to a death in the family.
SO STIPULATED
23
FOR PLAINTIFFS
24
25
26
DATED:
July 24, 2013
By:
27
28
2
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE
/s/ Tomas Margain
Tomas E. Margain
For Plaintiffs
FOR DEFENDANTS
1
2
DATED:
July 24, 2013
3
By: /s/ Dawna J. Cilluffo
Dawna J. Cilluffo
For Defendants
4
ORDER
5
Based on GOOD CAUSE shown, the initial Case Management Conference and Rule 26
6
7
Deadlines are continued as follows:
8
9
SEPTEMBER 1, 2013
Last Day to Meet and Confer Regarding Initial Discloses, ADR process election and
10
discovery plan.
11
12
Last Day to file ADR Certificate signed by Parties and Counsel.
13
Last Day to either file a stipulation to ARD Process or Notice of Need for ADR Phone
14
15
Conference
SEPTEMBER 10, 2013 Last Day to File Rule 26(f) Report, complete initial disclosures
16
and file Joint Case Management Statement
17
18
SEPTEMBER 17, 2013 at 1:30 pm
19
20
21
Initial Case Management Conference in Courtroom 2,5th Floor, San Jose Courthouse at
1:30 p.m.
IT IS SO ORDERED
22
23
24
DATED:
July 25, 2013
By:
HOWARD R. LLOYD
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?